The High Cost of Climate Lies

The High Cost of Climate Lies - Alan Caruba - Oct 22, 07: “An energy-rationing bill has been introduced to address ‘global warming.’ The ‘Climate Security Act’ would impose caps on how much carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions can be allowed and would institute an elaborate program to ‘trade’ allowances among the industries and business affected. Americans better hope that some members of Congress will ask if there truly is a threat of global warming and why a similar program in Europe has proven to be a resounding failure. If you really wanted to undermine the nation’s economy, you could not devise a better way. It is the Kyoto Climate Change Protocol on steroids.”

The IPCC has depended on computer climate models for its claims and there is now a volume of papers demonstrating how they have repeatedly been proven to be inaccurate. As Dr. Gray points out, if you cannot validate these models as actually capable of making predictions, “no self-respecting computer engineer would dare to make use of a model for prediction.”

Anyway, “No computer climate model has ever been tested in this way, so none should be used to prediction.”“The most elaborate of all their ‘evaluation’ techniques is far more dubious,” said Dr. Gray. “Since they have failed to show that any models are actually capable of prediction, they have decided to ‘evaluate’ them by asking the opinions of those who originate them, people with a financial interest in their success.” (Emphasis added.)“Sooner or later all of us will come to realize,” Dr. Gray concluded, “that this organization, and the thinking behind it, is phony. Unfortunately severe economic damage is likely to be done by its influence before that happens.”But that’s the point of the IPCC!