Understanding Fascism, today it might be called Liberalism
If you thought fascism was on the Right you might think again. It is on the Far Left. Fascism is national socialism. Therefore many of those liberals on the Left that want government to control so many aspects of our lives are very much the same as Fascists. We could rename the Democrat Party the Fascist Party if the far Left takes control. By the way, everyone running for President among the Democrats is on the far Left even if Hillary calls her self a moderate. Her views are that of a socialist.
|
Date posted: Wednesday, January 9th, 2008 3:06 pm | Under category: Uncategorized
RSS 2.0 | Comment | Trackback











I slighty disagree that Fascism is the same as Nazism. The latter is strongly racist while racism is not necessarily a determining characteristic of Fascism from how I understand it. In Fascism you can sometimes have ‘right-wing’ values being promoted. Keep in mind that Fascism is essentially about class collaboration, that’s why in Italy they didn’t oppose the Catholic Church like Communists would have. In Italy, there were even Jews who were very supportive of the Fascists. In Nazism, traditional values and the central importance of the traditional family and individual responsiblity are opposed. In both Fascism and Nazism, the individual is at the mercy of the State. Same goes for Leninism and other forms of Communism.
But all in all, I fully agree that much of what is called ‘Liberalism’ and other progressives have a lot in commmon with Fascist and Nazi policies, even if it’s just in their methodology.
The economy is a very good example of that. What is ‘center-right’ by European standards is pretty Fascist in reality. I see ‘center-right’ Liberal (bear in mind that ‘Liberal’ often has a more conservative connotation in Europe) parties in gov’t interfering in the economy and making deals with big business just the same way the Social Democrats do. They differ in the extent they allow free competition. The Social Democrats would fix prices and raise taxes to provide more gov’t services, the Liberals would make deals with businesses to press them not to raise prices and be willing to lower taxes. But whether they lower or raise taxes, at the end of the day it is obvious that both camps are leftists. They both are forcing people to get a job as soon as possible, not to encourage people to be industrious and provide for their families, but for the benifit of the common good, the Welfare State. They are the ones who want all women, including married ones with children, to work. They are the ones who would provide subsidized child care to make sure young parents wouldn’t have to care about their kids but would be able to go to work. Which means that there’s no such thing as parental duties and responsiblities left and family is destroyed. And they even give them gov’t benifits for wasting their kids! Homemakers are lousy or old-fashioned in their eyes.
And you know why they do that? If everyone works, they can also tax everyone and at the end of the day it doesn’t make a difference whether one or another party lowered or raised taxes, because they’re still going to have enough money that will sustain big gov’t and most importantly, preserve that Welfare State idol that Europeans worship as a god, the Mammon.
They’re also the ones who talk about quality of life a lot but destroy all that makes life good. First they destroy the family and then they indoctrinate kids and produce a nation that mocks at God and any religion and believes in moral and cultural relativism to the extent they have no basic sense of what’s right and wrong anymore. Consequently, they go on defending perverts and criminals and punish the victims instead of the offenders. They claim capital punishment is barbaric and anti-life but abortion and assisted suicide (euthanasia) somehow are not.
And for the Liberals, all of the above is seen as working for the benifit of society starting with the ‘individual.’ For the Socialists it’s working for the ‘common good.’ And the Centrist ‘Christian Democrats’ are no better, I should add. They are as much for big gov’t as the rest is and I don’t support them.
The social engineering, the hatred for God’s Laws, the lust for power and the idoltatry of man-made ideals and ideologies that exists in Western society is disgusting. They have the same Anticrist spirit and mindset that the Fascists, Nazis and Marxists have.
Europe is Fascist in my view. Its apparent liberalization of the economy is simply a pragmatic solution to allow them to nurture their Fascist beast so it can mature and strangle us.
With the Liberals in the U.S., I suppose it’s not very different. If a Liberal gets elected U.S. president and turns your country in a EU-inspired monster, freedom-loving people and Bible-believing Christians might as well move to the Southpole because the last country that had some fear of God left will be gone.
I am not going to be rebellious towards any gov’t. I will subject myself to it. But I will not subject myself to the extent that I’m virtually forced to disregard my beliefs and the responsiblities I have towards my family if I have one in the future. Either we serve God or we don’t.
Family is the cornerstone of society and the oldest institution of God. Is it coincidence that ‘enlightened,’ humanist and godless people regardless of their political persuasion have always been the first to destroy traditional family in one way or another to manipulate people’s minds through gov’t? I’m looking forward to the day this unrepentant and stubborn people will bear the consequences for their rebellion.
Thanks for the clarification you understand this topic better then me. When countries put different terms on the same words it gets rather confusing.