Obama the change agent

No Gravatar

I usually know in a minute if someone is telling me what they think I want to hear or telling me the truth. Apparently much of America has lost that discernment.

Obama is a man who talks about change and people take that change to be whatever these want to believe it to be. He is their great black hope. However, his change is not the change you might hope to see. Obama’s change is government intervention into every aspect of your life along with the failed economic and social mistakes of Marxism and a foreign policy of appeasement. He is the mouth peace and the puppet of every far Left socialist in America and that is why he has their support. It certainly is not because of his own achievements, he has done nothing worthy of this office. You cannot say you have not been warned.

AD: ‘The Train Wreck Called Obama - The Great Uniter?’ - JB Williams - May 13, 08

His supporters know him only as their “agent of change.” They heard this phrase, “agent of change,” and went into a hypnotic trance. Change is what Obama supporters want, any kind of change, something other than the status quo.

Of course, that’s what the followers of the Pied Piper, Jim Jones, David Koresh and Hitler wanted too. Obama supporters, fearful of modern day rats and in search of anyone promising a solution, no matter how insane, cling to Obama like the children of Hamelin who followed the Pied Piper never to be seen or heard from again.

Under the guise of “change,” silly solutions to real challenges, Obama supporters ignore all reality and cling to an empty, undefined promise without ever asking what kinds of change lay in store, or what makes this neophyte candidate qualified to change anything?

It’s the Sales Pitch, Stupid

Even empty words without meaning have power, among the ill-advised and desperate. Obama has perfected the art of saying what people want to hear, without really saying anything at all.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
Tags: , , , , , , ,
POST SUMMARY
Date posted: Wednesday, May 14th, 2008 7:55 pm | Under category: American patriot topics, Big Brother/Nanny State, Danger to the US, Liberals/Left, socialist
RSS 2.0 | Comment | Trackback

2 Comments

  1. el-Nasrani said »

    To hell with appeasement (disguised pacifism) and political correctness! My take: Get real and stand for the truth. Be ready to stand alone and face opposition. Dare to be passive when you have to and dare to take action if that what it takes as well. Be realistic, be diplomatic and pragmatic in your approach if the ends justify it, but never compromise your principles. Stand by your duties and protect the freedom and security of your own people first instead of neglecting them just to appease those who openly or secretly oppose you.

    I’m not a militarist or some kind of an imperialist that believes it is our duty as Western nations to spread and install Democracy across the globe. Nations should stick their noses out of other nations’ affairs as much as possible. Yet we have to realize that we live in a world in which I believe it to be sheer folly saying we shouldn’t attack until someone attacks us. You need friends and partners even if the relations are merely to serve your own country’s interest and protection. Diplomacy can work but not with certain dictators and nations such as North Korea and Iran. Why refuse to accept this truth?

    In the past nations waged war against nations. But now we have islamic terrorists. And as we all know, terrorist groups are not nations per definition although they can be directly or indirectly backed by some nations. The enemy has become far more invisible than they used to in the past. This is something America’s Founding Fathers probably did not foresee, and we can’t blame them for that. Yet these terrorists do threaten your security and existence. So then are you to abolish all intelligence agencies, sit back and watch them grow stronger and do nothing just because some earlier administrations made foreign policy mistakes that may have eased the rise of these terrorist organizations? Or because they haven’t attacked you “just yet?” And what if these terrorists cause trouble in regions far from home but manage to disrupt stability and the economy at home? Just sit back and enjoy? What’s more is these terrorists are driven by an ideology/religion that is opposed to our political system and Judeo-Christian values and wants to replace it by their own system.

    And then I haven’t even said anything about his moral values insofar as you can call them “values.” Which are obviously be very unbiblical.

    Obama, you are a joke. Unfortunately, you’re not alone.

  2. el-Nasrani said »

    Perhaps the problem with most of them is they think that all people must think rationally just because they *think* they are rational themselves and not driven by “backward ideals” or religion. Well, no, you are not rational. If you were, you would know that some other nations are driven by religious duties such as Jihad, or by irrational ideologies and will not and cannot be appeased. And even if it appears they can be, they are likely to be playing games with you. In the end they will turn their back on you and stab you in the back. So get real. It’s just as silly as those thinking gov’t can help the people in developing nations by donating half of taxpayer’s money to these countries while the money falls into the hands of corrupt leaders. What a waste.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Bad Behavior has blocked 390 access attempts in the last 7 days.