The polar bears hot ice is a snow job for global governance

Here is another view besides my own earlier comments about Interior’s decision to make Polar Bears an endangered species. Marc Sheppard makes it clear that it is going to allow the radicals to get the power that they want to ban everything they want to ban.

Meanwhile ABC showed another one sided propaganda piece on polar bears and seals in today’s news report. I am sure all the major media is following suit with the possible exception of Fox.

Science is not driving the agenda. It appears to be liberal idealism gone amok I do not know if these people actually believe this nonsense or if they just want to believe this nonsense. It is probably some of both. Of course the real power behind the movement is big money and elitist power brokers. In the elitist ideal world all 100,000 enlightened people allowed to live on their perfect planet besides themselves, would pretend that they are like God in their own animal kingdom. If the common people understood that they are just considered useless eaters or workers they would not be supporting their own slavery and demise.

American Thinker Blog: Protecting Not Polar Bears But Warmist Power

Kempthorne knows full well that the greenie groups that demanded the ESA listing are mostly the same that are pressuring the Environmental Protection Agency to declare CO2 a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. And that they have the lawsuits of 17 states and Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works chair Barbara Boxer behind their ridiculous demands.

Should they prevail, the EPA would, indeed, be in control of airborne carbon. And beyond inevitably materializing the green dream of cap-and-trade by regulatory decree, it would - in confluence with yesterday’s dreadful decision — empower unelected bureaucrats to levy huge ESA violation penalties against “polluters.”

And that’s just for starters.

Now consider this — taken but a miniscule regulatory step further, a family motoring about in an SUV in Texas could be cited not only for polluting under the Clean Air Act, but as their “pollution” has been regulated as a global warming contributor, they could be further fined under the Endangered Species Act for harming the protected polar bear.

Did I mention that penalties for such ESA transgressions can be a maximum fine of up to $50,000 or imprisonment for one year, or both — per violation?

Such - not solar or wind — represents the true power sought by warmists.