Science says reject the global warming bunk.

It does not surprise me that a petition of 31,000 scientists would not get a response from Al Gore. He has no response other than name calling and he never debates the scientific issues. That is because he has no scientific proof for his claims. He just continues to make absurd claims, scare kids and brainwash those who forgot how to think for themselves. He is establishing a scheme to put the whole world under global governance through designed shortfalls in food and energy. After all, the elite know that once you control food and energy you rule the world.

Now our own politicians in both parties (with certain exceptions) are jumping aboard his bandwagon. Most have never taken a climate course in their life, but as slime ball layers and power brokers they see benefits to themselves by jumping on this bandwagon and hoping to get a piece of the action.

Everyone needs to inform these political whores that are pushing CO2 caps and are restricting energy development that they had better wise up because we Americans are not going to put up with this junk science driven global power grap and tax extortion ring.

Send them the list that signed this “Petition Project”. If they still do not get the message they need to be removed from office. The consequence to the people on this planet are too great to wait until they pass laws that cost you trillions, oppress the poor, and establish the foundations for global taxation and global governance over everyone.

How can everyone be so blind just because media liars whine about deadly polar bears being threatened? They are not; there are more polar bears than at any time in modern history. They are so threatened that Fish and Wildlife even has a hunting season on them to limit their numbers? There is no man made global warming threat and anything they plan will not have any consequence on climate anyway but it will have a great consequences to prosperity on the earth. Wake up!

31,000 scientists reject ‘global warming’ agenda

The Petition Project actually was launched nearly 10 years ago, when the first few thousand signatures were assembled. Then between 1999 and 2007, the list of signatures grew gradually without any special effort or campaign.

But now, a new effort has been conducted because of an “escalation of the claims of ‘consensus,’ release of the movie ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ by Mr. Al Gore, and related events,” according to officials with the project.

“Mr. Gore’s movie, asserting a ‘consensus’ and ’settled science’ in agreement about human-caused global warming, conveyed the claims about human-caused global warming to ordinary movie goers and to public school children, to whom the film was widely distributed. Unfortunately, Mr. Gore’s movie contains many very serious incorrect claims which no informed, honest scientist could endorse,” said project spokesman and founder Art Robinson.

WND submitted a request to Al Gore’s office for comment, but did not get a response.

Robinson said the dire warnings about “global warming” have gone far beyond semantics or scientific discussion now to the point they are actually endangering people.

“The campaign to severely ration hydrocarbon energy technology has now been markedly expanded,” he said. “In the course of this campaign, many scientifically invalid claims about impending climate emergencies are being made. Simultaneously, proposed political actions to severely reduce hydrocarbon use now threaten the prosperity of Americans and the very existence of hundreds of millions of people in poorer countries,” he said.

“The necessary hydrocarbon and nuclear energy production technologies have been available to U.S. engineers for many decades. We can develop these resources without harm to people or the environment. There is absolutely no technical, resource, or environmental reason for the U.S. to be a net importer of energy. The U.S. should, in fact, be a net exporter of energy,” he said.

He told WND the issue has nothing to do with energy itself, but everything to do with power, control and money, which the United Nations is seeking. He accused the U.N. of violating human rights in its campaign to ban much energy research, exploration and development.

“In order to alleviate the current energy emergency and prevent future emergencies, we need to remove the governmental restrictions that have caused this problem. Fundamental human rights require that U.S. citizens and their industries be free to produce and use the low cost, abundant energy that they need. As the 31,000 signatories of this petition emphasize, environmental science supports this freedom,” he said.