Where is that global warming consensus?

More of the scientific community is seeing that man caused global warming is overstated. The IPCC was concealing its method of reaching its conclusions because the man caused global warming conclusions were make by bureaucrats who wish to use this issue to further the UN’s global governance agenda. The conclusions in the report were not make by atmospheric scientists. We also know much of the data they used in the report has been found to be wrong. Apart from the people on the hundred billion dollar global warming payroll I would like someone to find that global warming consensus of scientists.

Al Gore lies through his teeth and keeps bringing up the scientific consensus  and follows it by saying that the few deniers of man caused global warming (ten’s of thousands of true scientists) are equal to holocaust deniers and members of he Flat Earth Society. So Al Gore where is this huge consensus of atmosphereic scientists and why won’t you even debate true climate scientists on this issue instead of just saying the debate is over?

Are you really saying that UN’s hand selected panels are always right on everything? Now that opinion would might help get you a Nobel Peace Prize but they also give those to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers.

Top physics group shows crack in warming ‘consensus’

In another strike against the conventional assertion of a consensus on global warming, a publication of an organization representing more than 50,000 physicists acknowledges many members of the scientific community don’t believe humans are the primary cause of climate change.

The editor of Physics & Society, a newsletter of the American Physical Society, says that with his July issue he wants to kick off a debate concerning one of the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC.

Monckton, who believes natural variability is the cause of most recent warming, told the DailyTech he was “dismayed” to discover the IPCC’s 2001 and 2007 reports did not properly explain the method used to reach its conclusions.

“When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method,” he said.

Larry Gould, professor of physics at the University of Hartford and chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton’s paper an “expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and “extensive errors,” the DailyTech said.