You know about as much about anyone’s entry into heaven and what is really homosexual bashing as you do about the Bible so considering the source you are totally irrelevant.

Don’t worry about it, Donny. There’s only so much filth I can stomach, and your bilious blog has met that quota.

Enjoy your gay-bashing. It’ll ensure your entry into your heaven. Just be prepared: it might be a lot hotter than you had anticipated.

I do not think most true Christians would approve of your foul-mouthed narrow-minded statements against me on this post and the other post that you commented on. By the way, I never said my statement was a “Christian” expression. As I implied before, the expression on this blog documents why the world is becoming a demented, delusional and dumb place.

You only have the right to express your opinion in the comments section of my Blog if I allow you to. That may soon end.

There is nothing that I said that is hate speech against homosexuals. I love homosexuals enough to try to correct them and to try to stop them from spreading disease and killing themselves and others and to give them the message of salvation and deliverance from their bondage. I do not do that on every single post and did not do it here because this post was not about homosexuals in general anyway.

This post was about certain pansy’s who claim their feeling were hurt by the Christian position on homosexuality so they use that as a license to get Christians dragged before Canadian tribunals just because they can get away with that in Canada and it was about that we should not allow that to happen here.

There are many ways to combat the homosexual agenda and none of them are exclusively right or wrong in every case. In the homosexual culture you have predators and you have victims but most of activist leaders are predators and they need to be dealt with as such. I was not addressing homosexuals in general in this post anyway, I was addressing the issues in the article that I quoted. Your the one who made what I said out to be an attack on homosexuals. When you start looking for hate speech and become the judge and jury of my free Christian expression you become very much like Mr. West.

I don’t consider the Bible to be “hate speech” but my point was I didn’t know exactly what was said. I didn’t notice the links. But I did recognize speech that ISN’T in the Bible that gets a lot closer to the line of being hate speech: YOUR words, not the Bible’s

I don’t “support” the homosexual culture. But there is a was to express your disapproval of the homosexual culture without being smarmy and derogatory. You evidently haven’t evolved that far yet. Good luck with that.

In any case, Catholic Insight was cleared of the charges. Those that made the judgment know exactly what Catholic Insight said and they cleared them on the grounds that the reporting was not likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt based on sexual orientation. What else would you need to know? Are you going to out judge the judges by having the exact words? You also could do a little research on your own if you want the exact words. Further, the article explains that Catholic Insight was just quoting Catholic doctrine on Homosexuality THAT DOCTRINE IS WELL KNOWN. I agree with the Catholic position on homosexuality. What in the world else would I or you need to know? Do you want me to read the Catholic Catechism to you. Do you want me to read what the Bible says about homosexuality to you? You claim to be a Christian you ought to know these things but obviously you never even read the doctrines that support the religion you claim to believe in.

Mr. West is appealing the case to the Federal court. Federal courts cost a lot of money and that is the real way they intimidate people to not oppose their agenda. The article also explains that this is not the first time Mr. West has attacked Christian publications.

So what you find so offense that I said really must come down to this lone statement.
“It is well known how homosexual queens wear their feelings on their blouse sleeve and it costs people a lot of money to defend themselves from these pansy attacks”

I do not think any ration person would question that feminine homosexual men are overly sensitive and often act and dress like woman. So what I said there really does apply. Therefore, the offense really just comes down to the words “pansy attacks”. They are attacking Christians and they are homosexuals so I guess I could have said homosexual attacks instead of pansy attacks and you would have not even have responded, right? Sure!

Homosexuals can do injustice to the English language by calling themselves gays when they are not gay, they are homosexuals, but I cannot call them pansy’’s? That was a common English word for feminine men before homosexuals came out of the closet and twisted the English meaning on that word claiming that it is offensive to them. Must we change the whole English language to appease homosexuals? There are many other common English words that they also find offense because someone might have called them that? Well join the world, we all have been called offense names we do not like but we do not need to change the language because of it. You called me a pea brain. Don’t you know that retarded people would find that term offensive? They also would find the word retarded offensive. Like this Blog indicates, the world is becoming a demented, delusion and dumb place when you cannot even express yourself without being called a bigot by people like you who offend me by redefining the language.

People like you are so tolerant that they are intolerant toward those who still tell the truth. You can call me names but you want to be the protector of the English language. Give me a break!

If you read my post I was concerned about Canadian laws coming here when people like you vote for people who will support having the same hate speech tribunals in the United States. Like you said, you do not care if Christians get hauled before some government body for quoting the Bible. You support a culture that brings disease and early death but you see no problem with supporting that but you still claim to be such a religious Christian man..

Before ANYBODY can intelligently comment on the topic, you need to know what exactly was said in the Catholic Insight. Your post gave no clue as to what was said.

In their absence, I chose to look at YOUR words, which are in fact offensive. And, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not, there’s little doubt you intended them to be offensive; it evidently makes you feel better about yourself when belittling others.

If the Catholic Insight uses derogatory language like yours, thinking it’s acceptable, then they’re at fault, too. I don’t care if they get hauled before some Canadian governmental body or not; I think we should be able to trust Canadians to govern Canada in their own best interest.

In the other blog post that you respond on you were given the gospel of salvation to you a couple of times by two different people. Yet, you give no indication that you believe it or even understand it. Still you call yourself a very religious Christian. Based on what I might ask again?

My comments do not have to be read if you do not like them and I don’t expect homosexuals or demented liberals to agree with them. Like I said this blog documents a demented delusional and dumb world not what people like you wish to think it is. Just by the title you should be able to figure out that some satire and other literary devices would be used to attract attention to the post and to get the the points across.

Your responses or should I say lack of responses to the topic gives me reason to believe that you are just a troll looking to attack any Christians that is trying to stop the homosexual agenda in this nation. If you continue to not address the subject of the blog posts and just attacking on my blogs you will be banned from making any comments at all.