The representatives that Americans elect to office prove they know nothing about American Civics. They are dumb.

No Gravatar

Here are two articles that document just how dumb Americans have become. Americans cannot even pass a basic civics test and the people they elect are worse educated than they are. Perhaps you should have to get a minimum grade on a civics test to prove that you have some knowledge of how our system operates before a person should be allow to vote. The second article just reaffirms the dumbing down of America that explains why Americans elect fools to lead them. What does that say about our failed public education system? All Americans who cannot get a passing grade on a basic civics test and all responsible for our educational system deserve my Demented, Delusional or Dumb Club award.

American Public Flunks Basic Civics - HUMAN EVENTS

*Fully 71 percent of Americans flunked a 33-question civic-literacy survey conducted by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Among 2,508 respondents ISI randomly selected, 1,791 failed this test of U.S. historical, political, and economic basics. The average score was just 49 out of 100 — a solid F. While just 2.6 percent scored Bs on this quiz,

*Just 49 percent of rank-and-file Americans can identify the legislature, executive, and judiciary as our three branches of government.

*Forty percent of college graduates have no idea that corporate profits equal revenues minus expenses. (Thus, congressional demagoguery about “windfall profits” falls on sympathetic ears.) Only 24 percent of college grads realize that the First Amendment forbids the establishment of an official U.S. religion.

*Amazingly enough, this sample’s 164 self-identified elected officials know even less than laymen. They averaged only 44, as the blind lead the bland. Among office holders, 30 percent did not know that the Declaration of Independence heralds “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

“Our study raises significant questions about whether citizens who voted in this year’s landmark presidential election really understand how our system of representative democracy works,” said Dr. Richard Brake, ISI’s Director of University Stewardship.

Lt. General Josiah Bunting III, the chairman of ISI’s National Civic Literacy Board, describes his initial reaction to these results as “somewhat short of despair, certainly one of depression.” He adds: “These questions are designed to elicit answers to fundamental questions. A citizen should know that the president cannot declare war. A citizen should know the circumstances of the founding of the country.”

The grim results of ISI’s study reveal a crisis in this nation’s defining concept. In 1776, America’s Founding Fathers broke with Britain and established a country where men and women liberated from monarchic despotism would rule themselves, provided they were equipped with the requisite knowledge and wisdom. Will a people mesmerized by the televised humiliation of wannabe pop stars maintain this essential capacity for self-government? Thomas Jefferson’s warning remains as timely as ever: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free…it expects what never was and never will be.”

Full article

Obama-King of Fools - HUMAN EVENTS

Trying to explain how our economy works and why lowering taxes is always better for them and their country, than imposing higher taxes is an economic bridge too far for many of the Obama sheep. Unfortunately there is no “See Spot & the Economy Run” book for the hooked on phonics crowd. Many of these numbskulls can’t balance a check book or spell “e-c-o-n-o-m-i-c-s” but they sure know who will give them stuff. The lie is impossible.

Expecting these idiotscitizens to have analyzed the tax positions of Obama and McCain and arrive at a decision that truly benefits them and America is wishful thinking. The reason is that they know zilch about how the economy operates and worse, don’t care. Bama will take care of us. Four very scary things-a sow grizzly with cubs at closerange, a coiled rattlesnake in striking distance, me in a rental car in the left lane, and dunces with credit cards.

And indeed they are dunces, products of a tax burning, failed public education system. That is, if they even bothered to complete high school. They don’t read newspapers or books, and even if they did, I got twenty bucks that says they couldn’t comprehend what they read. They are morons in the first degree. And clearly, they vote.

If and when President Obama attempts to impose his wrong-headed, punitive tax structure, their stupidity is going to come back to thump them upside their vacuous heads with a very painful crowbar of reality. The economy works in strange and wondrous ways and has a unique way of severely punishing fools. Rare justice is a beautiful thing.

These dunderheads have no clue how the economic mess was largely caused by Democrats, including Obama. But Obama, recognizing how gullible, naive and dumb many of his supporters are, drummed it into them that the economic mess was caused by President Bush and the Republicans and that he is going to give 95% of Americans a tax cut when 40% of Americans don’t even pay any federal taxes. Investing deception capital in the stupidity of his supporters was a very wise move on Obama’s part. That is if you don’t really care about anything except getting elected.

Full article

» 1 Comment

The science on global warming is settled. There is no human induced global warming.

No Gravatar

Obama’s stated agenda will bring carbon cap and trade taxes on us and hinder the use of fuels that produce CO2. Those like him who believe rising CO2 is causing global warming are either very ignorant of the latest facts or they are purposely being deceptive in order to expand global governance over everyone. This article points out many of the latest facts on global warming and climate change. Those who say the science is settled and that man is causing global warming either do not know what they are talking about or they are lying. The real scientific evidence says there is no human induced global warming from CO2 and the earth has actually cooled for the past decade. People really need to get off of Al Gore’s Chicken Little soapbox.

The following quote is just the end of this article that gives the Petition Statement signed by over 31,000 scientists and the author of this article comments about the UN’s IPCC report. You will have to read the whole article to get the real facts on why man is not causing global warming. If that article below still does not have your brain deprogrammed read this article about the new book that came out on this topic. It is called Red Hot Lies About Global Warming.

American Thinker: Global Warming? Bring it On!

Here’s the Petition Statement we dissenters signed in opposition:

“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

Let me assure you that we’re not in good humor, nor take it kindly to be slurred and ridiculed by taking the other side in this debate. And our numbers are still growing. Indeed, we’re angry that the vast majority of American Scientists will not be heard by the media. We’re dismayed over the fact that the Global Warming fiasco has become politically popular and expedient to those left-wing politicians and power-brokers whose sole aim is to literally tax everything with a carbon footprint and give them control over all life, hidden within their PC guileful pretence to save the planet. They wish to save no one but themselves.

And the tide turns further. Of the 2500 originally aligned scientists and putative authors of the UN’s IPCC report some 500 are no longer faithful to Big Al’s errand. Many of these scientists discovered that their individual findings and comments were willfully misrepresented. All participant conclusions were unilaterally changed to adhere strictly to the United Nations objective of building support for world taxation and rationing of industrially useful energy. Since the original IPCC report (and there have been some 4 others now formally issued), the defecting 500 scientists have issued public statements challenging global warming. Approximately 100 of these scientists are now open defectors. Others are currently suing the UN for the misuse of their good names and research. It is difficult to see why a thinking person would even consider the IPCC report as legitimate.

The entire IPCC process is but obfuscation by the secular and atheist Left. It has allowed the Left to conflate the vanity of secular opinion with scientific and/or moral truth. There is an easy and immediate remedy for their debacle. Will Rogers stated it simply: “When you are in a hole … stop digging…. Please!”

Full article

» No Comments

The Great Recession, the Great Depression or the Great Inflationary Depression of the 2010’s

No Gravatar

I think most of our politicians and most Americans are living under some false delusion that the “yes we can” Candy Man is going to fix the economy. Before you eat too much of his sugar you might read about why that cannot happen.

This first article will have nice graphs and explanations why this is not an ordinary recession. It is my own view that it will lead into a conventional great depression unless we take the path of a  long term inflationary depression.

Think not? Read this article that gives 30 reason why there will be a great depression by early next decade. Having said that, If our government can do anything to prevent a depression they will. They are not likely to allow the nation to go into a deflationary spiral. They will just dump money fresh off the printing presses out of helicopters first.

Of course doing that pisses off people in other nations that hold trillions of our dollars that they actually had to trade for their own goods and services. With more dollars being printed you will have more dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services in the world which means that the prices of everything bought in dollars will be bid up, making the buying power of all the dollars that they hold buy less. So they will either get angry and dump the dollars at a loss or demand much higher interest rates to take the risk of holding them while they lose value. I believe this is economics 101 although it seems to me that those that are running our government probably took the pass/fail version of the course and only showed up for the multiple guess tests.

Anyway, higher prices on goods and services always means higher inflation and that means a higher cost of living for everyone. Also higher interest rates on servicing the national debt means government will have less money and they will have to borrow even more money or print more money causing an inflationary spiral. The article on this link will explain why government most likely will choose the path of inflation rather than let the country go into a classic depression.

I suppose you know that historically government has always shut down inflation by raising interest rates higher and higher until less people can afford to borrow. That does work, but it is very bad for business and for those who want to buy houses, cars and other items they usually finance. Since it would cost more to borrow, businesses would tend to not expand and some would go out of business and unemployment would rise. Only when there are less dollars to buy those goods and services will prices and interest rates actually start to come down. That is the way they have been managing our economy since world war II.

The crises now is that the interest rate controls that they used to keep our economy deflating or inflating over the past 60 years will not work this time because we are now at the start of a deep recession and interest rates are already as low as they can go. They cannot lower rates below zero or they would be giving money away. Government is now borrowing money and spending it like a drunken sailor and still the economy continues to tank. The only thing left for government to do to avoid a deflationary spiral is to give away money. That will put the government further in debt. The Candy Man has said he has no problem giving out trillions of dollars in the next two years to get the economy going again. Problem is, The Candy Man will come in office with the national debt at about $12 trillion. The sugar he will hand out from the national debt candy machine will put the nation $15 trillion in debt within two years. So, by 2011 the national debt will have increased 50 percent.

But as I already said, keeping the printing presses running will make the dollar worth less to those that hold them. Not only that, they will want higher returns to take the risk to hold them because the interest on our $15 trillion debt will be so large that they will fear, with good reason, that we will default on the payments. They certainly will demand more control over how we spend money in this nation and we will lose much sovereignty. The present economic crises is already lossing our soverignty as this link describes. It is amazing how one elitist controlled Texan can all by himself give away our nation to the European globalists.

But, getting back to the depression scenario, higher interest rates by the Federal reserve always brings national slow downs but since we will be coming out of the worst recession since the Great depression in two years and real unemployment will be running greater than 15 percent the government could not allow us to go back into recession. If they did it will turn into a 1930’s type great depression and civil breakdown. So they will keep printing more money creating an inflationary spiral better known as hyperinflation or an inflationary depression.

We saw that take place in Germany prior to world war II. It brought about the rise of Hitler. We saw it in Argentina more recently, and it is now taking place in Zimbabwe. That is most likely our future, but there is a small chance that government will instead cut spending and raise taxes significantly to pay our debt and then we will just be in great depression II but that will probably be worse than great depression I. If that should happen besides the civil unrest we will have to default on our debts, pull all our troops home from everywhere, and become a isolated nation or at least a nation that lost its sovereignty.

In any case, because of massive national debt and entitlement debt there is no way out of this one and whether we go into a great depression or hyperinflation the results for most Americans will be very similar. Living standards in the U.S. will be reduced to that of Mexico. Perhaps even worse, if we get in foreign conflicts or have great civil unrest and martial law. If that happens you will see a national draft, and rationing of everything.

This is not a pretty picture of the near future for the USA, but to be informed and to prepare for it is better than living in delusion. The “yes we can” Candy Man slogans will not be able to deliver us from what we cannot fix without great individual and personal sacrifice. it would be better to save the possive thinking “yes we can” slogans for those that will take part in the next revolution.

» 9 Comments

Obama gore’s state governors with crap and trade climate horror film rhetoric

No Gravatar

Obama obviously does not have a clue about what he is talking about on climate change. That is the danger of electing someone who has never learned to critically think for himself or just as likely is a controlled puppet of the global elite. To me it seems like Obama is just repeating what he seen at Al Gore’s horror movie. (Produced and directed by the world’s foremost crap and trade flimflam man.)

I will now rebut what I quoted of Obama’s speech below at the Governors Climate Summit.

  • Climate change should be the least of the concerns of America and the world. There is almost nothing we can do about climate change and doing anything could be worse then leaving it to God.
  • Global warming science is not beyond dispute. Man caused global warming is beyond belief and so say 31,000 scientists.
  • Sea levels have been rising long before the industrial age and have nothing to do with man. We have been coming out of a little ice age for centuries and that is good because otherwise we could not support our world population and would have world famines and starvation.
  • Coastlines are hardly shrinking they are quite stable water seeks its own level.
  • We have always seen record droughts somewhere in this world and the droughts we have today are no worse than droughts in historical times.
  • We do not have spreading famine in the world. There were much worse famines prior to the green revolution and throughout history. Most if not all famine today is the result of polices by governments and wars.
  • Storms are not growing stronger with each passing hurricane season like Obama said. Ocean temperatures are not warming they have been steady or cooling for a decade. Scientific studies have also proven that warming temperatures would not produce more severe storms it would produces more global cloud cover and rain and less severe storms. The last couple of hurricane seasons were below average and the few we have had in recent years that were above average are as normal as the seasons below average. The more recent hurricane damage have nothing to do with global warming and everything to do with more people living and building on the coasts.
  • Since there is nothing we can do about climate change there is nothing we can do about its effects on our economy except make it worse by spending money on a non existent problem.
  • Since there is nothing we can do about climate change there is nothing we can do about its effects on our national security.
  • Obama says he intends to start a cap and trade system. Doing so will raise the price of everything for no reason. That will have a very negative effect on our economy and national security.
  • $15 billion a year spent on alternative energy will do little to change our dependence on foreign oil and if the economy grows at historical levels dependence on foreign oil will actually increase. You cannot decrease CO2 emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 unless you are planning on a national depression. Legislating an 80 percent reduction by 2050 will bring national suicide.
  • Our planet really needs saving from people who play God and think they can save it by throwing money at climate change problems that do not exist and that they could do almost nothing about it if it did exist.
  • You cannot spend money to create 5 million new jobs without someone paying for the job creation. Since that will be the people of this nation through higher taxes and higher cost of most products the lost income will lower our buying power and millions of other people will lose their jobs. There is no free lunch. Democrats think that government can create jobs out of thin air without economic consequences to others but that is nuts. Now, it is true, that if we create our own energy instead of importing it we can create jobs here but the most cost effective way to do that and to increase the most jobs is to increase coal production, coastal oil production and to advance mini nuclear power plant production (like those on subs).

So even on Federal climate change you should see how Obama will waste our money and make the economic situation in this nation worse. So with this faulty illogical thinking at the top we are in a world of crap. Luckily you will have plenty of green toilet paper after Obama and the policies of the Democrats finish off the dollar and this nation. Everything I said on climate change is documented by real scientists (not flim flam men) and can be found within the category “global warming” on the sidebar.

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Obama’s Remarks to the Bi-Partisan Governors Climate Summit

Let me begin by thanking the bipartisan group of U.S. governors who convened this meeting.

Few challenges facing America - and the world - are more urgent than combating climate change. The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear. Sea levels are rising. Coastlines are shrinking. We’ve seen record drought, spreading famine, and storms that are growing stronger with each passing hurricane season.

Climate change and our dependence on foreign oil, if left unaddressed, will continue to weaken our economy and threaten our national security.

That will start with a federal cap and trade system. We will establish strong annual targets that set us on a course to reduce emissions to their 1990 levels by 2020 and reduce them an additional 80% by 2050.

Further, we will invest $15 billion each year to catalyze private sector efforts to build a clean energy future. We will invest in solar power, wind power, and next generation biofuels. We will tap nuclear power, while making sure it’s safe. And we will develop clean coal technologies.

This investment will not only help us reduce our dependence on foreign oil, making the United States more secure. And it will not only help us bring about a clean energy future, saving our planet. It will also help us transform our industries and steer our country out of this economic crisis by generating five million new green jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced.

Full Article

» 11 Comments

No Good for the Obama years, Just Bad, Ugly and Super Ugly

No Gravatar

Obama will do the will of the Democrats and the Rino’s in Congress and anyone who could not have figured that out probably should not have been mentally qualified to vote. He will never take a stand against or veto any agenda that they pass but he will help shape it. The Democratic administration will be as bad and as ugly as Biden, Reed, Polosi, Clinton, Shulmer, Kennedy, Frank, Gore, Jackson and all the other far left socialist insane.

You do not really think that the far left running the Democrats are going to let this opportunity pass and thus risk the loss of this opportunity to change American to their own radical socialistic vision through the elections two years from now? They will pass most of the “bad” in this article before this fall and that is why they want to get off the ground running in January. Then the following year they will use media and their pulpit to brainwash, spin truth, collect funds, and repress free speech in order to keep their Congressional super-majorities for the next two years.

After that it will get truly “ugly” when they take control of the Supreme Court, make illegal immigrants citizens so they can vote, and stack the deck and change laws in favor of Democrats to effectively rig the next Presidential election. After Obama gets reelected to a second term it will get super ugly because half the nation will totally have had it with our Federal government system and they will literally take matters in their own hands.

American Thinker: 3 Scenarios for the Obama Years: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

The real Barack Obama is still unknown, supposedly. One take is that he is a smart guy who will move toward the center and govern moderately and competently. Another take is that he is the most radical person to ever hold the position of President who will take the US on a hard left course into a socialist state lacking any resemblance to the country our founders gave us.

I also have a third scenario, and it is my scariest one: he will do the latter, but make it appear like the former. That is, he will be take the US on a hard left course, but in such a way so as to not scare the Christopher Buckleys and soccer moms of the world too much, too soon.

» 1 Comment

Mad jackasses liberally supported by gullible sheeple move their fresh herd toward the White House

No Gravatar

Are liberals certifiably mad? Some very astute bright professional and medical people would say so. The liberal leaders do show every indication of being clinically nuts. The rest are mostly sheeple that have chosen to follow the liberal Jackasses to the Capitol Hill slaughter houses. How many times have we already seen liberal socialism madness played out in the world? Now thanks to quite insane people taking over the Jackass Party with liberal support from gullible sheeple we see a fresh herd of Jackasses moving toward the White House. Now we will get to see a liberal amount of national insanity played out right here before your eyes in the good old USA. Here is an example of what we may get.

Here is another example but don’t think you will be allowed to sit around and pick your nose like they did nor so many years in Europe, not with our national debt. It also is not just Jackasses that are jackasses the GOP has a herd full of them called Rinos. George Will explains the free enterprise system they helped trample in welcome to socialism.

Is liberalism political madness?

There is a profound ignorance and loathing in the political philosophy of liberalism against human nature. Where it is discussed in polite company it is done so in context of casting maledictions, ridicule and contempt upon Christians, Christianity and their belief in the synthesis of legality and morality; an idea adopted by the framers of the Constitution and held as absolutely indispensable to the survival of America’s republic.

To your average liberal intellectual or humanist academic, the Founding Fathers and the Constitution’s framers were the lowest, vilest, murderous hypocrites on the face of the earth and only deserve our utter condemnation. We see this displayed daily on the liberal media, in the judicial system, in the Democratic Party, in its leadership, its committees and the policies they champion, both domestic and foreign. Virtually every word uttered, printed or recorded by liberals is a dishonorable, unbroken litany of treason against America’s laws, economics, culture, society and her most sacred values.

Rossiter said that liberalism is “based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions; modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded.”

Using legal logic and deductive reasoning, if, as Dr. Rossiter brilliantly delineates, liberalism is a psychological disorder tantamount to political madness and America just elected Barack Obama, who according to the National Journal is the most liberal member of both houses of Congress, who ran on a socialist platform of resurrection of the welfare state of FDR, then what does that say about our American citizens who have elected these people to have Stalin-like control over every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave?

Can you say UAA, United Asylum of America?

Full article

» No Comments

Government morons singing the Hank Paulson blues.

No Gravatar

President Bush, Obama and McCain and most of the Congress and the Senate all sang the Hank Paulson blues to America. The 700 Billion figure was just a figure pulled out of thin air because they did not think they could sell over a trillion dollars to the American people. At first they did not have the votes but then they added $150 billion in pork to buy the votes they needed. Now Paulson is taking the money and doing the exact oppose that he said he was going to do with it. Much of the money was given to a few bank who did not need it but had no choice but to take it. On the one hand they are telling these banks that they forced to take money to tighten up there lending requirements and on the other hand they are saying they need to lend out more money. The 46 Billion loan to AIG is now up to $150 Billion. The Fanny May Freddie Mac bailout is going to cost much more than they ever let on.

There will be hundreds of hands out for the remaining piece of the money pie. Taxpayers will be given the choice to make more money pies or lose their jobs. The bill to the taxpayers in any case will probably exceed two trillions dollars and that will not include the cost of falling government revenues in a recession. Then the government thinks they can finance trillions of dollars in additional debt to world suckers at less than the world inflation rate? More likely the government will be forced to just print additional dollars to pay the debt which will make the dollar crash like a rock bringing the U.S. a much greater financial disaster.

This is what happens when Americans let government morons try to manage things like they actually know what they are doing. If these people had any brains to start with they would not be working for the government. Now Americans will put a President in place who wants the government to manage just about everything ranging from health care, to energy, to climate. It seems to me the American people deserve the Demented Delusional or Dumb Club Award for knowing nothing, being the most gullible people on earth and trusting their own future to these morons running the Federal government.

Hank Paulson, naked emperor (OneNewsNow.com)

The White House says: “We’ll just trust our treasury secretary to implement the program.” President Bush insists “government’s role will be limited and temporary.” Meanwhile, Democratic Rep. Barney Frank is shrugging off the lack of bailout disclosure by both the Federal Reserve and Treasury. But as I reminded readers before this latest bait-and-switch admission, Hank Paulson is not to be trusted. I repeat:

This is the man who proclaimed the subprime crisis “largely contained” in April 2007; “near the bottom” in May 2007; and “largely contained” again in August 2007. This is the man who pledged that he had “no interest in bailing out lenders or property speculators” in October 2007 and couldn’t “think of any situation where the backdrop of the global economy was as healthy as it is today.”

This is the man who patted himself on the back for refusing to “put taxpayer money on the line” to rescue Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15 — and then turned around the next day and engineered the $85 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of AIG. This is the man who vowed he had “no plans to insert money” into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and then turned around and committed $200 billion in capital and credit lines to those corrupt, bloated, crumbling institutions.

This is the man who declared that “the worst is likely to be behind us” in May 2008.

Full Article

» 1 Comment

The first act signed by Obama will be unconstitutional

No Gravatar

I do not see how the Federal government can overturn current laws adopted by all the states. So the first act Obama would sign would be unconstitutional. How fitting. Somehow I do not think that if Obama takes the path of tyranny that He will be leading this country very long. America is in for a very rude awaking in a few months. The first act signed by Obama will be unconstitutional and open the door to kill an additional hundred thousand babies. It seems that this will be only the first of many such activities.That makes me wonder if Liberals live in reality they simply do not understand America. They actually thought America was voting in fascism. They will find out differently.

So why was it that most of you Catholics voted for Obama? You say it is because you do not even believe the teachings of your Church? That says wonders about the state of Catholicism among Americans.

Freedom of Choice Act looms, Catholics afraid (OneNewsNow.com)

That statistic was a bit surprising to American Life League (ALL), considering the effort by many of the church’s bishops to sway the flock away from supporting the strong pro-abortion candidate. LifeNews.com says the Freedom of Choice Act, or FOCA, would legalize unlimited abortions nationally and would overturn the current laws adopted by all 50 states designed to reduce abortions. President-elect Obama has stated he would sign the FOCA bill as his first presidential act.

Full article

» No Comments

Sovereign states taking victory from the coming federal tyranny

No Gravatar

An Obama Victory in 2012 is very likely for the reasons stated in this article. The solution to constitutional abuses by the federal government is also the one stated. States and local governments simply do not have to go along with unconstitutional federal decrees because each State in this Union has sovereignty to decide its own fate. Sure, that means that the federal government will attempt to blackmail and intimidate local governments by cutting off federal funding but States can also withhold taxes to the federal government and secede from the Union if necessary. When that happens federal government will obviously use federal forces and expose themselves to all American patriots as the out of control central government that they will have become. When Heartland America wakes up some States will get victory from federal tyranny.

American Thinker: How Barack Obama Will Ensure His Victory in 2012

The coup de grace Obama will use against rightist opposition is mostly embodied in one word: Amnesty. This, along with some other measures, will both grow the Hispanic voting block and ingratiate Obama to it. This will enable him to create a powerful coalition of blacks, young voters and Hispanics that, along with the older whites he will be able to retain, will constitute an insurmountable electoral force. And this is why amnesty has long been a dream of the Democrats. Even easier than brainwashing new voters (which the media and academia specialize in) is importing them.

But having a water-carrying mainstream media isn’t enough — the left will also try to stifle voices that would report the truth. To this end, they will attempt to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. And although it may be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of two years hence, this may not be the case once Obama has the opportunity to appoint two or three justices. Also lying further down the road may be hate-speech laws, which target “hate” about as much as legislation that would destroy talk radio ensures fairness. They already exist in most of the western world and, incredibly, some judges actually view this as precedent. Ruth Bader-Ginsberg, that affirmative-action appointee, said herself that the Internet makes other nations’ court rulings readily available and that we should learn from them. Said she, “[As judges and lawyers] we must look beyond our borders, to the laws and constitutions of other nations.” By the way, some people call this a judicial philosophy. I call it malfeasance and treason.

So this is our probable dystopian reality. Yet we do have some recourse. And here is what I recommend for now.

The Founding Fathers meant for us to be a nation of states, not a nation state; they intended for most power to rest on the state level and for localities to largely shape their own destinies. We must embrace this model with boldness and vigor. Huge swaths of our nation are now in the pocket of the left, but there are yet bastions of light wherein traditionalists can hold sway. In these places, campaign hard and seize control of the local governments. Then, resist any and every unconstitutional mandate.

Full article

» 12 Comments

What If Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements to be President?

No Gravatar

Janet Porter lays out the case that Barak Obama may not be constitutionally qualified to be President of the U.S. If that is found to be true will Americans uphold the Constitution or fearing the consequences demand that the courts redefine the law? Either way, it would so divide the nation that we could soon have martial law. It would have made much more sense for Obama to just provide the proof to the court. Now for the sake of the nation everyone had better hope that Obama actually has some.

Besides the below article I just ran across an article today where a Imam just took Obama’s birth records to the U.K. from the Mosque’s archives. This Imam is allegedly the grandson of the late Imam who blessed Barack Obama when he was born in Mombasa on the 4th of august 1961. If those records actually exist Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President.

The Constitution still matters

Hold on. Just a minute. Not only was there no landslide and no mandate, there was no election. The Electoral College doesn’t even vote until Dec. 15. And there’s one thing that may stand in their way from affirming last Tuesday’s popular vote: the Constitution.

For the electors to uphold the Constitution that they’re sworn to do with their upcoming vote, they must first know for sure that the candidates meet the basic constitutional requirements for the office of president. He must be a natural-born citizen, at least 35 years old, and have at least 14 years of residency in these United States. That’s not a lot to ask. Pretty basic, really.

And pretty easy. Either you are a natural born citizen or you aren’t. Just deliver the original birth certificate and everyone can be on their way. That’s just what Phillip J. Berg has asked the United States Supreme Court to do. And the Supreme Court has asked for a response from Barack Obama along with the Democratic National Committee and Federal Elections Commission. And they have until Dec. 1 to respond.

Full article

» 1 Comment

Lack of assimilation produces enclaves for terrorism in Britain and in Europe.

No Gravatar

This report on the terrorist threat in Britain is grave. They admit that are some 200 terrorist networks functioning in Britain that are aligned with al-Qaeda today and that there are now at least 30 active plots in the works. They also say that more domestic terrorists are being recruited on campuses and in prisons.

This of course is not limited to Britain. It is going on all over the West to some extent. Anyone who thinks these people can be appeased by pretending that they are not a threat needs serious help. Also, how can 200 terrorist networks exist in Britain if many more so called “moderate” Muslims are not aiding and abetting them, or at the very least turning a blind eye to their activities? Let’s face it, there is a civil war brewing between the Muslim immigrants and the natives of European countries and the sooner Europeans realize it the better off Europe will be.

I believe the government knows this and fears this and that is why they want natives to have endless tolerance and Muslims to be endlessly appeased. The unrealistic liberal idealists think they can appease their way out of the problem. They will find too late that al-Qaeda is not going to be appeased until either the whole world is under the control of al-Qaeda or all al-Qaeda are dead. How many attacks do they think the European natives will put up with before they take matters into their own hands and replace the “progressives” in government with right wing popularists who will lead them against the Islamic threat? And what danger should that bring to mind to Europe?

The main recruiting and terrorist training grounds are in Afghanistan and Pakistan but there are others  areas as well. We had better take the sanctuary States away from the terrorists before we see blood running in our own streets. Also consider this article, Bin Laden plans new attack on US.  The West needs to take off the kid gloves when dealing with domestic Islamic terrorists and the only way I know to do that is to force relocation of those who are not willing to assimilate into Western society. That means no special laws, judges, police, schools, forced marriages, dress or large ethic enclaves for Muslims. It also means that prisons become prisons and not recruitment ground social clubs. The alternative of not dealing with the problem is not Islam as some believe. Europe will never become Islamic. The people would rather become Fascist and they will become Fascist if people running western nations do not get a reality check and deal with the Islamic problem while it can still be dealt with. Otherwise, Europe will be in civil war and turned into a police state.

Report identifies UK terrorist enclaves - Telegraph

Secret enclaves of al-Qaeda extremists based in London, Birmingham and Luton are planning mass-casualty attacks in Britain, according to a leaked Government intelligence report.

The document, which was drawn up by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch, states that “some thousands” of extremists are active in the UK. They are predominantly UK-born and aged between 18 and 30, and many are believed to have been trained in overseas terrorist camps.

Under the heading “International Terrorism”, the report, which is marked “restricted” states: “For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaeda. It will face a threat from British nationals, including Muslim converts, and UK-based foreign terrorists, as well as terrorists planning attacks from abroad.”

The document also reveals that many of the terror networks operating in the UK include extremists who have been trained in terrorist camps overseas and have “some ability to construct improvised explosive devices, incorporating home-made explosives”.

It adds: “The availability of training/guidance and the necessary components to build improvised explosive devices (IED), allied with extremists’ known targeting preferences, mean that IED attacks against crowded places, intended to cause mass casualties, are the most likely form of attack in the UK.”

It is also made clear in the report that al-Qaeda cells are planning further attacks in UK with the so-called Government Security Zone (GSZ), an area which covers the Houses of Parliament, Whitehall, Buckingham and St James’ Palaces, as a possible target. The threat level in the GSZ is described in the report as “severe”.

Security officials are convinced that UK-based al-Qaeda cells will attempt to carry out another “spectacular” inside the UK with major transport termini, such as airports and train stations, being the most likely targets.

He added: “We know that subversion and support for al-Qaeda is taking place in campuses and prisons all over the UK. The fact that we have not been attacked for over two years should not be taken by anyone as evidence that the threat has gone away, in fact it is just the contrary.”

Full article

» 6 Comments

Ron Paul’s views on a coming world government

No Gravatar

For whatever you might think it is worth, here is an interview with Ron Paul that gives his views of the election and the world government that he thinks the elite will bring in through every real or made up world crises.

Ron Paul Warns Of Great Shift Toward Global Government Under Obama

Texas Congressman and 2008 presidential candidate Ron Paul has warned that the euphoria surrounding the election of Barack Obama combined with the overwhelming fear of major international crises could facilitate a cataclysmic shift toward a new world order.

“I think it is very dangerous and the first year is going to be the most dangerous year.” Paul stated. “Just think of Bush’s first year, he also had the 9/11 thing that he could use to scare everybody to death. And Obama will use the financial crisis, which will get worse, and there will be more military skirmishes around the world.” Paul asserted.

Commenting on the much touted “International crisis” that luminaries such as Colin Powell, Joe Biden and Zbigniew Brzezinski have all guaranteed will occur within weeks of Obama entering the White House, the Congressman stated that he believes it may be a catalyst for a shift toward world government:

“I think it’s going to be an announcement of a new monetary order, and they’ll probably make it sound very limited, they’re not going to say this is world government, even though it is if you control the world’s money and you control the military, which they do indirectly.”

“A world central bank, worldwide regulation and world control of the whole system, of all the commodities and all the natural resources, what else can you call it other than world government?”

“Obama wouldn’t be there if he didn’t toe the line, and when the meeting starts on November 15th for the new monetary system, this could be the beginning of the end of what’s left of our national sovereignty.” Paul said, also warning that the global media are already hailing Obama as the world’s leader.

With Obama having previously announced that he will shift military attention to Pakistan, the Congressman also warned that the president elect will, thanks to the previous administration, have the necessary precedent to escalate the war on terror:

Full article

» No Comments

Ann Coulter on the 2008 elections

No Gravatar

Ann Coulter gives her unique perspectives on the 2008 elections.

The reign of lame falls mainly on McCain

This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists. It turns out they’re not racists – they’re retards. Question: What exactly would one have to say to alienate Pennsylvanians? That Joe Paterno should retire?

For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president.

Starting tomorrow, if not sooner.

Full article

» No Comments

America divided after the election.

No Gravatar

This well thought out article points out the division that this election will bring no matter who wins. This election is going to bring division in this nation like we have never seen since the Civil War. When elections are rigged by money and media brainwashing or the media plays up lies about stolen elections how can you expect a cordial outcome? If Obama loses there will be riots and stolen election accusations by the race baiters and the media. On the Republican side we already know that the horrendous agenda of the Far Left against the middle class and Christians is going to restart the patriot movement big time. So Obama’ win is not going to bring unity to this nation either.

Something really has to be done about the press coverage of candidates in the U.S. The people running are picked by the media elite in any analysis of the facts. The elections are not fair or democratic. It is getting like Putin’s Russia where his party controls the media and the media control the minds of the people. The media influenced the outcome of this election from the start of the primaries, that is no secret. If somehow McCain should win, the media will be there to incite riots.

American Thinker: Say Goodbye to America

No matter who wins Tuesday America is going to be a different country.

When the sun rises on November 5, regardless of who the president-elect is, a more un-United States than has existed since the Civil War will wake to dispute the results of the disgusting campaign that has mercifully come to an end.

Whoever the losers, they will believe they were cheated, and will point fingers at those they believe responsible. Almost half the nation will view the winner as illegitimate, and will do everything in their power to undermine his authority as long as he’s in the White House.

With this animosity will come a new level of hatred between those of differing political persuasions like nothing our country has experienced in the modern era.

Putting it bluntly, and without sounding too much like Rev. Jeremiah “G-d Damn America” Wright, there will be no such thing as Americans anymore.

Instead, there’ll be Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives, and encounters between the members of these groups will for years nay decades be at best unfriendly, and at worst quite hostile if not downright violent.

Full article

» 9 Comments

A greater great depression may be in our future.

No Gravatar

Here is an article with lots of facts and graphs that makes it look like a great depression is likely. So maybe people should prepare like we are not getting out of this economic downturn anytime soon. In fact it looks like it is going to get a whole lot worse and the article does not even address our debt which will be a drag on the economy for a generation. Then throw in rising world unemployment and the inevitable protectionism that will be demanded and conditions do not look much different than the great depression of the 1930’s.

Think about it, housing in the U.S. is still almost double what it should be and so is the stock market. The Feds cannot lower the interest rates much more or they would be paying people to borrow money. So there is not much more they can do to stimulate the economy. I think we are in a hell of a mess that could last for decades.

So now you might know how despots get control over the world. Just look how people are panicking and throwing out all common sense on the promise of change in the 2008 election and the downturn is just getting started. Also know the socialist tax and spend policies of the Democrats will not be good for business. Maybe you better head for the hills while you still can. I know that gets kind of hard to do when you owe more on your house than it is worth but it will be worth less next year.

“Worse than the Great Depression” by Krassimir Petrov, PhD. FSO Editorial 11/02/2008

The mainstream media and Wall Street have reached the consensus that the current credit crisis is the worst since the post-war period. George Soros’ statement that ”the world faces the worst finance crisis since WWII” epitomizes the collective wisdom. The crisis is currently the ultimate scapegoat for all the economic evils that currently plague the global financial system and the global economy – from collapsing stock markets of the world to food shortages in third world counties. We are repeatedly assured that the ultimate fault lies with the Credit Crisis itself; if there were no Credit Crisis, all of these terrible things would never have happened in the economy and the financial markets.

The most extraordinary thing is that the mainstream media has never attempted to compare the current economic environment to the one preceding the Great Depression. In essence, it is assumed outright that the Great Depression can never possibly happen again, ever, thus obviating the need for such a comparison. I actually believe that the macroeconomic fundamentals today are much worse, so that we are in for a protracted period of economic depression – a depression much worse than the Great Depression, a depression that would likely be remembered in history as “The Second Great Depression” or The Greater Depression, as Doug Casey has called it so aptly. Here is why I believe that this is the case.

Full Article

» No Comments