About one half the population in the West now suffer from Global Warming Phobia to one degree or another thanks to the successful brainwashing campaign of the global governance pushers. There is now a new field called ecopsychology to treat this anxiety disorder. I would recommend that all educators and politicians be treated but the brainwashed ecopsychologists are probably training them to cope by encouraging them to become radical environmental activists.

Environmental psychotics

Out of this maelstrom, comes a new industry – “ecopsychology.”

I learned about this new trade, this new way of life, from reading the May issue of the Harper’s Index. It contained this astonishing factoid: “Minimum number of U.S. therapists who offer ‘ecopsychology’ treatment for those anxious about the environment: 102.”

But this is not a national phenomenon. This is a global trend. There are now practitioners of this pseudo-science in 23 other countries.

Are these self-styled gurus and their patients just people with too much time on their hands and not enough real-world concerns? Or do you think our cultural and governmental institutions are doing their unlevel best to breed a new generation of environmental psychotics?

I have come to the conclusion that what the government schools are teaching with regard to the so-called “climate change” is flat-out child abuse.

It looks like the Brits are finally catching on. When people realize the costs of reducing CO2 will come out of their own pocket and see that actual global warming is mostly hype they will throw the Algoreites bums out of office. Of course that will initiate a whole new set of problems with the elitists that are peddling this snake oil to establish global governance.

Green tax revolt: Britons ‘will not foot bill to save planet’ - Climate Change, Environment - The Independent

More than seven in 10 voters insist that they would not be willing to pay higher taxes in order to fund projects to combat climate change, according to a new poll.

The survey also reveals that most Britons believe “green” taxes on 4×4s, plastic bags and other consumer goods have been imposed to raise cash rather than change our behaviour, while two-thirds of Britons think the entire green agenda has been hijacked as a ploy to increase taxes.

The findings make depressing reading for green campaigners, who have spent recent months urging the Government to take far more radical action to reduce Britain’s carbon footprint. The UK is committed to reducing carbon emissions by 60 per cent by 2050, a target that most experts believe will be difficult to reach. The results of the poll by Opinium, a leading research company, indicate that maintaining popular support for green policies may be a difficult act to pull off, and attempts in the future to curb car use and publicly fund investment in renewable resources will prove deeply unpopular.

I have been saying that Al Gore is the most dangerous man alive. Read the article and you will find out the deadly kool-aid that this Gaia guru dispenses all over the world. While I am on the subject, I do not know why world leaders let Al Gore get away with the irresponsible lies that he continually makes. With only the last lie being that the storm in Myanmar was a result of man caused global warming. Al Gore continually lies and twists facts for his own end and people just drink the arsenic laced Kool_aid and help spread his dangerous concoctions.

If you are promoting what Al Gore has been saying you might want to check your own thought processes and the cult leader resister that should have been hardwired into your brain. If it is missing find help.

Arthur Robinson — Nobel Prize for Death

This current food shortage is only the beginning.

We have been down this road before. Unprincipled opportunists — falsely claiming that DDT is dangerous to the environment — managed to engineer a world-wide ban of DDT. DDT had eradicated malaria from the developed world and was well on its way to eradicating it from the less developed countries at the time this ban of DDT was instituted. The initiation of DDT use against malaria was rewarded by a Nobel Prize, and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences estimated that DDT had saved hundreds of millions of lives.

One of the principal political figures who worked to ban DDT was none other than Al Gore.

As a result of the DDT ban, more than 30 million children in Africa and Asia have died from DDT-preventable malaria, and an estimated 500 million adults are today chronically ill from this disease. The ban of DDT was the worst act of technological genocide in human history.

Now, Mr. Gore is the recognized leader of an effort to ban at least 90% of world use of hydrocarbon fuels. Once again, his claims are based upon bogus science and are motivated by personal financial and political self interest.

This is a key argument. Why all of a sudden are all governments taking action on the predictions of wacky environmentalists when they have never done it before? The answer of course is that this is not about global warming at all, it is just a means to an end for global governance. Now you know why all globalists are hyping this bogus threat and why they continue to hype it in spite of all the scientific facts to the contrary.

Environmentalists’ wacky predictions

Here are my questions: In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of manmade global cooling and the threat of an ice age and millions of Americans starving to death, what kind of government policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity? When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome? In 1939, when the U.S. Department of the Interior warned that we only had oil supplies for another 13 years, what actions should President Roosevelt have taken? Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct now that they have switched their tune to manmade global warming?

Here are a few facts: Over 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is the result of water vapor in Earth’s atmosphere. Without the greenhouse effect, Earth’s average temperature would be zero degrees Fahrenheit. Most climate change is a result of the orbital eccentricities of Earth and variations in the sun’s output. On top of that, natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined.

“The Deniers” is a book about all the renown scientists that have not joined Al Gore’s Consensus club. The real consensus is with the deniers of Al Gore’s nonsense. However, since they do not belong to the Al Gore club Gore does not acknowledge their expertise. Instead anyone outside his Consenus Club are called “flat earthers” No matter there impeccable credentials.

Meanwhile, the Consensus Club is mostly made up of those who receive funding to support the junk science hypothesis and people who have a political or monetary agenda. Meanwhile, the Consensus club has the money and power to threaten the livelihood of scientists that would like to come out and expose this fraud. But ain’t democracy wonderful today when most government representatives and media are controlled by a few power elite that have their own global governance agenda?

The scientific tipping point has been reached. Either science will now break free from these control freaks or they will just be their pawns for a disinformation campaigns to bring in total government control and regulation over everything that we do.

So my advise to scientists is that you now have the only chance you will have to break free of this power grap and to get back toward unbiased science. You might think you need to watch what you say and stay within what is allowed by the politically correct controllers but if you do that, why was it that you become a scientist in the first place? Did you really want to learn and teach truth or is it just your stairway to becoming a member of the politically correct Consensus Club. If the scientific giants of history took the route that many of our scientists are taking today we would still be in the dark ages.

Continue in the direction of kowtowing to politically controlled elitists who use you for a means to their end and you can best describe yourself as a shill of control freaks but not a scientist.

We are now at the tipping point. You have the opportunity to tip this debate back toward sanity. Or you can just go along to go along and then be responsible for tipping the earth into untold suffering and the inevitable backlash that will come against all scientists when you are exposed. Then watch the Al Gore’s blame you for the bad science. You don’t really think these people will take responsibility for their irresponsibility, do you? They will just spin it and blame it on everyone else. That is what they do. By the way, all this talk of consensus is Al Gore speak. It is team rule right out of the communist play book. The consensus of the team is all important, not truth, and no opposing voice will be heard after the consensus is agreed upon.

Now you know why they will never give it up. People bound in group think, become like a cult. They have blind faith in group consensus and circle the wagons when confronted.

The climate change deniers - - Breaking News, Political News & National Security News - The Washington Times

The debate over anthropogenic — that is, human induced — climate change, is, in other words, just a bit more complicated than Al Gore suggested on “Oprah.” Few books have captured this cognitive dissonance as well as “The Deniers,” Mr. Solomon’s essential, engrossing travelogue through the world of climate-change dissent.

In “The Deniers”‘ deniers are not the usual suspects paraded out by a media eager for Scopes Monkey Trial II: Flat Earthers’ Revenge. They aren’t blustery, ill-informed television pundits or slash-and-burn polemicists.

Rather, Mr. Solomon introduces us to legendary scientists with impeccable resumes and prestigious appointments at major universities and mainstream research institutes; thoughtful, serious professionals who, at their own professional peril, looked at one or another of the shibboleths of global warming alarmism — from the debunked “hockey stick” graphic and misread ice core samples to the amateurish or incorrect computer models and fear-mongering — and bravely refused to join the herd, profitable as that may be these days.

Likewise, Mr. Solomon’s own position as founder and executive director of the well-regarded international environmental group Energy Probe makes it considerably more difficult for opponents to shellac him as a right-wing reactionary moonlighting as an oil company stooge

NASA is now manipulating the data so that it complies with radical global warming theories. With James Hansen running the show I would not believe the revisions that NASA is now reporting. When their temperature data conflicts with the scientific data of others I certainly would not believe NASA. Frankly, when you consider the accuracy of the instruments, the recordings and the measuring station differences from 1889 until now a one degree change is about meaningless. The only reason these people are freaking is because of melting ice, rising CO2 levels and believing bad computer models. These models cannot even model past climate yet future. Higher CO2 levels historically did not mean lower earth temperatures and the ice melt may have nothing to do with overall warming of the earth. It may have more to do with natural cycles and changes in micro climates.

Does ‘climate change’ mean ‘changing data’?

NASA is not the only source of long-term temperature data used to evaluate climate change. Like NASA, the UK Meteorological Office’s Hadley Center for Climate Studies depends on a network of ground-based weather stations using thermometers. Both are limited by their number of stations, the heat-island effects on many of the sites located in urban areas, changes in thermometer types over time and the loss of station sites over the historical periods being measured. Data gathered from these systems often has to be adjusted to remove “noise” caused by the local environment so it can be standardized for analysis.

The University of Alabama at Huntsville and Remote Sensing Systems provide data gathered by Earth-observation satellites. Satellite temperature data has the advantage of being gathered across the entire surface of the Earth, except for regions near the two poles, but it is unavailable for the period prior to 1978.

How do these other data sources compare to NASA?

According to Hadley’s data, worldwide temperatures have declined since 1998 and the Earth is not much warmer now than it was than it was in 1878 or 1941.

Both the UAH and RSS satellite data agree with Hadley and show temperatures declining over the past decade with only a slight increase above the 30-year average between 1978 and 2008.

More recently, NASA temperatures indicated March 2008 was the third-warmest March in history. RSS and UAH showed the same month as only slightly above average globally and the second-coldest ever in the southern hemisphere.

As WND has previously reported James Hansen, head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, warned in 2006 “we have a very brief window of opportunity to deal with climate change … no longer than a decade, at the most” – the same week the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a report saying the U.S.’s hottest year was in the past, 1936.

More proof that the earth has entered a significant cooling period comes from the new Jason Satellite. With this in mind along with other proof that the earth is about to get significantly colder and seeing that the earth has not warmed at all in the last ten years and it cooled last year. It would just be prudent for world politicians to hold off on any carbon legislation until scientific data can actually support man cause global warming theories. Will they do that. Not likely! There is too much money and power at stake. Not to mention that they all love being sent to five star resorts to attended climate change conferences.

New Jason Satellite Indicates 23-Year Global Cooling - Guest - May 02, 08

Now it’s not just the sunspots that predict a 23-year global cooling. The new Jason oceanographic satellite shows that 2007 was a “cool” La Nina year - but Jason also says something more important is at work: The much larger and more persistent Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) has turned into its cool phase, telling us to expect moderately lower global temperatures until 2030 or so.

For the past century at least, global temperatures have tended to mirror the 20-to 30-year warmings and coolings of the north-central Pacific Ocean. We don’t know just why, but the pattern of the last century is clear: the earth warmed from about 1915 to1940, while the PDO was also warming (1925 to 46). The earth cooled from 1940 to 1975, while the PDO was cooling (1946 to 1977). The strong global warming from 1976 to 1998 was accompanied by a strong and almost-constant warming of the north-central Pacific. Ancient tree rings in Baja California and Mexico show there have been 11 such PDO shifts since 1650, averaging 23 years on length.

How many years of declining world temperature would it take now - in the wake of the ten-year non-warming since 1998 - to break up Al Gore’s “climate change consensus”?

We need more people like Lord Christopher Monckton and James Inhofe? The global warming swindle is so obvious once you hear the facts. These gentlemen are of the few in politics doing anything about getting those facts out.

As soon as the carbon control freaks use disinformation to pass costs or taxes unto the population they should be sued. If Al Gore’s propaganda film is required viewing in schools or anywhere else those requiring it should be sued. The evidence is clear that they have no proof that man is causing global warming and it will stand up in court. In contrast, Gore’s Inconvenient truth film already got shot down in court as a pack of lies.

Al Gore will not debate anyone. He knows the information he presents is Junk Science. Lets face it, certain people are in this for power and money or they just insist on having blind environmental religious faith that man has to be harming the planet. Most other people of the world have been brainwashed by the media these people control. If the people of the world ever grasped the truth about how world power brokers are going to use this to fleece and control them they would be furious.

President Bush Betrays His Friend, The Facts, and Free Enterprise, - CWN

Blankley rightly concludes, “The liberal world order will not let go of their global warming assault on free economics until hell freezes over—by which point, obviously, the global warming theory will be visibly disproven.”

President Bush needs to invite Lord Christopher Monckton to the White House for a chat. Glenn Beck interviewed Lord Monckton (a former Margaret Thatcher policy advisor from 1982-1986 and a graduate of Churchill College, Cambridge) on March 4, 2008, and allowed him to state the following: “What happened is that I looked at Al Gore’s movie with mounting horror and identified three dozen scientific errors in it. So I had a weather mate of mine who takes an interest in these matters and also had the money to pay for a court case and I said I thought this film was rubbish. Two weeks later he rang up and said he wanted to do something to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense, which is what global warming is really all about.”

To make a long story short Lord Monckton took the case to court because Al Gore’s unscientific movie was being required in all British public schools. Monckton won his court case. The court decreed that if Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth is shown, then “The Great Global Swindle” must also be shown.

Not a timid soul, Lord Monckton is also going after NASA’s James Hansen for being in bed with Al Gore both “politically and financially.” Both stand to cash in on their alarmist gospel (someone called it “garbage in and gospel out”), and the present-day Braveheart has written to the administrator of NASA, asking for a full investigation. If he gets the brush-off, he plans to appeal to the Office of the U.S. Attorney General!

Al Gore might think “the debate in the scientific community is over,” but he hasn’t seen anyone like Lord Monckton on this side of the Atlantic. Lord Monckton is presently placing catchy ads in American newspapers, asking Gore to debate him in public. As of this writing, Gore hasn’t responded. If and when he does, he needs to have W in his corner with a towel and a bucket of water. Senator James M. Inhofe will be in Lord Monckton’s corner with crumpets and tea. Stay tuned—this could be a rematch of a Joe Louis—Max Schmeling fight.

Contrary to the views of the environmental hysterics, increased carbon dioxide would actually be beneficial to life on the earth. As would global warming but there is no significant warming going on anyway due to CO2 or anything else. If you really want a green planet pump up the CO2. It is essential for plant life. If man tries to limit carbon dioxide there will be no natural benefits but the economic and social consequences will be terrible.

Roy Spencer on Carbon Dioxide on National Review Online

As a climate researcher, I am increasingly convinced that most of our recent global warming has been natural, not manmade. If true, this would mean that global temperatures can be expected to peak in the coming years (if they haven’t already), and global cooling will eventually ensue.

Just for the sake of argument, let us assume that manmade global warming really is a false alarm. In that case, we would still need to ask: What are the other negative effects of pumping more CO2 into the atmosphere?

Well, plant physiologists have known for a long time that most vegetation loves more carbon dioxide. It grows faster, is more drought-tolerant, and is more efficient in its water use. While the pre-industrial CO2 concentration of the atmosphere was only about 280 parts per million (ppm) by volume, and now it is around 380 ppm, some greenhouses pump it all the way up to around 1,000 ppm. How can environmentalists claim that helping vegetation to grow is a bad thing?

The bigger concern has been the possible effect of the extra CO2 on the world’s oceans, because more CO2 lowers the pH of seawater. While it is claimed that this makes the water more acidic, this is misleading. Since seawater has a pH around 8.1, it will take an awful lot of CO2 it to even make the water neutral (pH=7), let alone acidic (pH less than 7).

Still, the main worry has been that the extra CO2 could hurt the growth of plankton, which represents the start of the oceanic food chain. But recent research (published on April 18 in Science Express) has now shown, contrary to expectations, that one of the most common forms of plankton actually grows faster and bigger when more CO2 is pumped into the water. Like vegetation on land, it loves the extra CO2, too

I love the way scientists cover their butt. They finally acknowledge that the earth is no longer getting warmer but they hedge it by saying it will start warming again someday so we need to keep passing laws to screw up the economy of the world on their sheer speculation. These same scientists could not even tells us a year ago that the seas would cool now they want us to believe that they know the seas will start warming again a decade down the road. Believe me they haven’t got a clue. Meanwhile Al Gore is still running around the world lying to people telling everyone how fast the warming is exhilarating.

Global warming may ’stop’, scientists predict - Telegraph

Researchers studying long-term changes in sea temperatures said they now expect a “lull” for up to a decade while natural variations in climate cancel out the increases caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.

This article clearly explains much of what you need to know about the American economy. If you wonder why the economy has been reported as being so good over the years but you cannot make ends meet or find a good job this article just might clear up the matter for you. You have been lied to by your government for decades.

Now add to the facts in this article the $10 Billion and rising national debt, the over $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities coming due, rising taxes, rising food and energy prices caused by environmental radicals and carbon loons, and the cost of socialism and wars and you will understand that things are going to get much worse very soon. America’s standard of living will be less than half of what it is today within a decade.

Don’t feel too bad much of the rest of the world will do almost as bad except for the rich elite, energy exporters and developing nations with nukes.

Can you live on half of your income or worse adjusted for inflation in the future? You better start thinking about how you will do that, because you certainly will if you survive the upheavals.

Numbers Racket: Why the economy is worse than we know KEVIN PHILLIPS / Harper’s Magazine v.316, n.1896 1may2008

The real numbers, to most economically minded Americans, would be a face full of cold water. Based on the criteria in place a quarter century ago, today’s U.S. unemployment rate is somewhere between 9 percent and 12 percent; the inflation rate is as high as 7 or even 10 percent; economic growth since the recession of 2001 has been mediocre, despite a huge surge in the wealth and incomes of the superrich, and we are falling back into recession. If what we have been sold in recent years has been delusional “Pollyanna Creep,” what we really need today is a picture of our economy ex-distortion. For what it would reveal is a nation in deep difficulty not just domestically but globally.

Undermeasurement of inflation, in particular, hangs over our heads like a guillotine. To acknowledge it would send interest rates climbing, and thereby would endanger the viability of the massive buildup of public and private debt (from less than $11 trillion in 1987 to $49 trillion last year) that props up the American economy. Moreover, the rising cost of pensions, benefits, borrowing, and interest payments—all indexed or related to inflation—could join with the cost of financial bailouts to overwhelm the federal budget. As inflation and interest rates have been kept artificially suppressed, the United States has been indentured to its volatile financial sector, with its predilection for leverage and risky buccaneering.

Arguably, the unraveling has already begun. As Robert Hardaway, a professor at the University of Denver, pointed out last September, the subprime lending crisis “can be directly traced back to the [1983] BLS decision to exclude the price of housing from the CPI. . .With the illusion of low inflation inducing lenders to offer 6 percent loans, not only has speculation run rampant on the expectations of ever-rising home prices, but home buyers by the millions have been tricked into buying homes even though they only qualified for the teaser rates.” Were mainstream interest rates to jump into the 7 to 9 percent range—which could happen if inflation were to spur new concern—both Washington and Wall Street would be walking in quicksand. The make-believe economy of the past two decades, with its asset bubbles, massive borrowing, and rampant data distortion, would be in serious jeopardy. The U.S. dollar, off more than 40 percent against the euro since 2002, could slip down an even rockier slope.

The credit markets are fearful, and the financial markets are nervous. If gloom continues, our humbugged nation may truly regret losing sight of history, risk, and common sense.

Every time you go to the gas pump or pay your heating bills or food bills you can thank the environmental extremists and all the politicians that kowtow to them for the higher prices that you will now pay.
Also notice the hypocritical actions of the “environmentalists” outlined in this article.

Blame Clinton, greens for high gas prices

Environmental extremists prefer to mandate the expanded use of ethanol, rather than using abundant oil supplies. This alternative produces less energy per gallon of fuel than gasoline, while driving the price of food upward, causing riots and forcing the cultivation of more land where wildlife can no longer flourish.

Environmental extremists wring their hands and cry crocodile tears at the thought of “ruining” the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge by using only 2,000 of the 18 million acres for oil production. But they seem to have no problems with the idea of covering millions of acres in the southwest with solar panels.

Environmental extremists celebrate their victory in banning DDT to save birds. But they have no problem with miles and miles of wind turbines that slaughter millions of birds every year. Nor do they seem to have any sympathy for the millions of people who have died from malaria as a direct result of the ban on DDT.

Big oil is not to blame for the high price of gasoline; the blame must fall squarely in the lap of the environmental extremists who use propaganda and fear-mongering to block the increases in the production of readily available fossil fuels. There are sufficient reserves of coal to last about 200 years. Despite Jimmy Carter’s 1970s declaration that the world would be out of oil by 2000, and considering the anticipated increase in demand, there are enough known oil reserves to last at least 60 years. This energy should be available now.

Every time a person fills up at the pump, he should visualize the billions of barrels of oil that are waiting in Alaska, and the billions of barrels of oil that are waiting in the Dakotas and Montana, and the billions of barrels of oil that are waiting just off shore – and curse the environmental extremists who are forcing him to pay far more for his transportation than is necessary.

I think it is a bit early to say the earth is cooling and that the sunspot activity will not pick up again but like Physicist Phil Chapman said, the earth has not warmed further in the last ten years and it could now be going into a cooling period.

I do not see the logic of the counterclaim in this article that the earth is still warmer on the average then it was several decades ago. That has nothing at all to do with the claim of Chapman. He claims that the earth will now grow cooler based on sunspot theory. You people seem to imply that the earth is now too warm where it is now. Are you people really implying that the earth was better off when the earth was one degree cooler? Give me a break! The claim that brightness on the sun did not vary much says nothing about his claim either. Who is talking about brightness? You people really believe that the only solar heating factor is the sun’s brightness?

My advise is to not do anything about climate. Why make Al Gore and all his elitist friends rich at your expense and why let government take control of every aspect of your life for nothing? This is what the climate change hype is really about.

Man is so vain. Always wanting to play God without the required knowledge or wisdom and always screwing things up. Ice ages and global warming tipping points are unlikely but man’s foolish actions are quite certain.

FOXNews.com - Scientist: Forget Global Warming, Prepare for New Ice Age - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News

Sunspot activity has not resumed up after hitting an 11-year low in March last year, raising fears that — far from warming — the globe is about to return to an Ice Age, says an Australian-American scientist.

Physicist Phil Chapman, the first native-born Australian to become an astronaut with NASA [he became an American citizen to join up, though he never went into space], said pictures from the U.S. Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) showed no spots on the sun.

He said the world cooled quickly between January last year and January this year, by about 0.7 degrees Centigrade.

“This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record, and it puts us back to where we were in 1930,” Chapman wrote in The Australian Wednesday. “If the temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over.”

Hysteria is rampant and the people have become delusional. There should be a war against progressive mental illness from the halls of Time Magazine to the shores of Massachusetts and California.

From fighting evil to fighting carbon emissions

The Time cover is cheap heroism. It is a liberal attempt to depict as equally heroic those who fight carbon emissions and those who fought Japanese fascists and Nazis.

Second, for much of the left, the cover reflects the primacy of environmental concerns over moral concerns. For example, the left seemed never to care about the millions of Africans who continued to die from malaria largely because of the environmentalists’ worldwide ban on the use of DDT as pesticide. The same holds true for another left-wing environmentalist fantasy. Changing corn into biofuels is causing a surge in food prices throughout the world. The European Union continues this policy despite warnings even from some environmentalists that food shortages, starvation and food riots are imminent. But human suffering is not as significant as environmental degradation.

Third, the left is far more internationalist – global, if you will – in its orientation than national. As the Time article states, “Going green: What could be redder, whiter and bluer than that?” Whereas, for most Americans patriotism remains red, white and blue, for much of the left it is green.

Fourth, the further left you go, the more inclined you are to hysteria. From the threat of DDT to the threat of heterosexual AIDS in America to that mass killer secondhand smoke, the left believes and spreads threats that, unlike the threat of Islamic terror, really are “scare tactics.”

Time’s cover is not only disrespectful and disgraceful their global warming alarmism is absolutely insane. As evidence mounts that global warming is not the threat that some believed it to be, these loons go on a green warpath to alarmism. I guess they need to sell fear to get some green.

Iwo Jima Veterans Blast Time’s ‘Special Environmental Issue’ Cover

Time
editor tells MSNBC ‘there needs to be a real effort along the lines of
World War II to combat global warming and climate change.’

For only the second time in 85 years, Time magazine abandoned the traditional red border it uses on its cover. The occasion – to push more global warming alarmism.

The cover of the April 21 issue of Time took the famous Iwo Jima photograph by Joe Rosenthal of the Marines raising the American flag and replaced the flag with a tree. The cover story by Bryan Walsh calls green “the new red, white and blue.”

Donald Mates, an Iwo Jima veteran, told the Business & Media Institute on April 17 that using that photograph for that cause was a “disgrace.”

People are about to reap what they let the eco-nitwits start. The question that will be asked too late is why did most of the world support the nitwits junk science solutions to fix a non existent global warming problem? If people continue to allow themselves to be brainwashed and managed by these silly nitwit eco-loons, elitists and control freaks they will reap very negative consequences.

People need to teach themselves how to think for themselves and not just parrot and agree with everything they hear from the nitwits in the elitist controlled media.

FOXNews.com - Junk Science: A New ‘Green’ Body Count Begins - Opinion

Food riots caused by rising food prices have erupted around the world. Five people died in uprisings in Haiti, perhaps the first of many casualties to come from the fad of being “green.”

Food riots also broke out in Egypt, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Senegal and Ethiopia. The military is being deployed in Pakistan and Thailand to protect fields and warehouses. Higher energy costs and policies promoting the use of biofuels such as ethanol are being blamed.

“When millions of people are going hungry, it’s a crime against humanity that food should be diverted to biofuels,” an Indian government official told the Wall Street Journal. Turkey’s finance minister labeled the use of biofuels as “appalling,” according to the paper.

Biofuels have turned out to be a lose-lose-lose proposition. Once touted by the greens and the biofuel industry as being able to reduce the demand for oil and lower greenhouse gas emissions, biofuels have accomplished neither goal and have no prospect for accomplishing either in the foreseeable future.

The world has an ever-growing population that needs more and more energy, but the greens are doing everything they can to constrict the world’s energy supply.

As the Sierra Club campaigns to shut down our coal-fired electricity capabilities, the Natural Resources Defense Council campaigns to prevent nuclear power from taking its place. The demise of coal-fired power and the blockage of increased nuclear power will increase the demand for supply constraints on, and the prices for, natural gas.

But then again, environmental advocacy group Earth First perhaps is helping to alleviate the looming natural gas crisis by campaigning against power plants that use the fuel. In a recent campaign against a South Florida power plant, an Earth First campaigner stated that the environment ought not be threatened “so that people can fuel their greedy energy desires.” “Just say ‘no’ to electricity,” seems to be the bottom line of eco-think.

Al Gore’s accused people like the following of being in the flat earth society because they do not believe in his man caused Co2 driven global warming theories. Al Gore is a politician with a political agenda. These men are top scientists so who do you think is really telling the truth?

FrontPage Magazine

In Lawrence Solomon’s new book — The Deniers: The World-Renowned Scientists Who Stood up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud — and Those Who Are Too Fearful to Do So — the environmental columnist for Canada’s National Post lists a few of the “kooks” who haven’t attained Al Gore’s exalted level of scientific knowledge:

Dr. Antonino Zichichi,
a former president of the European Physical Society who discovered
nuclear antimatter and is one of the world’s foremost physicists. He
calls global warming projection models “incoherent and invalid.”

Dr. Christopher Landsea, the past
chairman of the American Meteorological Society’s Committee on Tropical
Meteorology and Tropical Cyclones. Says he: “There are no known
scientific studies that show a conclusive physical link between global
warming and observed hurricane frequency and intensity.”

Prof. Freeman Dyson, one of the world’s most eminent physicists. He asserts the models used to justify global warming alarmism are “full of fudge factors” and “do not begin to describe the real world that we live in.”

Prof. Paul Reiter, chief
of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the famed Pasteur Institute. He
notes, “no major scientist with any long record in this field” accepts
Gore’s claim that global warming spreads mosquito-borne diseases.

Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, a
world-renowned expert on the ancient ice cores used in historical
climate research. He says the U.N. “based its global-warming hypothesis
on arbitrary assumptions and these assumptions, it is now clear, are
false.”

Every so often I read the daily news and I just get feed up with the inept leaders that are running this world. They do not seem to have a collective grain of wisdom between them.

Today we read that wholesale prices are up 1.1 percent in one month! Oil is at $113 a barrel and rising and food prices have gone up so much that people in poor countries are in danger of starvation.

Now who were the idiots that suggested we make grains into alcohol to run cars? I recall that Bush signed a piece of nutty legislation that will make 20 percent of our liquid fuel alcohol. The EU and other countries are also converting grains to alcohol. Meanwhile, people in poor countries are going hungry and are in danger of starving. Great thinking guys! With leadership and thinking like that you must of slept through your education classes and especially through your leadership training. These nutty polices must be reversed now!

I know the hype coming from Al Gore, had something to do with these government polices and that is why I say Al Gore is the most dangerous man in the world. Those that follow his leading will in the end bring starvation to millions.

Since you world leaders are clueless let me tell you the solutions?

1. Stop converting grains to make alcohol to run in cars. It was never needed. It is inefficient and the world does not have food to burn! Will this increase demand on oil? Not much. Any oil shortfalls can be taken care of quite easily as I will outline below.

2. Stop paying over $100 a barrel for oil to these vultures. I would not pay more than $50. How do we do that? First we DISBAND OPEC by world or U.S. decree. It is an illegal monopoly. If anyone whats to argue about it, that is why our taxes pay for all our aircraft carrier task forces. They were built to protect us from foreign enemies. If anyone thinks paying these extortion rates for oil (from wells that we developed in the Middle East) are not a huge danger to our country they are not living in reality. By the way, “our friend” Saudi Arabia alone could pump enough additional oil to bring the world oil prices down significantly.

3. Cut through the environmental red tape and allow for oil drilling off our coasts and in Alaska. There is significant oil there. All oil companies during this national emergency should be required to reinvest most profits into new energy production until balanced energy levels are achieved.

4. Vastly expand coal production and scrap all the restrictions put on new coal plants because of the global waring nonsense. We could make liquid fuel out of coal slurry for our cars and also use coal generating plants for spare electric generation at night for charging electric cars.

5. Build some damn refineries. Not one has been built in 30 years in this country mostly due to asinine environmental regulations. Meanwhile stop the insane laws that required scores of different types of fuel and fuel additives that adds to the costs and creates spot fuel shortages. Let the refineries we have produce 5 or 6 different major fuels and not be required to make 50.

6. Stop this crazy oil speculation in the markets. They are adding a third to the price of oil and they add nothing to our economy other than gambling. It can be stopped.

7. Government Incentives for mass production of reasonable priced electric cars for city commuting.

8. A major national project to develop solar energy production. They are doing it in Israel, we can certainly do it here. Solar energy at less then 10C a KW hour is easily achievable in the Southwestern deserts with today’s technology. The above ground land area in the Nevada Nuclear Test Site alone could produce much of the electricity needs for this country at reasonable rates.

Contact your representatives in Washington and demand action.

That what the hype is all about. global governance

Plunging Into the Abyss With Al Gore and Bill Clinton, Ted Turner and Jimmy Carter - CWN

Every liberal leftwing socialist is preaching the gospel of global warming with global governance embedded in that gospel. For example, Paul Kurtz, editor of Free Inquiry and head of a major Secular Humanist organization centered in Amherst, New York, pontificates in his Humanist Manifesto 2000: A Call For A New Planetary Humanism, “Global warming is probably on the increase, in part as a consequence of deforestation in poor countries and atmospheric carbon-dioxide emissions, especially in the affluent nations.” His solution: “Nation-states must transfer some of their sovereignty to a system of transnational authority. . . . The world needs at some point in the future to establish an effective World Parliament. . . . We recommend an international system of taxation in order to assist the underdeveloped sectors of the human family and to fulfill social needs not fulfilled by market forces.”

So ask yourself if you’d mind a temperature increase of 1or 2 degrees F or C over a 100-year period which is what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration satellite data at the University of Alabama in Huntsville predicts. (See Baptist Press, March 20, 2008 article by John R. Christy.) And while the global warming crowd preaches “hardship on the poor” as an excuse to take away your SUV and allow you to bathe once a month, ask yourself this question: Wouldn’t it be better to eradicate malaria, treat a host of other diseases, and dig 10,000 water wells for the poor than to spend hundreds of billions of dollars (some estimates put the figure at trillions by 2050) fighting climate change that won’t make even a minor dent in the global temperature? It’s not difficult to answer this question!

Wow! This three part article is a must read for those with a brain left to think for themselves. Jon Ryter gives many arguments against Co2 caused global warming all the way from the history of Greenland to modern science. He also gets into the inevitable future revolution against the Red’s turned into Green’s that Ryter calls “Watermelons”. It occurs when the world finally gets the message that all the suffering brought on the world through this deliberate fraud was needless and really a means for elitists like Al Gore to take control of the world.

I don’t know if it will play out the way Jon wrote but this is a good read.

Jon Christian Ryter — Watermelons and Eco-Idiots, Part 1

The scientific reality of Greenland runs counter to the fables about Greenland generated by ecoalarmists to benefit politicians who want to persuade the gullible of the world that humankind is responsible for what the ecoalarmists believe is carbon dioxide-generated global warming. In their minds, the current warming trends in Greenland is proof positive that catastrophic flooding that —caused by man—will erase the coastal lowlands around the world within the next 100 years.

Watermelon Red

Shortly after former Vice President Al Gore, Jr. received an Oscar for his largely fabricated movie, An Inconvenient Truth, blaming what science knows to be a cyclic event caused by solar eruptions on humankind, he announced that the debate was over. Global warming was settled. While Gore may believe that scientific consensus agrees with his position, in point of fact, it does not.

Before we start looking at the scientific numbers—those who believe global warming is caused by man verses those who know it is a cyclic event caused by solar eruptions—and the physical evidence that disputes the ecoalarmists, it is important for the layman to understand one simple truth about global warming: green is the new red. Yesterday’s socialists are today’s environmentalists. Green is the anti-capitalist, antihuman agenda of the Vietnam Era far left hippies who finally overthrew the Rooseveltian democracy of the 1930s and 40s beginning in 1992 when the politically-correct antiwar hippies Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton came to Washington and their vice president, Al Gore, became the doomsday Prophet of Utopia.

They have no scientific facts to support the Left driven Co2 warming hysteria. They will not accept scientific facts when it is presented to them. So perhaps the next step is to exposed the real reasons for this fraud on the world. When the truth is exposed these blackbirds will be put in cages. Then all the pigeons following them will fly away looking for new refuse piles to scavenge.

American Thinker: The slick trick behind global frauding

In Stalin’s Russia any dissenter from the Party Line was guilty. Innocence had to be proved. It’s a standard tyrant’s trick. During the reign of Oliver Cromwell in England, witchhunters did not have to prove that their victims were guilty. The accused witches had to prove their innocence.

That’s what Al Gore has done to science: He and his friends have flipped innocence and guilt from normal science to Stalinist science.

In Al Gore’s America, any “global warming denier” is guilty until proven innocent. He or she must have been bought off by Big Oil. Skeptics, no matter how well-qualified, must prove the negative about really silly alarmist hogwash. And whenever some prediction is falsified, the warm mongers have an explanation: it’s just a temporary glitch in the data. Oh, yes, we were wrong about 1998, but just wait till 2050! The excuses are endless.

There are no facts robust enough, consistent enough, and verified enough to support the mass hysteria. The climate system is hypercomplex, nonlinear and poorly understood. The media spinners are immensely ignorant about real science, and just care about the next scare headline. There’s a lot of wild speculation and a mob of self-serving politicians, bureaucrats and media types who stand to gain a ton of power and money by suckering millions of taxpayers. Al Gore just started a 300 million dollar PR campaign to convince everybody. When was the last time you saw 300 million bucks being spent to promote a scientific hypothesis that was already proven? We’re not spending millions to prove the existence of gravity. The uproar and money involved in this fraud is in direct proportion to the lack of solid facts.

The last ten years have seen global cooling, not warming.

Al Gore apparently lost his marbles after his loss to George Bush in the Presidential election. I hear he then went into his basement and found some old slides and found a purpose for his life putting together this junk science snake oil presentation. For that effort he got awarded the Nobel Peace prize that has a history of going to snake oil salesmen.

Al Gore’s main expertise is running around the world saying the sky is falling and calling scientists who disagree with him childish names. That is about the entire extent of Algoreism from its dank beginning until he finally catches exposure due to global cooling.

To really embrace Algoreism you have to be one or a combination of the following: in it for the money - gullible - brainwashed - power hungry - a politician - or a pagan trying to appease mother Gaia.

‘Algoreism’ For the Masses - HUMAN EVENTS

And to bust the scientific consensus myth altogether, Lawrence Solomon’s new book “The Deniers” shines the light on many famous scientists who are not in lockstep. We’re talking people like Prof. Hendrik Tennekes, director of research at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, and Dr. Antonino Zichichi, the man who discovered nuclear antimatter.

These are scientists possessed of incredible intellects. And yet, Algoreism holds that they should be treated as pariahs. We already HAVE a consensus; we do not need any more research, studies or opinion. Under Algoreism, the discussion is therefore ended and the time has come to start confiscating anything that contributes to the “reality” of Global Warming.

Say goodbye to your SUV, your pickup, your lawnmower, your gas grill — just about anything that makes life worth living. Prepare for $10 per gallon gasoline — if you can get it at all. In fact, under the tenants of Algoreism, everything will cost more and there will be less of it. But you shouldn’t worry because the earth’s fever will go away and government will take care of you. The government will give you what you need and the old pleasures of life will soon be forgotten.

This documented week of happenings proves that evil is the greatest danger to the world not global warming. This article actually only touched on a fraction of the evils happening on earth in one week. Multiply it by a million and you would still would not get close to documenting all the evils going on this world in just one week period.

What’s worse: Human evil or global warming?

I am convinced that human evil is so great that most people choose either to ignore it or to focus their concerns elsewhere – like those who believe that human-created carbon dioxide emission, not human evil, poses the greatest threat to mankind. No one will ever get killed for fighting global warming. Fighting evil, on the other hand, is quite dangerous.

Although I do not agree that Co2 is causing global warming I do agree with the other points in this article. The overreaction to climate change by the European Union could have much more serious consequences than any possible man caused warming.

FT.com / Comment & analysis / Comment - A foolish overreaction to climate change

The first is that the European Union, which already has the bit between its teeth on this issue, will severely damage its own economy by deciding to set an example to the world. And the second is that it will seek to limit that damage, as President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and others are already urging, by imposing trade barriers against those countries that are not prepared to accept mandatory cuts in their emissions.

A lurch into protectionism, and the rolling back of globalisation, would do far more damage to the world economy in general and to the developing countries in particular than could conceivably result from the projected resumption of global warming.

It is high time this folly ended.

One reason the message cannot get out that increasing Co2 is not causing more global warming are these self appointed news censors. People should contact BBC to let them know what they think about this slanted reporting of the news.

BBC Caught Editing Story To Appease Global Warming Lobbyist

“It would be better if you did not quote the sceptics,” she writes, “Their voice is heard everywhere, on every channel. They are deliberately obstructing the emergence of the truth.”

Abbess threatens the writer again that he will be the target of a campaign on behalf of the environmentalists, stating, “You may appear in an unfavourable light because it could be said that you have had your head turned by the sceptics.”

This article gives some fine examples why global warming models are stupid. They are dumber than blond models on spring break. You cannot have good computer projection models if you do not have the knowledge to enter into the model nature’s production of CO2 or nature’s consumption of CO2.

We are not even close to understanding atmospheric science so it is only vanity to pretend that we can predict and control long term climate. It is better left to nature, God already built in very good checks and balances into our atmospheric system, it is self correcting. All of man’s laws will not have one percent of the control over our earth atmospheric system then will natural forces out of man’s control.

Man’s actions with his very limited knowledge will just cause catastrophes, as it already has. It is bringing disruptions in energy and bringing high food prices to the poor, and the loony control freaks have just gotten started. Thinking man knows the best climate for the earth and that he can control it is vanity and it will turn out to be a very expensive exercise in delusion and futility. The main thing it will actually accomplish is to give power over our lives to the looniest, faithless control freaks on our planet.

American Thinker: Vanities of the Warmists

The “progressives” and their “grand thoughts” of the age seek to “manage” the globe in the same “modern” way our ancestors “managed” Yellowstone. Like our ancestors of yore, today’s environmentalists believe the government can control the environment better than Mother Nature can. Are we to suppose that the people who give us the DMV and the IRS are going to “manage” the globe in the same efficient and benevolent manner? In the grand scheme of things are we supposed to believe that we humans are actually better than Mother Nature at “managing” the global environment? For some reason, the enviro-nazis of the age seem to believe that Mother Nature is some kind of octogenarian Alzheimer’s patient and they’re the designated colostomy bag.

“The result is that we’re trying to base policy on flawed models that are no better than ancient shamans reading tea leaves. The enviro-nazis are no better than the medicine man of lineage ancient during a lunar eclipse who could claim that the great night spirit was eating the moon goddess, and if only the tribal elders would hand over the virgins he’d perform his incantations and make him spit her out again.”

I love it. Here is a real solution to all these CO2 reduction conferences and a way of getting the message out to debunk the CO2 global warming threat.

Scientists need to sign up for these conferences and then have the guts to tell them the truth instead of what they were expecting to hear at the conference.

This scientist showed up and said they better start worrying about global cooling. The man has real guts, my hat is off to David Archibald.

World needs more CO2, environment confab told

You could have heard a pin drop at the Hong Kong conference designed to persuade the airline industry to cut back on its production of so-called greenhouse gases to fight “global warming.”

The “Greener Skies 2008″ conference had just heard from David Archibald, a solar scientist asserting that climate change is mostly dictated by solar cycles, not carbon dioxide levels, as conventional wisdom suggests.

Archibald didn’t just tell the group not to worry about carbon dioxide emissions. He told those gathered they should figure out ways of increasing CO2 output. “In a few short years, we will have a reversal of the warming of the 20th century,” Archibald warned, according to CargoNews Asia. “There will be significant cooling very soon. Our generation has known a warm, giving sun, but the new generation will suffer a sun that is less giving, and the earth will be less fruitful. Carbon dioxide is not even a little bit bad – it’s wholly beneficial.”

One observer at the February conference said there would have been fewer jaws dropping had Archibald stripped off his clothes before the assembled.

Rising CO2 warms the lips of global hucksters.

The Chilling Truth about Global Warming: Reality Check #2 - CWN

The money is in global warming because it’s being pushed by a political agenda that wants power. They want power in Washington, power on the international stage, power over economic development, power over international monetary decisions, and power over energy. In short, power over the motor world. It’s driven by literally thousands of large and small non-governmental organizations (NGOs) sanctioned by the United Nations, and implemented by a horde of bureaucrats, university academics and an ignorant but pliable news media.[2]

So we are going to hear climate change lies on the TV all over the nation for at least the next three years. Where is the balanced on this? How are the scientists that oppose Al Gore’s junk science hype going to come up with money to inform the people that they are being lied to and brainwashed? Even if they could come up with the money what large news Media would play it?

I hear people say that the science that is coming out will expose Al Gore and the rest of his loons and stop this multi trillion dollar carbon tax scheme. I simply do not think it will be quite that easy. With this kind of money and control of the media these people will have the money to keep their global governance scheme going in spite of the truth. At that point stopping this lie will be no easier than stopping the lie about evolution.

It does not help that every whore in politics and in Religion has prostituted themselves to these globalists. Pat Robertson over the years has proven that he is a false prophet and that he does not hear from God (contrary to what he tells people and his gullible followers believe). Now this ninny says that we need to save the planet? I have news Pat, we can’t save the planet. Jesus will.

Then there is Newt and all three people running for president. Everyone of them are globalists. So what should we expect from them? They would not be in national politics if they did not have backing from the elite of the globalist CFR.

The Liberals believe that man must save the planet because the only force for change on earth in their ungodly minds come from man. God exists they say but they deny He has any identify or power other than man.

So the question then becomes what do those who are not brainwashed do about this blatant misinformation campaign? Scientific reports are not getting anywhere because the national media will not report them. Debunking Al Gore’s and the UN’s data is not getting anywhere because the media ignores it. Pretty soon this CO2 driven climate change is going to be true no matter if we can even prove that the earth is cooling. They will then just say that CO2 is causing that.

I think the people who are still not brainwashed have about one year to get the message out about this hoax or it will be too late. The lies will become the only truth allowed and anyone who says anything different will be labeled as dangerous. Al Gore already set us up for that label on 60 minutes when he equated us with flat earth people. As this ad campaign goes on they will start attacking the non believers of their religion more and more.

The only solution is to to immediately find some big money to counter these ads and we need money to fund science that debunks their huge global warming paid staff. For that to happen we need some wealthy people and foundations to start putting up money to stop them. If it does not happen in a few years you will be paying extra for everything you buy and much of that money will be going to pay for global government and the control freaks that will do nothing but make new rules for you to live by. Do I actually think that people care enough to stop these lies. No.

Gore launches $300 million campaign - Mike Allen - Politico.com

Former Vice President Al Gore is launching a $300 million, bipartisan campaign to try to push climate change higher on the nation’s political agenda.The three-year campaign by the Alliance for Climate Protection will begin Wednesday with network television advertising that will include “American Idol” and other non-traditional shows that reach a non-news audience.

The debut ad, “Anthem,” is posted here.

Pat Robertson and Al Sharpton just filmed an ad for the We Campaign, sitting on a couch on the beach. In the ad, now being produced, they say that while they may not agree on many things, they do agree that they have to work to save the planet.

A future couple in the “strange bedfellows” or “unlikely alliances” spots will be recorded soon: Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Republican former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

The campaign aims to harness the growing awareness of the climate crisis and turn it into one of the top issues on which voters make decisions.

What total idiots. Tthey are planning to decree a tariff on the world’s poorest people and they think that China and India will have no means to retaliate? Put a 17 percent carbon tariff on China’s goods and they just might solve the world’s delusional climate problem by putting an EMP over the U.S. and Europe and reducing the world’s CO2 emissions by over 50 percent in just one year. The people claiming to save the world from non existent man caused global warming will end up losing it through their stupid delusional fascist policies.

Possible U.S. carbon tariff may affect growth: report

The West’s next weapon in the fight against global warming may be a carbon tariff on imports from the developing world, a strategy that could have a profound impact on the global economy, a new report argues.

When I first heard about the media reporting about the breaking off the Antarctic ice I said to myself they are ignoring the real facts but I figured I would wait until someone published the facts. You will find the real facts about the Antarctic ice pack right here in this article.

All you heard from the media was that a huge iceberg broke off and it was suggested to be further proof of rapid global warming but what they have not told you is that the Antarctic ice pack has been rapidly growing and was at record levels in 2007. Also temperatures have been dropping on the bulk of the continent for 35 years.

It would be nice to get some balanced reporting from the media for a change but that will not happen as long as people with hidden agendas control the news networks.

This is a good article to catch up on the truth on what is happening in the Antarctic and in the science that is debunking man-caused global warming myth.

.: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.

Yet, if only the media would spend a moment to get beyond the hype and alarmism, they would discover that scientists are already thoroughly debunking the media characterization of the “melting” Antarctic. [Note: 2007 and now 2008 are overwhelmingly turning into the “tipping points” for climate alarmism as new peer-reviewed studies continue to debunk rising CO2 fears, a U.S. Senate minority report reveals over 400 scientists dissented from man-made climate fears, and more and more scientists continue in 2008 to declare themselves skeptical of a man-made climate “crisis.”The Earth’s failure to continue warming has also confounded promoters of man-made climate fear.

Here is a sampling of inconvenient developments for climate alarmists in 2008 alone: 1) Oceans Cooling! Scientists puzzled by “mystery of global warming’s missing heat”- LINK 2) New Data from NASA’s Aqua satellite is showing “greatly reduced future warming projected as a consequence of carbon dioxide.”- LINK 3) Former NASA Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer found not one peer-reviewed paper has ‘ruled out a natural cause for most of our recent warmth’ – LINK 4) UN IPCC in ‘Panic Mode’ as Earth Fails to Warm, Scientist says – LINK 5) UN IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri “to look into the apparent temperature plateau so far this century.”- LINK 6) New scientific analysis shows Sun “could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth’s average temperature” – LINK & LINK. 7) An International team of scientists released a March 2008 report to counter UN IPCC, declaring: “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” – LINK MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen’s new analysis finds the Earth has had “No statistically significant warming since 1995.”

It is really scary to think that such a bozo like Al Gore could be the next leader of the free world should the democrats deadlock.

There is quite a difference between those who do not believe in Al Gore’s man caused glo