Nothing like Liberal unity to bring everyone together. They even recognize the fascist ways of their own party.

Backlash: 2 million angry Democrats reject Obama?

More than two million angry Democrats are rejecting Sen. Barack Obama as the likely Democratic nominee for the presidency this year, according to a new protest organization.

“I hate to use this word but it’s fascist, and that’s the approach they’re taking to silence any Hillary Clinton supporters,” Will Bower, co-founder of PUMA/Just Say No Deal, an exploding coalition of voters who say they have raised $10 million in just days to pay down Clinton’s campaign debt.

“Barack Obama wants to give his acceptance speech in a stadium because he intends to minimize any pro-Hillary supporter dissent. It’s not because he wants to include more people. He knows that if they pull any shenanigans at convention, the Hillary delegates will walk out, and they don’t want that to be seen or heard. They’re bringing as many Obama supporters as they can to fill that stadium. It’s fascism,” he said.

Now more than two million, based on donation and other records, are determined to protest the nominating process and push for an open convention in Denver this August.

“The seeds of discontent for the birth of the PUMA/Just Say No Deal movement were planted during Barack’s poor performances at the debates, the media assault on Clinton after Iowa, Obama’s arrogance on the campaign trail, and the DNC’s selective application of its own rules,” Bower explained.

Bower said Hillary supporters were so incensed with the DNC’s action they wrote about it at their blogsites. The issue went viral, spreading rapidly across the Internet. One irate blogger came up with the acronym PUMA after blogging “Party Unity, My A**.” The abbreviation eventually evolved into the puma cat logo used at multiple sites.

It took only days for PUMA and dozens of other grassroots organizations and political activists to discover one another and convene a conference call. They agreed to band together and call the movement Just Say No Deal.

It would be a fitting way to lose a nation. The most unqualified and most Far Left President in the history of the nation would nominate the most unqualified perverse person ever nominated to the Supreme Court and be ratified by the most amoral Senate in the the history of this nation. Only then when the Far Left controls all three branches of our government will the amoral majority in this nation get the government they asked for and deserve and the moral minority will then have ample reason to reject these reprobates and start their own nation. Will it start in Oklahoma or Utah?

Clinton loses one nomination to possibly gain another? (OneNewsNow.com)

A leading legal journalist believes that if Barack Obama wins the presidency in 2008, he might appoint Hillary Clinton to the U.S. Supreme Court – much to the chagrin of at least one pro-family legal expert. (see related story)

Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, penned a column for USA Today suggesting the possibility that Obama might put Clinton on the nation’s high court. Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, quips that if Senator Clinton (D-New York) were to be appointed, he would have to clear his throat just to say “Justice Clinton.”

“… [T]his particular notion of Hillary Clinton being a justice on the United States Supreme Court is absolutely scary because we know, indeed, that she’s not going to follow the rule of law,” says Staver. “She’s going to be ideologically driven — and we know which way her ideology leans.”

This is a good article on the progression of federal government control in the U.S. from 1900 until now. The article title really does not do it justice. It is much more than just about the IRS. The article should make one thing clear. We do not fear the communists any more because we have evoluted to embrace the communist manifesto. Anyway, these figures do not lie. We are paying the federal government to take more and more control over every aspect of our lives and if we elect Hillary or Obama we might as well put up statutes of Karl Marx and Stalin in the Capital City and let the cooked frogs change the name from Washington D.C. to Croaking R. We.

American Thinker: The Taxpayer Frog In the IRS Pot

At the beginning of last century, communism was considered so bad by our liberal and Democratic President Woodrow Wilson and the Democratic Congress at time that they passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts and authorized Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer to conduct the “Palmer raids” to fight it - the original “Red Scare”. I would say that was equivalent to frogs jumping out of the water because they felt the heat immediately.

But the heat has been turned up slowly so that today communism is not even feared. In fact it is taught in our best universities by communists. By the end of the 20th century, a third of the voting age population in the U.S. thought the phrase “to each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities” was in the U.S. Constitution, and another third were not sure. (The phrase came from Karl Marx, author of The Communist Manifesto.) The Communist Party USA openly advocates to “defeat McCain and strengthen Democratic majorities in Congress” and to elect either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in 2008.

The CPUSA itself says electing more Democrats helps the Communist cause. And we frogs think it’s comfortable in here.

This is an interesting perspective with quite a bit of truth. What I understand from the figures in this article and from what I knew before I read this article is that the world is not capable of ruling themselves through democracy. The schools and media have educated the world to be stupid. Therefore the world still needs the educated elite to run the world for them because they haven’t got a clue. By the way, that is what the ruling elite also believe and that is why democracy is a facade put on by the elite to appease the dumbed down commoners.

American Thinker: Who’s Your Daddy? The Psychology of Most People’s Voting

Some voters still embrace their personal freedom and the responsibility that comes along with it. They study the issues and they vote on the issues. But sadly, they are a distinct minority. Don’t expect the American people to vote on issues. They almost never do. My guess is that more people will vote on how the candidate looks than what the candidate thinks. They vote for whoever meets their personal psychological needs. Thus someone like John McCain can lead the Republican Party even though the “party’s issues” run contrary to his thinking.

Most people don’t like Hillary and can’t imagine her as a parent figure, unless it is the ‘Mommy Dearest’ type.

Obama isn’t old enough to inspire parental psychological needs and the religious mass movement that is driving his campaign will probably falter because of weak faith.

McCain is a hero parent who will protect us from danger, and most people like him. Most Republican voters will overlook his policy positions, just like they overlooked strong and protective Rudy Giuliani’s liberalness. Unless McCain screws up and shows signs of being a bad Dad, McCain will probably win.

The amazing thing is how many Americans see nothing wrong with
Hillary’s amoral beliefs.

Carey Roberts — Hillary’s Scheme to Revamp the Traditional Family

no surprise, Hillary Clinton’s vision for families is, might we say, unconventional. And it’s not just her opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment that would define marriage as the union between a man and a woman.Back when she was a student at Yale Law School, Hillary wrote in the Harvard Educational Review that “marriage, slavery, and the Indian reservation system” constitute dependency arrangements that must be abolished. Ridiculing the notion that families are “private, nonpolitical units,” she demanded that we “remodel” the time-honored institution.

Two decades later she wrote It Takes a Village, the socialist manifesto that justifies governmental intrusion into the most intimate aspects of family life.

Hillary has already marched in a “gay” pride parade when she was First Lady of the United States. I recall she was marching right behind men in thongs. Now she wants to do it as President. Is this the dignity we want in a President?  Watch out though, Obama is trying his best to kiss up to the homosexuals as well. Perhaps he will become the first president to march in thongs. What a touching thought. Brings tears to my eyes.

Senator Clinton: I want to be first U.S. president to march in gay pride parade (OneNewsNow.com)

However, one presidential candidate has made a pledge to do just that – Senator Hillary Clinton (D-New York). She says that Clinton made her pledge in the Washington Blade – a Washington newspaper serving the homosexual community. “…Really now! We’ve seen these gay pride parades in San Francisco and elsewhere,” exclaims Donnelly. “Is this really an appropriate role for the President or the Commander in Chief of our armed forces? I don’t think so…”

A am waiting for the The liberally twisted red letter Bible to come out. It will be all red.

Democratic Scripture twisting

Forget Islamic radicals blowing up bodies when we have leaders and media who think it is hateful and wrong to defend and protect our children from sexual indoctrination, sexual agendas and false history. We blow their minds up already well before their bodies might blow up due to an Islamic-radical attack. At least if some of the anti-God and anti-American thugs can get our kids’ minds twisted in time, our children can fall apart with a well-funded STD. Hillary and Obama will make sure our diseased children are cared for. That is, the kids who have survived through the sea of abortions. I’m certain there must be Scriptures supporting abortion with Obama and Hillary’s Bible bak-masking machine.

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under
the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist
program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever
knowing how it happened.”
– Norman Thomas, American socialist

Sure enough it was a prophetic statement. Socialism is now undoubtedly becoming the American system.
If we elect Hillary or Obama there can be no argument that America will have become a socialist nation. The same socialists that were rioting in the streets and embracing Mao in their youth are increasingly running this country.

Don’t believe it? Read the article.

Full article

Ann Coulter makes some good points. Hillary may be the best man for the job.

Here is the way I see it. If McCain gets elected he will destroy the Republican party because the conservatives will leave. If a democrat gets elected the country will be ready for conservative leadership after the four years of disaster that the Liberals will bring this nation.

One thing I do know, if McCain gets elected and the nation goes in disaster there won’t be any hope coming from the Republicans.

The Rev. Jerry Falwell once remarked that his people would rather vote for Beelzebub than Hillary Clinton.

He didn’t mention John McCain.

Pat Buchanan says if McCain is the nominee, the Republican Party will lose its soul. I’m more worried about the Republican Party losing its mind.

“In 2006 - the most recent year for which ratings are available - McCain’s ACU rating was 65. That year, the ACU rating for the other senator from Arizona, Jon Kyl, was 97. Even Chuck Hagel’s ACU rating was 75, and Lindsey Graham’s was 83.

Since 1998, only four Republican senators have had worse ACU scores than John McCain - and none were from Goldwater country: Lincoln Chafee, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter. The last time McCain ranked this far down in his class, he was at the Naval Academy.”

Full article

All I can say for sure is that the clip from this article that I posted is true. If all of what is said in this article about John McCain actually is proven to be true he will never become president and he should be jailed.

clipped from www.worldnetdaily.com “I’d rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we’ll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility.”How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase wack job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses “profit” as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes “stopping global warming” is worth destroying the American economy, won’t drill ANWR, won’t appoint strict constructionist justices, won’t protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage? Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

Is this the maturity level that people of the United States deserve? Reality TV Boston Legal?

clipped from youdecide08.foxnews.com Obama told the former first lady he was helping unemployed workers on the streets of Chicago when “you were a corporate lawyer sitting on the board at Wal-Mart.” Moments later, Clinton said that she was fighting against misguided Republican policies “when you were practicing law and representing your contributor … in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago.”

This author seems to assume that it has to be Obama and Huckabee running against each other. If that is the case I agree with his views. However, I think McCain and Hillary can still be the nominations of their party and that would change the equation a bit and things will not be so clear.

“This year we shall know once and for all if we are a Christ honoring nation or not. Yahweh will be honored. But whether we are the brunt of Yahweh’s Mercy being justified in our rebellion or whether our nation brings God Glory willingly is going to be seen very soon in the actions of our people election day. All I ask of the men in this nation is that we all remain calm as we look to Jesus for His guidance”

Political Punch: “One of the knocks on Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, by her opponents is that she takes credit for things she shouldn’t”

Anyone seeing a pattern here among the leading candidates?

A wife of a disgraced president with loose morals who makes things up.
A purpose driven preacher that loves big government who says he has a theology degree but does not.
A Mayor with loose morals who is against illegals but pandered to them when He was in office
A Governor that flip/flopped on social issues, tries to act like a Christian but is really a local leader in a demonic cult.
A first term Senator that used cocaine and who knows what else and has nothing to offer us except socialism with a smile.
A lawyer who got filthy rich on questionable class action law suits and that is more socialist then Hillary.

You would think they we could do better then this.

A Sub-Prime Example Of Government Exploiting Tragedy - Guest - Dec 09, 07: “At what age do we lean how to multiply, add and subtract in the government schools? Because those are the only three skills one needs in order to figure out what they can and cannot afford based on how much income we have coming though the door. What is Hillary implying? That America is filled with a bunch of adults who aren’t smarter than a fifth grader? You bet she is. And so is every other politician that is seeking government solutions to solve problems best solved by the free markets and our inalienable right to fail. But isn’t that always the way the left works? They claim that the unwashed masses are just not capable of handling their own affairs without their benevolence. Enter government on its white stallion to save us! How convenient – for them.”

Something about Hillary - - The Washington Times, America’s Newspaper: “One of the most intriguing and persistent questions of the 2008 presidential race is this: Why isn’t Hillary Clinton, the Democratic front-runner, running away with it?”

The real question is why is a woman with her lack of experience and her questionable history in the running at all? That Hillary is even in the running shows that the democrats do not have anyone electable in leadership.

She’s No Morgenthau - New York Times: ““She hasn’t accomplished anything on her own since getting admitted to Yale Law,” wrote Joan Di Cola, a Boston lawyer, in a letter to The Wall Street Journal this week, adding: “She isn’t Dianne Feinstein, who spent years as mayor of San Francisco before becoming a senator, or Nancy Pelosi, who became Madam Speaker on the strength of her political abilities. All Hillary is, is Mrs. Clinton. She became a partner at the Rose Law Firm because of that, senator of New York because of that, and (heaven help us) she could become president because of that.””

Monica would be the next most qualified, she spent a lot of time in the Oval Office working with Bill.

Devvy Kidd — A closer look at the 2008 presidential candidates

Devvy Kidd has a long list here of what Americans need to know about but either don’t seem to give a damn about, or won’t get off their butt to do anything about. I suggest you read this and ask yourself, are these the leaders you want to lead this nation? Is the America we have become the America you really want? If so, welcome to socialist slavery under the global governance of the secular humanist elitists. If not, work to take back America.

Book details media ‘whitewash’ of Hillary Clinton scandals (OneNewsNow.com): “According to Bozell, an examination of past Clinton scandals reveals ‘over and over again’ that it was not Bill Clinton, but Hillary Clinton at the center of the controversies. But he is convinced that because Mrs. Clinton has so many ‘cheerleaders’ in the press, she is rarely asked tough questions and charges against her are not thoroughly investigated. ‘Every single time she gets caught in a scandal — [and] we document this [in the book] — a wall is built between her and the American people’ that prevents the truth getting out, he says. ‘And if a story does come out somehow, immediately the tables are turned and whoever came up with the story is the person who’s put on trial.’”

The Media has helped brainwash a lot of people about Hillary. If the truth is ever fully exposed Liberal media will pay a huge price and Hillary will be doing time.

Hillary will Save Us - HUMAN EVENTS: “Senator Hillary Clinton says that if elected president she will promptly commit the United States to a Kyoto Protocol “Round II”. She would strike a deal in 2010, which she says, somehow accelerates global salvation because, though Kyoto expires at the end of 2012, “we cannot afford to wait two more years.””

‘24′ producer: Hillary as president is ‘nuts’ - - The Washington Times, America’s Newspaper: ” “Mr. Surnow told a group of reporters and bloggers in a wide-ranging interview during the Young America’s Foundation’s West Coast Leadership Conference. ‘Are we nuts thinking Hillary Clinton could be president of this country? Honest to God, just stand back and think about it.’”

I have thought about it. The thought is as loony as any of the other Democrats running for President.

Hillary Clinton: A Bilderberg Presidency: “‘European elite back Democratic frontrunner…Hillary will be good for America… we’ll be very pleased that she’s president.’ — Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Portfolio magazine, October 5, 2007″

Clinton Sees Opportunity in Climate Woes: “The climate crisis is also one of the greatest economic opportunities in the history of our country,’ she said. ‘It will unleash a wave of innovation, create millions of new jobs, enhance our security and lead the world to a revolution in how we produce and use energy.’ Global warming hits particularly hard at the poor, she said. ‘One in four low-income families have already missed a mortgage or rent payment because of rising energy costs,’ Clinton said”

What total hypocrisy. Hillary tells us that the non climate crises is the greatest economic opportunities in the history of our country? if they go through with their climate change plans they will cause a world depression.

Global warming has not hit the poor hard in spite of what Hillary claims. What unbelievable nonsense she spouts! The rise in energy prices has nothing to do with Global warming. If anything, global warming, (if there were any) would ease the use of oil.

However, Hillary’s backing of global warming legislations will hit the poor very hard when their energy bills rise due to carbon legislation that also would make the cost of all products they buy rise. It amazes me how these politicians can say the exact opposite of the truth and never be held accountable for what they say. I would like to put one of her planned windmill farms in her back yard and she would not be so smug.

Hillary would lead you to believe that she can create 5 million new jobs out of thin air? No, Hillary would create them by taxing the hell out of us to pay for those jobs. Higher taxes would create less productivity and a loss of jobs that will far exceed any gain. I do not know why some want a silly old woman that lies to our face and that has little experience to govern us?

There is no question that Global warming legislation will bring lower standards of living for the poor and middle clause. Anyone who suggests else wise ought to be selling used cars to suckers rather than running for president.

Oklahoma! - Citizen Conservative - Nov 01, 07: “That is so because U.S. District Judge James H. Payne denied a request for a Preliminary Injunction against H.B. 1804, Oklahoma’s common sense bill for dealing with the out-of-control invasion by illegal aliens. As a result, H.B. 1804 is now the law of the land in Oklahoma. Let the self-deportations and state-assisted deportations begin! Are you listening Eliot Spitzer and Hillary Clinton?”

Spitzer and Hillary are not listening. They are too busy trying to get illegals into New York state so they will vote Democrat.

Of course you do know if Hillary or any major from New York gets elected to become President, Oklahoma is going to have to secede from the Union? They will find a way to overturned your state immigration law.

When you become a new country leave some room for me.

Dave Daubenmire — Hillary Can’t Win: “Hillary Clinton cannot win and they all know it. This election is not about her, it is about Rudy. The forces at work want Rudy to live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. There is no way any clear-thinking conservative would ever vote for him and the “men from U.N.C.L.E.” know that. He is pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, anti-gun, and a scallywag in his personal life. But he can beat Hillary, at least that’s what all of the “experts” say. And that is the goal, you know, beating Hillary. Hillary is the wolf, “she’ll huff and she’ll puff…” Please Rudy rescue us from the wolf!”

I wrote back last December that we needed to keep our eye on the ball. That something was at work “behind the curtain.” I thought then that John McCain would lead a revolt out of the Republican Party and throw the election to Hillary. Forty-three percent was the most she could ever get. Her husband never reached fifty. McCain is toast, so I have re-evaluated the game plan. It is Rudy they want. Hillary makes Rudy the “lesser of two evils” they hope the “three little pigs” will choose.

If the coach is right that the elite want Rudy as President, it will be because they think it is time for the US to have a Fascist dictator.

WorldNetDaily: ‘It’s for NY to decide if Hillary can lead military’: “The question came from Les Kinsolving, WND’s correspondent at the White House. He asked: ‘When the president posthumously awarded our nation’s highest military honor to Navy SEAL Lt. Michael Murphy of New York, Sen. [Charles] Schumer of New York was present. But New York’s other U.S. senator was absent, ‘campaigning in California,’ her office explained. And my question: Does the White House believe that any political campaigning justified this New York candidate for … commander-in-chief of our armed forces being absent from this ceremony for a killed-in-action U.S. Navy hero?’ “

When Hillary’s campaign schedule is more important than honoring a national hero it shows her lack of moral character. All who honorably served in the military should be insulted. Should someone so disliked by our military be elected to be their Commander-in-Chief?