I guess you heard the reports that there would be a record ice melt at the North Pole this year and how bad things are getting at the poles. Don’t believe everything you read or see on the global warming bought and paid for media. The latest reports came from someones delusions.

Chicken Little and the North Pole Icecap - HUMAN EVENTS

Here’s the deal, folks: the planet as a whole is cooling and is projected to do for decades. The Antarctic has 1 million square kilometers more ice than a year ago when it set an ice record. It is warming at one pole, the one up north, which is not greenhouse warming, which would be a warming at both. Yet the northern hemisphere has 1 million square kilometers more ice than it did last year at this time. World sea ice is at or near a modern high, despite modern measurements beginning in the coldest decade of the past century. You can look these things up. It’s called climate. Which changes. Always.

This article points out how global warming hype at the UN is a political process not any scientific consensus that man is causing climate change. It is a top level scheme for global taxation. Much the same is being done in the major industrial nations. The elite power brokers in government and media cannot peddle the climate change lies fast enough but there is little real science behind what they claim.

They make movies and TV programs to cause fear that tell us how man caused climate change will cause huge catastrophes on the earth. This is all part of a lying propaganda campaign. They tell you how the latest storms are caused by global warming and that these events will increase in the future but they have no science behind their agenda of fear. How could the flood events in the Midwest be caused by global warming when the earth is cooler this year then it has been for almost a hundred years? The floods are really partly the result of an unusually cool Pacific this year. They should be sued for fraud.

You might wonder why the media is lying to you, you might wonder why Al Gore is lying to you, you might wonder why all globalist controlled politicians are lying to you. It is because the real agenda is getting control of and managing everyone on earth. Carbon legislation and the fear of global warming is the way they intend to bring in bureaucratic world governance over everyone.

Most have no idea how far they intend to take this scheme. Everything everyone does will be evaluated through carbon censor control freaks and you will comply or you will be fined or imprisoned. It will start with carbon and then it will spread to food, energy, religion and every other manageable area that they can dream up. This is nothing but a scheme to bring in Big Brother fascist world socialism. The earth is to become a giant global beehive with the elite being the queen bees. They are using irrational fears that they implanted in your brain through media lies and they are getting away with it. People have obviously lost their ability to reason or they would tar and feather these people.

The facts are that the earth has not warmed in a decade and it is now cooling. So they tell you the earth is talking a warming break but it will start warming again. Well, give me a break! Says who? Not any scientific consensus and IPCC and Al Gore do not speak for science they speak for global government. Meanwhile the politicians that you elected and that you are electing are planing to implement the biggest tax and control scheme in the history of the world!

Scientist: ‘Global warming’
scheme to push global tax

“The IPCC provides its reports at regular intervals and they immediately become standard works of reference, widely used by policymakers, experts and students,” the organization itself says. .

The IPCC conferences do, in fact, feature “a few hundred” people, including some with formal educations in science, some actively engaged in scientific work, some retired, holding discussions on “the entirely unsolved problem of climate prediction for time periods decades and even centuries in the future,” said Robinson, who also publishes the Access to Energy newsletter. In 1973, Robinson co-founded the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine with Linus Pauling.

“The primary requirement for selection is a willingness to participate in the United Nations’ new ‘process’ and the agenda behind it,” Robinson said. “These people study and discuss the current and past research literature concerning climate and climate prediction. … These emanations are closely observed by a very select small group of United Nations operatives.”

At the end of the meetings, “this small group of observers combines the products of the meeting into a large important-looking report – carefully editing the report so that it supports United Nations political objectives,” Robinson said. “At no time is this report submitted to the 600-plus ’scientists.’”

The results then are distributed as “settled science,” he said, “regardless of the fact that the scientists involved do not agree upon the text. … The elite few who oversaw the meeting and interpreted its results are special. They are the U.N.’s anointed messengers of the truth.”

“In the present case in which United Nations apparatchiks have proclaimed that human activity is catastrophically warming the planet, the human cost of error is so great than many other scientists have become motivated to individually examine the evidence. Now, a total of more than 9,000 Americans with Ph.D.s in science and therefore professional educational credentials that, on average, equal or surpass the United Nations 600 – and a total of more than 31,000 Americans with at least B.S. degrees in science have signed a petition to the U.S. government specifically rejecting the United Nations claim that human use of hydrocarbon energy is injuring the climate,” Robinson said.

“In fact, the 31,000 scientists state that carbon dioxide released by energy production is actually beneficial to the environment,” he said.

“It is time to kill this counterproductive virus that has sickened American science and engineering, and get on with the job of expanding the American hydrocarbon and nuclear energy industries. To do less poses a terrible risk to America’s prosperity and to her future,” he said.

The case is made that we could get all the oil we need out of coal and that we have more oil potential in coal than there is in the entire oil reserves in the world. Coal is already being made into oil in South Africa for about $55 a barrel. I would think that it would take a number of years to gear up in the U.S. and government and the radical environmentalists would have to get out of the way. Yet, coal is not all we have.

We also have oil shale reserves with more oil in them than the entire Middle-East reserves. Oil shale will be even easier and more enviornmentally friendly to get out of the ground than coal. It is much the same as drilling for oil except the necessary extra steps done below ground will still make oil profitable at $50 a barrel. So both oil production methods could produce all the oil we need for hundreds of years and give us gasoline for about $2 a gallon. I have not even talked about the oil sands of Canada that are just as huge.

So don’t let anyone tell you that we do not have the capability to get off of foreign energy dependency. That might be the party line but those who say such things are either ignorant, they are lying or they want crazy environmental restrictions. The only thing that is stopping development of all these resources is politicians. It is Congress and their government regulations.

If it were announced today that the U.S. would develop these resources on a unlimited scale oil futures and oil prices would drop like a rock half the price today is speculation. Also OPEC would panic and try to gear up production to lower prices below the price that we could develop these new resources in order to retrain their monopoly on oil. In that case, we would have to set a floor price and put a tariff on imported oil to keep it up to a price where these new resources could be developed and not undercut by Middle-East oil producers that extract their easy oil at less than $4 a barrel.

FrontPage Magazine

This in effect means that as long as the price of crude oil remains above $55 a barrel – and there is every reason to believe it will – America can enjoy fuel self-sufficiency for as long as the eye can see.

It is important to grasp the full import of this: Unlike all the other ideas and proposals for achieving oil independence, coal conversion represents no false hope or wishful thinking but an eminently feasible and realistic possibility.

No new inventions, no technological breakthroughs, no extensive infrastructure modifications, no lengthy testing, no public investment or government incentives are required to make it happen. Everything is already in place to bring it about

All that needs to be done is to remove any artificially imposed impediments that may stand in the way. Most of them are in the form of environmental rules and regulations which make energy production such a difficult and problematic enterprise in this country.

As far as the environment is concerned, coal conversion and its derivatives are cleaner than their crude oil counterparts. There is technology to capture the CO2 released during the liquefaction process and the resulting diesel and kerosene have lower sulfur content than those refined in the conventional way. As a result, during the combustion process they release fewer particulates and less nitrogen oxide then their petroleum cousins. Such, in fact, is their purity that they are often referred to as ultra-clean fuels. This should go a long way toward assuaging environmental concerns.

The rising energy prices have made it possible for America to commercially utilize its enormous coal reserves and to become fuel independent in the process. The only thing required at this point is for government not to interfere with market forces which inexorably incline toward this outcome.

Thracy a woman claiming to be a man with baby and all who promote this freak show richly deserve my Demented Delusional or Dumb Club of the week award. You can read about the demented and delusional details on the link below.

The ‘pregnant man’ freak show

she is a militant lesbian activist willing to use her body to undermine gender roles and promote sexual confusion. She is a propagandist of the first order. She plasters pictures of herself topless in her front yard, her self-butchered breasts over her pregnant belly, then claims victimization when receptionists look at her sideways. She appears on Oprah, then has the unremitting gall to claim that others are targeting her with cameras.

Thracy wrote in her dismally platitudinous, yet dramatically subversive piece in The Advocate, “Our situation ultimately will ask everyone to embrace the gamut of human possibility and to define for themselves what is normal.” The liberal, profit-driven press and the American court system have defined what’s normal – and Thracy is the new normal. Thracy, and those like her, are not victims of a repressive society – they are purveyors of a rootless society, seeking to impose a worldview that labels mental illness an exercise in liberation and destroys the traditional, child-centric family in favor of a loosely-organized group of beings (male, female or other) who see children as a right rather than a responsibility.

Thracy isn’t the first pregnant man – she is only the latest lesbian spokesperson for radical amorality, festooned with the plumage of masculinity. Testosterone doesn’t make a woman a man. And a bearded pregnant woman doesn’t make wrong right, no matter what the media say.

If America goes any further Left all those things Dennis Prager listed as future realities will be eagerly celebrated by the demented, delusional and dumb subjects of the fascist state that they created. If America did not want big government, and big brother socialism she would not be voting these people into power.

What it comes down to is that the people have been brainwashed in schools, media and through their own parent’s  lifestyle to deny God and to rely on socialism administrated by big government. The people of this nation now want and expect government to take care of them from birth to death. What they have not been taught and what has not been demonstrated to them is that they will eventually have to pay the bills for the spending spree.

Now they have no problem just creating new government social programs because they think someone else is picking up the tab. Well, no they ain’t and they haven’t been for a long time. The bill is all on their credit card and soon they will not even be able to pay the interest payment on the debt that is racked up. The impending one hundred trillion dollar price tag for the American social state that they wanted will bring them to poverty in this generation.

FrontPage Magazine

The day the O.J. Simpson verdict was announced, I said to my then-teenage son, “David, please forgive me. I am handing over to you a worse America than my father handed over to me.”

Unfortunately, I still feel this way.

One might argue that these are the same laments that every previous older generation has expressed — “Ah, when I was young…” But in America, that has not been the case. In America, the older generations tended to say the opposite — “When I was a kid, things were worse.”

Can we return to the America of my youth? No. Can we return to the best values of that time? Yes. But not if both houses of Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court move the country even further leftward. If that happens, many of the above noted changes will simply be accelerated: More laws restricting “offensive” speech will be enacted; litigation will increase and trial lawyers will gain more power; the American military will be less valued; trees will gradually replace the flag as our most venerated symbol; schools will teach even less as they concentrate even more on diversity, sexuality and the environment; teenage sex will be increasingly accepted; American identity will continue to be replaced by ethnic, racial, gender or “world citizen” identity; and the power of the state will expand further as the power of the individual inevitably contracts. It’s hard to believe most Americans really want that.

This is one great article about all the different aspects of global warming and it has the very latest information. This one article alone should make you question the sanity or honesty of many well known people promoting carbon legislation.

One demented preacher in the news today said that man caused global warming deniers are like child molesters. I want to reply to him that those who promote this carbon hoax on the world are murders! They are causing legislation and unnecessary burdens that will bring untold misery and death to many of the poor of the world. It will even cause famine and revolutions. But what do they care, many leading this facade think that poor people are useless eaters that the world would be better off without anyway.

If that is not enough carbon legislation will bring in world fascist where everything everyone does in the world will be controlled by carbon bean counters controlled by unelected elitist global governors.

FrontPage Magazine

The scientific consensus today is slowly beginning to shift away from the catastrophism of Gore, Suzuki and the United Nations IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, to suggest that the human contribution to global warming is far less than originally assumed and that a meteorological calamity is highly unlikely. (The IPCC, which certified and entrenched the so-called “scientific consensus,” is essentially a political body with an agenda of its own.) See Inhofe EPW Press Blog, Daily Tech online, and the journal Energy and Environment, whose findings are based on a survey of the ISI (Institute for Scientific Information) Web of Science database covering almost 9000 scientific publications.

Other reports conclude that “solar variability” is the major component in climate change and will run its course regardless of human intervention. As David Douglass writes in the International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society (December 2007), in a peer-reviewed article co-authored with several prominent scientists, “The observed pattern of warming . . . does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.”

The most sophisticated climate models indicate an undeniable discrepancy between surface and tropospheric temperature changes, which points to the sun as the primary agent in the long-term, fluctuating temperature curve. John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, patiently explains that the sun, which contains 99.8% of the mass of the solar system, in its hydrogen-fueled atomic fusion process, “consumes more mass in a second than all the fossil fuel ever burned on Earth,” the terrestrial impact of which reduces the human input to global warming to a level of insignificance. Though Coleman doesn’t cite actual figures, the fact is that the sun pours in excess of a million billion megawatt-hours annually on the earth. But he does quote the highly respected Australian mathematician and former carbon consultant for the Australian government, David Evans, who argues that “carbon emissions don’t cause global warming.” According to Evans, the IPCC models are wrong and the mathematics show that the human signature in the atmosphere is missing (KUSI News online, November 8, 2007).

Czech President Vaclav Klaus, author of the soon-to-be-translated Blue Planet in Green Chains, is on the mark when he warns of the irrationality of the bullish “global warming” industry: “As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism . . . Let us not scare ourselves with catastrophic forecasts, or use them to defend and promote irrational interventions in human lives”

NASA Administrator Michael D. Griffin, who has professed some skepticism about certain aspects of global warming research, especially with regard to theoretical computer models that tend, as he says, to run before they have learned to walk, was startled to realize that “you can’t express any sort of contrary opinion or a comment without it being treated almost as a religious issue” (Newsmax.com, March 17, 2008). The doxastic progression here is: science-politics-religion. To use Irving Kristol’s word, human beings are, whether we like it or not, “theotropic” beings.

Indeed, the metamorphosis of politics into a debased form of religion may be the bedrock definition of that otherwise debatable term, “fascism,” further specified as “ecofascism” by Janet Biehl and Peter Staudermaier in their book of that title.

I guess you can look at this a couple of ways. One way is that the party puts forth any candidate they want by any rules they dictate even if it means changing the rules in the middle of the game. So watch out who you allow to run the party. Why nut case Howard Dean is allowed to run the Democratic party is beyond me.

The other way of looking at it is that the primaries are really a national election and that each vote should count. In that case it did not happen in two heavily populated states with the democrats.

It is also true that the Media was working to promote one candidate over the others making the outcome much more favorable to their liking. If the deck is going to be stacked by the hard Left socialists in power positions we might as well be in Russia. Democracy in that case is nothing but a facade to make people think that they have control when all control really comes from the power elite’s ability to misinform the people and give out selective information to manipulate.

Now you know why all surviving candidates of the major parties for President are socialists in a middle right nation. And you know why the Media is lining up behind the most Far Left socialist of them all. So much for Democracy in America!

Dems take cue from the Soviets

How many times on Saturday did we hear the phrase that should make every free citizen shiver, “The true Will of the People.” “We know what the voters of Michigan or Florida intended to do, because we have the exit polls, or we have the MSNBC poll, or we have the anecdotal evidence.” Instead of simply counting votes, which is the only fair thing to do with votes in any election anywhere, the members of the Democratic Party Rules Committee deem it in their purview to decipher votes, interpret votes, translate votes – anything but count them! Then, to add fantasy to falsehood, they insisted on conjuring votes that were never even cast. After all, so goes their illogic, if voters didn’t show up who otherwise would have, its up to the committee members to discern how they would have voted if they did.

The fact that this committee of self-appointed commissars met at all with the intention to nullify or change election results is appalling enough. The additional fact that the media were silent in the face of this monstrosity is cause for grave concern.

Studying the tapes of Russert, “Meet the Press,” MSNBC, Chris Matthews, CNN and the political consultants at CNN, one will discover the frequent instances where these most interested partisans announced the primaries over, anointed Obama and called on Clinton to quit or repeatedly echoed the calls of those who did.

Then there are the proceedings of Saturday’s committee, replete with phrases, quotes and assertions that are nearly word for word identical to proceedings of the Soviet Central Committee, texts from meetings of the Comintern and speeches from Fidel Castro or the Sandinistas. Long live the dictatorship of the Proletariat!

If anyone has shown their true colors in this election season, it’s the left-wing radicals who control the Democratic Party and their partisan allies in the press.

Here is another view besides my own earlier comments about Interior’s decision to make Polar Bears an endangered species. Marc Sheppard makes it clear that it is going to allow the radicals to get the power that they want to ban everything they want to ban.

Meanwhile ABC showed another one sided propaganda piece on polar bears and seals in today’s news report. I am sure all the major media is following suit with the possible exception of Fox.

Science is not driving the agenda. It appears to be liberal idealism gone amok I do not know if these people actually believe this nonsense or if they just want to believe this nonsense. It is probably some of both. Of course the real power behind the movement is big money and elitist power brokers. In the elitist ideal world all 100,000 enlightened people allowed to live on their perfect planet besides themselves, would pretend that they are like God in their own animal kingdom. If the common people understood that they are just considered useless eaters or workers they would not be supporting their own slavery and demise.

American Thinker Blog: Protecting Not Polar Bears But Warmist Power

Kempthorne knows full well that the greenie groups that demanded the ESA listing are mostly the same that are pressuring the Environmental Protection Agency to declare CO2 a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. And that they have the lawsuits of 17 states and Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works chair Barbara Boxer behind their ridiculous demands.

Should they prevail, the EPA would, indeed, be in control of airborne carbon. And beyond inevitably materializing the green dream of cap-and-trade by regulatory decree, it would - in confluence with yesterday’s dreadful decision — empower unelected bureaucrats to levy huge ESA violation penalties against “polluters.”

And that’s just for starters.

Now consider this — taken but a miniscule regulatory step further, a family motoring about in an SUV in Texas could be cited not only for polluting under the Clean Air Act, but as their “pollution” has been regulated as a global warming contributor, they could be further fined under the Endangered Species Act for harming the protected polar bear.

Did I mention that penalties for such ESA transgressions can be a maximum fine of up to $50,000 or imprisonment for one year, or both — per violation?

Such - not solar or wind — represents the true power sought by warmists.

John McCain if elected will be a disaster for this nation. Obama if elected will be a disaster for this nation. That is the choice you have. McCain’s thinking is totally disjointed. Perhaps he lost his mind while in Nam because he simply proves to not be a rational being. McCain latest insanity is that is going to speak at the national convention of LA Raza.

McCain and the La Raza card

The news this week that John McCain will attend the national convention of La Raza is beyond disturbing.

It is sickening. It is repulsive. It is inexcusable. It is … immoral and evil.

Why do I say this?

Because I know what La Raza is all about.

The National Council of La Raza bills itself as a “civil rights” organization. It would be more appropriate to say it disguises itself as such. It camouflages itself as such. It hides its real purpose and true intents as such – with the willing and skillful assistance of many of my media colleagues.

In reality, La Raza is a racist hate group – a band of “Hispanic supremacists,” if you will, though it is seldom characterized that way.

And by his action in playing the La Raza card (or race card), John McCain has spoken volumes about where he will take this country as president – and it is nowhere that I want to see it go.

We need more people like Lord Christopher Monckton and James Inhofe? The global warming swindle is so obvious once you hear the facts. These gentlemen are of the few in politics doing anything about getting those facts out.

As soon as the carbon control freaks use disinformation to pass costs or taxes unto the population they should be sued. If Al Gore’s propaganda film is required viewing in schools or anywhere else those requiring it should be sued. The evidence is clear that they have no proof that man is causing global warming and it will stand up in court. In contrast, Gore’s Inconvenient truth film already got shot down in court as a pack of lies.

Al Gore will not debate anyone. He knows the information he presents is Junk Science. Lets face it, certain people are in this for power and money or they just insist on having blind environmental religious faith that man has to be harming the planet. Most other people of the world have been brainwashed by the media these people control. If the people of the world ever grasped the truth about how world power brokers are going to use this to fleece and control them they would be furious.

President Bush Betrays His Friend, The Facts, and Free Enterprise, - CWN

Blankley rightly concludes, “The liberal world order will not let go of their global warming assault on free economics until hell freezes over—by which point, obviously, the global warming theory will be visibly disproven.”

President Bush needs to invite Lord Christopher Monckton to the White House for a chat. Glenn Beck interviewed Lord Monckton (a former Margaret Thatcher policy advisor from 1982-1986 and a graduate of Churchill College, Cambridge) on March 4, 2008, and allowed him to state the following: “What happened is that I looked at Al Gore’s movie with mounting horror and identified three dozen scientific errors in it. So I had a weather mate of mine who takes an interest in these matters and also had the money to pay for a court case and I said I thought this film was rubbish. Two weeks later he rang up and said he wanted to do something to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense, which is what global warming is really all about.”

To make a long story short Lord Monckton took the case to court because Al Gore’s unscientific movie was being required in all British public schools. Monckton won his court case. The court decreed that if Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth is shown, then “The Great Global Swindle” must also be shown.

Not a timid soul, Lord Monckton is also going after NASA’s James Hansen for being in bed with Al Gore both “politically and financially.” Both stand to cash in on their alarmist gospel (someone called it “garbage in and gospel out”), and the present-day Braveheart has written to the administrator of NASA, asking for a full investigation. If he gets the brush-off, he plans to appeal to the Office of the U.S. Attorney General!

Al Gore might think “the debate in the scientific community is over,” but he hasn’t seen anyone like Lord Monckton on this side of the Atlantic. Lord Monckton is presently placing catchy ads in American newspapers, asking Gore to debate him in public. As of this writing, Gore hasn’t responded. If and when he does, he needs to have W in his corner with a towel and a bucket of water. Senator James M. Inhofe will be in Lord Monckton’s corner with crumpets and tea. Stay tuned—this could be a rematch of a Joe Louis—Max Schmeling fight.

Dave says enemies of truth substituted lies throughout our society. Now that is the truth.

Dave Daubenmire — The Separation of Truth and State

he separation between the TRUTH AND THE STATE is what they were after. It wasn’t religion they had to remove. It was the Truth that stood in the way.

“Truth has fallen in the streets.” They told us truth was relative, and that ethics were “situational.” They chided our children, “don’t judge,” and chastised those who did. They removed from the school house wall the scales by which all morality was weighed and soon everyone was doing “what was right in their own eyes.”

“If it feels good do it. Tune-in, turn-on, drop-out. Go for the gusto. You only pass this way once. Live and let live. Go for it. You deserve it. Did God really say that? Everyone lies about sex…”

We are a nation of liars. We expect lying from our leaders. They don’t even blush.

We hire teachers to teach us lies and elected politicians to tell us lies. We pay them to teach lies, tell lies, so we can believe lies. Lies make us feel better.

How else can you explain what is being taught to our children in our schools with our permission and dollars?

But it didn’t start there. It started in the ivory towers of academia first. Communism, masquerading as liberalism, snuck into positions of authority. Communism is a God-less system of government where absolute Truth does not exist. Right and wrong was no longer defined by the God of the Bible, but by public opinion, or worse yet, the university-trained terrorists in black robes.

Time’s cover is not only disrespectful and disgraceful their global warming alarmism is absolutely insane. As evidence mounts that global warming is not the threat that some believed it to be, these loons go on a green warpath to alarmism. I guess they need to sell fear to get some green.

Iwo Jima Veterans Blast Time’s ‘Special Environmental Issue’ Cover

Time
editor tells MSNBC ‘there needs to be a real effort along the lines of
World War II to combat global warming and climate change.’

For only the second time in 85 years, Time magazine abandoned the traditional red border it uses on its cover. The occasion – to push more global warming alarmism.

The cover of the April 21 issue of Time took the famous Iwo Jima photograph by Joe Rosenthal of the Marines raising the American flag and replaced the flag with a tree. The cover story by Bryan Walsh calls green “the new red, white and blue.”

Donald Mates, an Iwo Jima veteran, told the Business & Media Institute on April 17 that using that photograph for that cause was a “disgrace.”

People are about to reap what they let the eco-nitwits start. The question that will be asked too late is why did most of the world support the nitwits junk science solutions to fix a non existent global warming problem? If people continue to allow themselves to be brainwashed and managed by these silly nitwit eco-loons, elitists and control freaks they will reap very negative consequences.

People need to teach themselves how to think for themselves and not just parrot and agree with everything they hear from the nitwits in the elitist controlled media.

FOXNews.com - Junk Science: A New ‘Green’ Body Count Begins - Opinion

Food riots caused by rising food prices have erupted around the world. Five people died in uprisings in Haiti, perhaps the first of many casualties to come from the fad of being “green.”

Food riots also broke out in Egypt, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Senegal and Ethiopia. The military is being deployed in Pakistan and Thailand to protect fields and warehouses. Higher energy costs and policies promoting the use of biofuels such as ethanol are being blamed.

“When millions of people are going hungry, it’s a crime against humanity that food should be diverted to biofuels,” an Indian government official told the Wall Street Journal. Turkey’s finance minister labeled the use of biofuels as “appalling,” according to the paper.

Biofuels have turned out to be a lose-lose-lose proposition. Once touted by the greens and the biofuel industry as being able to reduce the demand for oil and lower greenhouse gas emissions, biofuels have accomplished neither goal and have no prospect for accomplishing either in the foreseeable future.

The world has an ever-growing population that needs more and more energy, but the greens are doing everything they can to constrict the world’s energy supply.

As the Sierra Club campaigns to shut down our coal-fired electricity capabilities, the Natural Resources Defense Council campaigns to prevent nuclear power from taking its place. The demise of coal-fired power and the blockage of increased nuclear power will increase the demand for supply constraints on, and the prices for, natural gas.

But then again, environmental advocacy group Earth First perhaps is helping to alleviate the looming natural gas crisis by campaigning against power plants that use the fuel. In a recent campaign against a South Florida power plant, an Earth First campaigner stated that the environment ought not be threatened “so that people can fuel their greedy energy desires.” “Just say ‘no’ to electricity,” seems to be the bottom line of eco-think.

Many in this nation are stuck on stupid and this Demented Delusional and Dumb Club Blog helps document that fact. You say we as a nation must remind ourselves what truth and lies look like, victim and criminal, good and evil, etc.

Those not dumbed down have been attempting to educated the stupid people in this nation to do that for a long time and you see where it is getting us.

I think you are preaching to the choir. How do you get a nation stuck on stupid to change when stupidly is the hallmark of the “education” system, lies are presented as truth by media and a stupid watered down gospel is preached from the pulpits?

Perhaps it is time for the astute to start a new nation. I no longer think the brainwashed people are teachable.

Laurie Roth — Stuck on Stupid Syndrome is Growing

We must as a nation remind ourselves what truth and lies look like, what evil and good looks like and what victim and criminal looks like! Empathy and “rights” are nice when offered first and foremost to our people, our military and our citizens. There is a point where “stuck on stupid” syndrome doesn’t cut it anymore. We MUST take back our courts and demand common sense Judges. We MUST take back congress and demand they get clear about good and evil and right and wrong. We must not allow persecution against parents and home schoolers, border patrol doing their jobs, military being brave in service, those trying to protect our children from predators and those fighting fearlessly against Islamic Radicals. We can save our country people. It is up to us.

They have no scientific facts to support the Left driven Co2 warming hysteria. They will not accept scientific facts when it is presented to them. So perhaps the next step is to exposed the real reasons for this fraud on the world. When the truth is exposed these blackbirds will be put in cages. Then all the pigeons following them will fly away looking for new refuse piles to scavenge.

American Thinker: The slick trick behind global frauding

In Stalin’s Russia any dissenter from the Party Line was guilty. Innocence had to be proved. It’s a standard tyrant’s trick. During the reign of Oliver Cromwell in England, witchhunters did not have to prove that their victims were guilty. The accused witches had to prove their innocence.

That’s what Al Gore has done to science: He and his friends have flipped innocence and guilt from normal science to Stalinist science.

In Al Gore’s America, any “global warming denier” is guilty until proven innocent. He or she must have been bought off by Big Oil. Skeptics, no matter how well-qualified, must prove the negative about really silly alarmist hogwash. And whenever some prediction is falsified, the warm mongers have an explanation: it’s just a temporary glitch in the data. Oh, yes, we were wrong about 1998, but just wait till 2050! The excuses are endless.

There are no facts robust enough, consistent enough, and verified enough to support the mass hysteria. The climate system is hypercomplex, nonlinear and poorly understood. The media spinners are immensely ignorant about real science, and just care about the next scare headline. There’s a lot of wild speculation and a mob of self-serving politicians, bureaucrats and media types who stand to gain a ton of power and money by suckering millions of taxpayers. Al Gore just started a 300 million dollar PR campaign to convince everybody. When was the last time you saw 300 million bucks being spent to promote a scientific hypothesis that was already proven? We’re not spending millions to prove the existence of gravity. The uproar and money involved in this fraud is in direct proportion to the lack of solid facts.

The last ten years have seen global cooling, not warming.

One reason the message cannot get out that increasing Co2 is not causing more global warming are these self appointed news censors. People should contact BBC to let them know what they think about this slanted reporting of the news.

BBC Caught Editing Story To Appease Global Warming Lobbyist

“It would be better if you did not quote the sceptics,” she writes, “Their voice is heard everywhere, on every channel. They are deliberately obstructing the emergence of the truth.”

Abbess threatens the writer again that he will be the target of a campaign on behalf of the environmentalists, stating, “You may appear in an unfavourable light because it could be said that you have had your head turned by the sceptics.”

When I first heard about the media reporting about the breaking off the Antarctic ice I said to myself they are ignoring the real facts but I figured I would wait until someone published the facts. You will find the real facts about the Antarctic ice pack right here in this article.

All you heard from the media was that a huge iceberg broke off and it was suggested to be further proof of rapid global warming but what they have not told you is that the Antarctic ice pack has been rapidly growing and was at record levels in 2007. Also temperatures have been dropping on the bulk of the continent for 35 years.

It would be nice to get some balanced reporting from the media for a change but that will not happen as long as people with hidden agendas control the news networks.

This is a good article to catch up on the truth on what is happening in the Antarctic and in the science that is debunking man-caused global warming myth.

.: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.

Yet, if only the media would spend a moment to get beyond the hype and alarmism, they would discover that scientists are already thoroughly debunking the media characterization of the “melting” Antarctic. [Note: 2007 and now 2008 are overwhelmingly turning into the “tipping points” for climate alarmism as new peer-reviewed studies continue to debunk rising CO2 fears, a U.S. Senate minority report reveals over 400 scientists dissented from man-made climate fears, and more and more scientists continue in 2008 to declare themselves skeptical of a man-made climate “crisis.”The Earth’s failure to continue warming has also confounded promoters of man-made climate fear.

Here is a sampling of inconvenient developments for climate alarmists in 2008 alone: 1) Oceans Cooling! Scientists puzzled by “mystery of global warming’s missing heat”- LINK 2) New Data from NASA’s Aqua satellite is showing “greatly reduced future warming projected as a consequence of carbon dioxide.”- LINK 3) Former NASA Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer found not one peer-reviewed paper has ‘ruled out a natural cause for most of our recent warmth’ – LINK 4) UN IPCC in ‘Panic Mode’ as Earth Fails to Warm, Scientist says – LINK 5) UN IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri “to look into the apparent temperature plateau so far this century.”- LINK 6) New scientific analysis shows Sun “could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth’s average temperature” – LINK & LINK. 7) An International team of scientists released a March 2008 report to counter UN IPCC, declaring: “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” – LINK MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen’s new analysis finds the Earth has had “No statistically significant warming since 1995.”

It is really scary to think that such a bozo like Al Gore could be the next leader of the free world should the democrats deadlock.

There is quite a difference between those who do not believe in Al Gore’s man caused global warming alarmism and the flat earth society. The only science Al Gore has is based on his own blind faith in junk science theories, most of which have already been debunked, some in a court of law.

Growing numbers of skeptics have debunked Al Gore’s cult like followers with scientific measurable facts. So Al Gore might say that those who do not believe his “enlightened” man-caused global warming message do not share his blind faith.

I must say Al Gore is consistently consistent. He never debates the evidence, he just marginalizes all who disagree with him and calls them names. That is a consistent trait of all cult leaders and tyrants.

I can tell people about Jesus but there are those who choose to retain blind faith in Gaia. Just because the majority on earth choose to be pagans does not make paganism true. Neither is Al Gore’s faith based global warming
religion true.

Gore’s Message To Climate Change Skeptics, Tells 60 Minutes That Doubting Global Warming Is Man-Made Is Akin To Believing Earth Is Flat - CBS News

(CBS) Self-avowed “P.R. agent for the planet” Al Gore says those who still doubt that global warming is caused by man - among them, Vice President Dick Cheney - are acting like the fringe groups who think the 1969 moon landing never really happened, or who once believed the world is flat

In my opinion Dr. Singer should sue Harris and ABC News for slander against him and there should be a class action lawsuit against Al Gore for deliberate fraud.

They have no argument against the presented scientific facts against carbon driven global warming and they will not even debate the science. So they resort to throwing mud balls at distinguish scientists that question their junk science claims.

Here a global warming hysteric quotes an unknown pipsqueak to slander a world class atmospheric physicist.

Tell me that this is objective news reporting and that power brokers with their own globalist agenda are not really pulling the strings?

FOXNews.com - Junk Science: Global Smearing - Opinion

By any standard, atmospheric physicist Dr. S. Fred Singer is a remarkably accomplished scientist. But his outspoken questioning of global warming alarmism has just earned him one of the most outrageous mainstream media smear pieces I’ve ever seen.ABC News reporter Dan Harris interviewed Singer for more than an hour at the recent International Climate Conference. From that interview, Harris produced a three-minute TV broadcast and Web site article that was about as fair and objective toward Singer as I might expect Greenpeace to be.

In fact, considering the activist group’s dominant role in Harris’ “report,” it seems that ABC News was merely the production company for a Greenpeace propaganda hit.

We have a media that is totally controlled by elitist world power brokers. It is worse than a state controlled media because they report what they want you to believe and with their total control of the media they have the means to brainwash the whole world.

They are using global warming hype as one of their main tools to bring in their Marxist agenda of global governance by the elite. If it were not climate it would be something else.

Anything that does not fit their socialist agenda is not going to be published, so if junk science climate change is going to be refuted, it now has to come from a source outside of their control. Perhaps the courts?

FOXNews.com - Junk Science: The Washington Post-er Child for Climate Bias - Opinion

Eilperin’s March 10 article entitled “Carbon Output Must Near Zero to Avert Danger, New Studies Say” has the same sort of journalistic objectivity one might expect from totalitarian state-controlled media.

I hope WND learned its lesson form all this and will more closely check out its sources in the future. You cannot just publish alleged criminal activity just because some unnamed source claims it, unless you are willing to give the the source of the accusations or have documented proof of the criminal activity. The standard should even be higher for a Christian publisher.I have seen many stories on Internet sites that just publish whatever they want against people as if it were true without any supporting facts offered.

I cannot imagine the cost to WND in fighting and settling this case. At least you still have a business after all this. I think that was in doubt until this settlement. I hope others on the Internet will learn from this.

clipped from www.worldnetdaily.com “Discovery has revealed to WorldNetDaily.com that no witness verifies the truth of what the witnesses are reported by authors to have stated. Additionally, no document has been discovered that provides any verification that the statements written were true. “Factual discovery in the litigation and response from Freedom of Information Act requests to law enforcement agencies confirm Clark Jones’ assertion that his name has never been on law enforcement computers, that he has not been the subject of any criminal investigation nor has he interfered with any investigation as stated in the articles. Discovery has also revealed that the sources named in the publications have stated under oath that statements attributed to them in the articles were either not made by them, were misquoted by the authors, were misconstrued, or the statements were taken out of context.

You will know soon enough that what it quoted below is true. Homosexual sex practices spread disease. Every honest person in the health profession knows that this is true. Yet, the Homosexuals keep acting like there filthy practices are not a threat to themselves or anyone else. The dead and sickly of their diseases now know otherwise and the next deadly chapter is now about to be played out. Meanwhile expect a cover up and a twisting of the truth.

clipped from www.christianworldviewnetwork.com Although outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, have primarily been confined to hospitals in the past, the study determined that, due to “high risk behaviors” beyond hospital walls — such as “anal sex” — men who have sex with men are now 13 times more likely to contract the infection.  Because this particular strain can be transmitted through “skin-to-skin contact,” researchers fear the outbreak “has the potential for rapid, nationwide dissemination” and will spread to “the general population.”  Once it does, they say it will be “unstoppable.”

‘Why Is There No Honest Discourse About Terrorism’s Roots?’ - Frank Salvato - Dec 14, 07: “The fact of the matter is this: The politically correct mainstream media; agenda-driven, sensationalistic, emotionally opportunistic, one-sided and uneducated, has assumed, nay commandeered, the role of arbiter of what is right and what is wrong. They have crowned themselves “deciders” of what is appropriate for our consumption and what is not. They have come to dictate, in totalitarian fashion, the parameters of any public conversation with regard to the most important issue of the day, the survival of our nation.

Proof of this can be found in the absence of any pictures or footage of the 9/11 attacks on news broadcasts. It can be found in their grotesque and politically correct reluctance to even speak the words “Islam” and “terrorism” in the same sentence. It can be found in their refusal to acknowledge that almost 100% of the legitimately defined terrorist acts are perpetrated at the hands of Wahhabist terrorists – Islamist radicals, Islamist fundamentalists – dedicated to the demise of Western Civilization and the establishment of a global Caliphate.”