This is a very long article but if you want to know what kind of change that Hillary and Obama are planning to bring to America this article will clarify that.

FrontPage Magazine

iven the huge intellectual debt that both Democrat presidential candidates owe to Saul Alinsky, it is vital for all American voters to understand precisely who he was and what he taught. As you read this, you will hear in his words the echo of many familiar, outspoken leftist agitators for “change.”

Though Alinsky is generally viewed as a member of the political Left, and rightfully so, his legacy is more methodological than ideological. He identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power.

Though Alinsky died in 1972, his legacy has lived on as a staple of leftist method, a veritable blueprint for revolution — to which both Democratic presidential candidates, who are his disciples and protégés, refer euphemistically as “change.”

The high cost of energy can be solved by lifting government restrictions and giving incentives for oil companies to drill and refine. All the energy we need can be found at less than half the energy equivalent of the cost of a barrel of oil today. Free enterprise will remedy shortages and price spikes but when free enterprise is stymied by government economic and energy disasters like we see today are certain. Affordable energy is not a pipe dream unless we continue to let a minority with bazaar views strangle everyone else.

An Alaskan pipe dream?

My “Black Gold Stranglehold” co-author, Jerome Corsi, and I have been begging our leaders to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, or ANWR, which could be producing an additional million barrels of oil per day which, when refined, equals 27 million gallons of gasoline or diesel. Think of the impact that would have on current market conditions. And while it should have been done years ago, it is not too late.

Nothing would send a stronger signal to the energy markets that America is serious about exploration of future reserves than if we initiated a “Manhattan project”-style effort in obtaining domestic sources of oil. For far too long our country has been held in the grip of radical environmentalists who have been unable to grasp the idea that modern technological advances allow us to safely harvest oil in the most extreme locations.

Congress, especially a Democratically controlled Congress, tends to believe every solution is found in higher taxes. Those in Democratic leadership, including Hillary Clinton, are renewing their call for a “windfall profits tax” on big oil. Nothing will do more harm than higher taxes or government regulation on the current market conditions. If government wants to help than they should fast track legislation to open up our domestic sources of oil … now!

This will allow the breathing room necessary to pursue all other alternatives such as wind, solar, nuclear, bio-mass, ethanol, etc. And as technology increases and economies of scale kick in, prices will become competitive and in time supplement oil, coal and natural gas. We believe the future for reducing usage of traditional hydrocarbon sources of energy is very promising. But for now, let’s use what we have in abundance to meet the needs of millions of Americans.

Government will keep trying to fix the problems they created until they end up killing us all.

The windfall profiteers

the story that really delves into the devious mind of the politician, and reveals why politicians will never be interested in “saving” any money, came courtesy of New York Rep. Charles Rangel.

Get this – Rangel actually told a reporter, with a spin worthy of the top criminal defense lawyers in the land, that he spends $777 of taxpayer money a month for his Cadillac DeVille because driving a cheaper car would be a sign of disrespect to his constituents. Wow. That takes cojones the size of … well, Charles Rangel’s cojones.

These are the kind of people who are charged with “fixing” all our problems, including high gas prices and how to stimulate the economy.

Democrats represent the majority of Americans so what does that say about national sanity? It is obvious to me that the leadership of neither party have sane answers on many issues but who elects them?

The Democrats are insane

The popular definition of insanity is making the same mistake over and over again expecting a different result.

By this definition, the Democratic Party leadership is insane.

Three examples:

High gas prices: The Democrats’ answer? A back-to-the-glorious-70s Jimmy Carter freeze in the dark replay with a global warming twist.

Health insurance availability and cost: The Democrats’ answer? A back-to-the-90s Hillary Clinton government seizure of the whole health care system.

War in Iraq: The Democrats’ plan? Declare defeat on the brink of success to relive the glory days of Vietnam.

Read on and weep for the great Democratic Party

This is a good article. He makes the case that liberal presidents (or vice Presidents) continually try to redeem themselves and in doing so continually show us their flaws.

American Thinker: The Democrats’ Ex-Presidents

Why is it that so many Democratic leaders find it necessary to continue making spectacles of themselves after they leave office?

It’s an exclusively Democratic trait — you don’t find Republicans acting this way.

the liberal pol demands another turn at the plate, another opportunity to prove himself, to demonstrate to the world that he was right all along. And since he’s not alone on stage, since he’s competing with somebody else who actually is president at the moment (and may in fact be accomplishing things), he picks the most outlandish, fantastic, comic-book tasks imaginable. Tasks beyond the reach of any single human individual, perhaps any nation. Carter wants to be the universal peacemaker and guarantor of democracy. Gore would like to save the planet. And Bill… in attempting to convince the nation that Hillary is presidential material, he has the most thankless task of all.

Grown men, trying to convince the world that they’re supermen - it’s sad, and pointless, and more than a little ridiculous.

We’ll be seeing more of it. Having accomplished little or nothing, liberal presidents are going to be left unsatisfied and restless, and will hit the streets in an effort to do something about it. In extreme cases, like that of Jimmy Carter, they are going to blame everyone else in the world but themselves, and make the world pay for it.

Henry Lamb talks here about a Federal water bill that will transform America to socialism. I agree, but I have news. There will be scores of bills passed in the next administration that will transform America to total socialism. If American’s willingly vote in socialists to government what other system of government should we expect to have? It is not Congress that is transforming America to socialism. It is the incredibly naive or amoral dumbed down brainwashed American people that are voting in the Obama’s Clinton’s McCain’s Pelosi’s and Reid’s.

Congress to transform America to socialism?

The classic definition of socialism is: government control of the sources of production. A bill now before Congress, H.R. 2421, will give the federal government absolute control over all sources of production. This bill, if enacted, will instantly convert the United States into a socialist nation.

The debate, however, is not about the merits of socialism over capitalism and free markets; the debate is about water. The bill will give to the federal government control over all water in the United States, and control over all “… activities affecting these waters.”

Dave says enemies of truth substituted lies throughout our society. Now that is the truth.

Dave Daubenmire — The Separation of Truth and State

he separation between the TRUTH AND THE STATE is what they were after. It wasn’t religion they had to remove. It was the Truth that stood in the way.

“Truth has fallen in the streets.” They told us truth was relative, and that ethics were “situational.” They chided our children, “don’t judge,” and chastised those who did. They removed from the school house wall the scales by which all morality was weighed and soon everyone was doing “what was right in their own eyes.”

“If it feels good do it. Tune-in, turn-on, drop-out. Go for the gusto. You only pass this way once. Live and let live. Go for it. You deserve it. Did God really say that? Everyone lies about sex…”

We are a nation of liars. We expect lying from our leaders. They don’t even blush.

We hire teachers to teach us lies and elected politicians to tell us lies. We pay them to teach lies, tell lies, so we can believe lies. Lies make us feel better.

How else can you explain what is being taught to our children in our schools with our permission and dollars?

But it didn’t start there. It started in the ivory towers of academia first. Communism, masquerading as liberalism, snuck into positions of authority. Communism is a God-less system of government where absolute Truth does not exist. Right and wrong was no longer defined by the God of the Bible, but by public opinion, or worse yet, the university-trained terrorists in black robes.

Chuck Baldwin views are too radical to even win an election to become pastor of most Baptist churches. I respect some of his views but America will not support him. You would think that a national party that exists to bring back government to the intent of its founders could come up with a more qualified and more well known candidate. I think this party will soon be over. Baldwin will have zero impact on this election and he will not start a third party grass roots movement for the future either.

Constitution Party stunner: Chuck Baldwin KOs firebrand Alan Keyes | KansasCity.com Prime Buzz

Convening its national convention in Kansas City today, the Constitution Party picked radio talk-show host Chuck Baldwin over former Ambassador Alan Keyes as its 2008 presidential candidate.

The pick was seen as something of an upset, given Keyes’ higher national profile. Known for his fiery stem-winders, Keyes is a two-time GOP presidential candidate who abandoned the Republican Party this month to join the Constitution Party, which believes in limited government and is committed to ending abortion and bringing American troops home from Iraq.

But Baldwin’s roots in the Constitution Party run deeper. He was the party’s 2004 vice-presidential candidate, and party members said his stands were more in line with party thinking.

Obama is an ultra liberal elitist idealist and univeralist who believes that all problems can be solved if he is in charge. Like many products of our modern educational system truth is what he wants it to be and says it is. Like New Spiritually (New Age) believers He lives in positive thinking Yeswecanland and cannot be bothered with reality.

Obama claims to have all the social solutions but the numbers do not add up. There simply is no way to pay for all his social programs. It will not only fail it will bring the nation to economic ruin. There is no way his foreign policy will work either. If he thinks he can deal with evil tyrants and terrorists by tossing sweet carrots to them he will openly be made a fool like Jimmy Carter and then he will probably overreact with his stick and start a war.

Obama obviously cannot take criticisms. Can you imagine the reaction of Obama if the press and the people of this country turn against him and mock him like they have done to George Bush. At least McCain knows he has a problem in this area and he might become aware of any overreaction before he does something foolish. Obama’s reaction toward America or another nation may be more like his pastor. Beware of Oprahitis Obamutopia and Yeswecanland these are Liberal islands of delusion.

Beware Obamutopia

Obama’s recurring theme rears its naive head again: We can all get along – even terrorists – if we remove the arbitrary barriers against believing in man’s perfectibility and that even terrorists and tyrants aren’t evil.

Obama’s health care proposals are similarly fantastic. He would provide every American with coverage that’s at least equal to that of members of Congress. With his executive wand, he would reduce everyone’s premiums by $2,500 a year and outlaw exclusions for pre-existing conditions. Dr. Barack would also mandate that the health care industry focus more on prevention and primary care. But wait, there’s more: He’ll accomplish all this by the end of his first term.

This is just a sampling. But what’s scarier than Obama’s far-fetched promises is that people – in droves – believe them. We must hope others are paying closer attention.

Al Gore’s accused people like the following of being in the flat earth society because they do not believe in his man caused Co2 driven global warming theories. Al Gore is a politician with a political agenda. These men are top scientists so who do you think is really telling the truth?

FrontPage Magazine

In Lawrence Solomon’s new book — The Deniers: The World-Renowned Scientists Who Stood up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud — and Those Who Are Too Fearful to Do So — the environmental columnist for Canada’s National Post lists a few of the “kooks” who haven’t attained Al Gore’s exalted level of scientific knowledge:

Dr. Antonino Zichichi,
a former president of the European Physical Society who discovered
nuclear antimatter and is one of the world’s foremost physicists. He
calls global warming projection models “incoherent and invalid.”

Dr. Christopher Landsea, the past
chairman of the American Meteorological Society’s Committee on Tropical
Meteorology and Tropical Cyclones. Says he: “There are no known
scientific studies that show a conclusive physical link between global
warming and observed hurricane frequency and intensity.”

Prof. Freeman Dyson, one of the world’s most eminent physicists. He asserts the models used to justify global warming alarmism are “full of fudge factors” and “do not begin to describe the real world that we live in.”

Prof. Paul Reiter, chief
of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the famed Pasteur Institute. He
notes, “no major scientist with any long record in this field” accepts
Gore’s claim that global warming spreads mosquito-borne diseases.

Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, a
world-renowned expert on the ancient ice cores used in historical
climate research. He says the U.N. “based its global-warming hypothesis
on arbitrary assumptions and these assumptions, it is now clear, are
false.”

Here is another view on Jimmy Carter our traitorous ex-president.

Carter to Hamas’ rescue

You might think a former president best known for pulling the Persian rug out from under the shah of Iran and rolling out the red carpet for the takeover of that country by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini might be more circumspect about embracing anti-Jewish, anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Western Middle East terrorists 30 years later.

But that kind of expectation would only be appropriate if Jimmy Carter were a lucid, rational, moral agent. He has proven once again he is not.

Carter, instead, like so many of his fellow Democratic Party leaders, only seems comfortable when he is undercutting his own country’s national security, demeaning America’s role in the world and, particularly, blaming the Jewish state for all of the problems in the Middle East.

It’s an amazing and mortifying spectacle to behold.

In another era, a former president who acted so recklessly might face treason charges when he returned. Indeed, he should. But, of course, he won’t. His treacherous actions won’t be punished at all – paving the way for more outrageous behavior in the future by him, other ex-presidents and other private citizens who have no business meddling in America’s foreign affairs.

At some point, we have to recognize the obvious: Jimmy Carter hates Israel, he hates America and he is still pursuing some kind of payoff from the oil powers of the Middle East for doing their dirty work for them.

At what point in his life did Jimmy Carter sell out to the Devil? Every wonder why Billy Carter drank himself to death. He knew his brother.

Jimmy Carter: Emissary of evil

Jimmy Carter is all about Jimmy Carter. During his presidency, he gave up the Panama Canal and allowed the Ayatollahs to take power in Iran – all for the praise of the international community. In 1980, he asked the Soviet Union to release Jewish emigrants, hoping that such action would soften American feeling against the USSR and thereby swing the presidential election to him. In 1984, he told the Russians that if Reagan were re-elected, there would not “be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan remained in power.” In 2002, Carter accepted the Nobel Peace Prize, despite a clear indication by Nobel Committee members that the prize was meant as a rebuke to President Bush.

Does all this make Carter evil, or just a useful idiot? By all accounts, Carter is highly intelligent – perhaps the most intelligent president of the last 50 years. It would be foolish to write him off as simply naive. He is quite willing to be used by dictators from Venezuela to Cuba to North Korea, so long as helping them polishes his legacy. For almost three decades, Carter has pandered to enemies of Western Civilization, shielding his treasonous behavior with the title of “ex-president.” His Hamas-hugging is just the latest entry in a political diary that would make Osama bin Laden proud.

I thought you might want to know how some people are taking about Obama’s arrogant statement about rural Pennsylvanians. Heck if he now gets blown out in Pennsylvania it will probably just reinforce his views that they are all pin headed bigoted hicks.

Stix Nix Obama’s Trix - HUMAN EVENTS

Barack Obama broke the first rule of Democratic presidential politics: never let on that you believe rural American voters are hicks straight out of Deliverance. Unfortunately for The Chosen One’s adoring fans, he could not have picked a worse time to reveal his contempt for average Americans.

Obama has a very distorted view of people in rural America. Yes Americans in these areas are bitter that globalists in government sold them out and helped move all the good paying manufacturing jobs overseas. But they do not cling to guns for that reason. They believe guns are their second amendment right for protection from all kinds of animals on two legs, some in government. They know the history of government recently displayed in fascism/socialism that first came for the people’s guns and then established tyranny over the people. That is exactly what socialists like Obama intend to do with their gun laws, their expansion of government control over the people and their hate speech laws.

People in small towns cling to religion because they still believe in God unlike you socialist secular humanists and pagans.

They have antipathy toward illegal immigrants coming in and taking the few jobs left, having to pay for their social welfare for darn good reason. Not to mention the drugs illegals bring in. They have antipathy about the government trade agreements for more obvious good reasons.

Obama obviously thinks that rural small town America are bitter hateful racists and he thinks that way because he is a racist himself. He proves that by going to a black racist hate church and by the way he talks about whites.

Like I said before, this man will divide America not unite it. Why would any rural Bible believing person vote for a socialist who promises to take away their guns and take away their religious free speech? If Americans make him President they might as well have lost the Cold War to the Soviet Union and changed their name to Amerika.

I think what Obama said about small-town America is despicable. Democratic delegates should switch. Prior cocaine use, black racism and this anti-American talk should be one straw too many even for Democrats. Because of his statement below Obama hands down wins my Demented Delusional or Dumb Club of the week award.

Obama Draws Fire for Comments on Small-Town America - America’s Election HQ

“Our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives,” he said. “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.

“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Here you have it from the horses own mouth. Obama will support repealing the Defense of Marriage Act, open homosexuality in the military and hate speech laws.

That means everyone will have to recognize homosexual marriage and government and businesses will have to give benefits to help support their perverted lifestyle and will not even be allowed to complain about it. Americans will have to hire homosexuals for even religious positions and keep their mouth shut about biblical morality. You certainly will not be allowed to tell the pagans that Jesus is the only way to salvation.

If this man is the leading contender for President what does it say about America? If he gets elected, America will actually divide, not unite.

I can just see it now…. Gay pride military parades on Veterans day and when anyone protests they will be arrested by cops in drag for hate speech. If your not getting the message that the world is increasingly going insane it is not my fault.  If you do nothing about it you will have to live with it.

Obama promises ‘gays’ ’strongest possible bill’

Along with repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and implementing “fully inclusive laws outlawing hate crimes, he says, it’s important to bring “the message of LGBT equality to skeptical audiences as well as friendly ones, and that’s what I’ve done throughout my career.”

Obama sees no evil among the evil because there are no evil demonic people within his communist universalism. Everyone is one collective consciousness evolving to its universal Christ consciousness. If you really want to know what Obama believes you might realize what his top supporters believe. For example watch New Age/New Spirituality Oprah

Sen. Obama coddles evil

Obama likes to compare himself to Ronald Reagan. Reagan, Obama says, negotiated with the USSR. Naturally, Obama neglects to mention that Reagan only negotiated with the USSR after placing missiles in Europe, funding Star Wars, joking about bombing the Soviets and calling the USSR an “evil empire.” Obama’s meetings would be more like an Oprah interview than a Reagan negotiation.

It’s not surprising Obama is willing to have coffee with those who hate America. After all, he allowed an America-hater to preside over his wedding. He sat in the pews while his spiritual mentor railed against Israel. He’s used to Ahmadinejad-like rhetoric – he went to a church full of it for two decades.

Obama has no problem chatting with the world’s bloodiest butchers or sitting in racist churches because he “understands” everyone. Back in November, I wrote that Obama was running as “The Man Who Understands.”

“I know, I have seen the desperation and disorder of the powerless,” he writes in “Dreams From My Father.” That understanding leads him to excuse Islamic terrorism as a function of poverty; it leads him to compare black teens on the South Side of Chicago to jihadis in Indonesia. It leads him to excuse scumbag preachers and kowtow to sadistic tyrants.

There’s clearly one thing Barack Obama doesn’t understand: the nature of evil. That’s why he continues to coddle evil men in both his personal life and his politics.

What is really strange is how all these “Christians” in the Bush administration that claim to have Bible studies and prayer meetings in the White House can then be observed to take positions on critical issues that are totally against what the Bible teaches.

Condoleezza Rice is a very strange and scary person but so is John McCain. McCain and Rice could run on the platform “Scary People for Scary Times”.

My ‘mild’ opposition to Condi Rice for VP

Seems Rice is so anxious to recognize homosexual “marriages” that she can’t even wait for her radical homosexual U.N. efforts to take effect. Maybe she’d do better at Obama headquarters.

Not to mention her “road map for peace,” which has “mildly” negative consequences for the survival of Israel, forcing the Jewish state to give up even more strategically significant land for promises of “peace” from “mild-mannered” terrorists and their mildly fanatical pursuit of world domination and the eradication of Israel from existence.

On my radio program yesterday, I was questioned about exposing the secretary of state’s position without first going to her directly. Oh, I’ve already done that. I asked her to re-examine her radical abortion-on-demand position when I saw her at the inaugural ball back in 2001. I didn’t have time to get to the rest.

Let me just summarize it for you: I am categorically, vehemently, emphatically and intensely opposed to Condoleezza Rice for vice president … to put it “mildly.”

This is an interesting perspective with quite a bit of truth. What I understand from the figures in this article and from what I knew before I read this article is that the world is not capable of ruling themselves through democracy. The schools and media have educated the world to be stupid. Therefore the world still needs the educated elite to run the world for them because they haven’t got a clue. By the way, that is what the ruling elite also believe and that is why democracy is a facade put on by the elite to appease the dumbed down commoners.

American Thinker: Who’s Your Daddy? The Psychology of Most People’s Voting

Some voters still embrace their personal freedom and the responsibility that comes along with it. They study the issues and they vote on the issues. But sadly, they are a distinct minority. Don’t expect the American people to vote on issues. They almost never do. My guess is that more people will vote on how the candidate looks than what the candidate thinks. They vote for whoever meets their personal psychological needs. Thus someone like John McCain can lead the Republican Party even though the “party’s issues” run contrary to his thinking.

Most people don’t like Hillary and can’t imagine her as a parent figure, unless it is the ‘Mommy Dearest’ type.

Obama isn’t old enough to inspire parental psychological needs and the religious mass movement that is driving his campaign will probably falter because of weak faith.

McCain is a hero parent who will protect us from danger, and most people like him. Most Republican voters will overlook his policy positions, just like they overlooked strong and protective Rudy Giuliani’s liberalness. Unless McCain screws up and shows signs of being a bad Dad, McCain will probably win.

Not only will doublethink be the hallmark of any Obama administration. I think Lips Law will be fully in effect. The law put into place by GHW Bush - Read my lips, no new taxes. This infallible law says that whatever a politician promises while running for office he will do the exact opposite after elected.

He preaches unity but he will bring division
He preaches peace but he will bring war
He preaches freedom but he will bring tyranny.
He peaches change but he will bring tried and failed socialism.
etc

American Thinker: Doublethink and the Liberal Mind

George Orwell claimed that there was something more calculated at work when politicians begin to claim for example that “Slavery is Freedom” or that “Hate is Love,” or in Mao Tse Tung’s words, that “Compulsion is Voluntary.” The new and improved Democratic Party version seems to be that “Diversity is Unity.” Orwell called this “doublethink” and he claimed that it was a condition endemic to the totalitarian mind. It meant the ability “to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory” and “to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies.” For example, a liberal socialist political platform usually involves “liberating” us from our attachments to property, families and nation in the name of “freedom.” When the State chooses for us, however, the result is slavery. Doublethink in Mr. Obama’s case (”Diversity is Unity!”) gives him the luxury of defending not only the divisive and intolerant Reverend Wright and his party’s divisive policies over the years, but it also allows him to be seen as the savior who will finally make America whole.

Since it is difficult to recall a time when national unity was high on the list of Democratic Party priorities, the coming months should be a rather curious time for many. For instance, when Obama runs in the general election, will his supporters cover their old “Celebrate Difference” bumper stickers with a new “Celebrate Unity” sticker? Will the old “rainbow” flag be replaced by a new flag sporting a picture of a melting pot? Doublethink, however, can help with these exasperating decisions: just display both.

In all seriousness however we need to be aware that doublethink is at bottom a form of intellectual laziness, irresponsibility, or a form of “having your cake and eating it too” with a disdain for objective limits and consistency.

Detroit is the nation showcase for liberalism. With what we see in Detroit you would think that people, especially black people would get the message. Instead we see the same mistakes spreading to big cities all over the nation. The people of the U.S. have become so bamboozled by liberalism they are actually considering making a liberal product of Detroit their President.

If you wish to experience America’s future under liberalism just move to Detroit.

Detroit’s tragic love affair with liberalism

The liberal Democrat hacks running Michigan into the ground (complicit with the pathetic, country club Republicans) aren’t the least interested in real solutions for Detroit because, as I stated before, parasitic liberalism thrives in chaos, envy and victimhood. Also, Mayor Kilpatrick’s sycophantic cronies realize when the mayor goes down, that they will all go down together. That’s why the mayor’s appointees publicly and vociferously disparage anyone who dares speak out against Kilpatrick, including daily attacks against prosecutor Worthy. Nevertheless, tick-tock-tick-tock, His Honor indeed has date with destiny.AMERICA! Get yourself a big bucket of popcorn and a giant Coke, because the show KKK (King Kwame Kilpatrick) is about the give the world will make what the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) did to my people in Birmingham, in Selma, in Atlanta, in Mississippi, look like child’s play.

Show me a monopoly (liberalism) and I’ll show you a tyranny (Detroit).

Ann haven’t you heard, half of city people do not even get through high schools? If they can even read these have little reading comprehension. Americans don’t nominate loons like this one because they have intellect. Most get the little information that they can retain from talking heads on TV who get their brainwashing instructions from the power elite running the world. Ann you do not still believe the facade of democracy, do you?

Obama’s Dimestore ‘Mein Kampf’ - HUMAN EVENTS

If characters from “The Hills” were to emote about race, I imagine it would sound like B. Hussein Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams From My Father.”Has anybody read this book? Inasmuch as the book reveals Obama to be a flabbergasting lunatic, I gather the answer is no. Obama is about to be our next president: You might want to take a peek. If only people had read “Mein Kampf” …

Nearly every page — save the ones dedicated to cataloguing the mundane details of his life — is bristling with anger at some imputed racist incident.

Think about this. Housing has already dropped 10 percent if it drops 30 percent like many think it will remove over 6 Trillion in wealth from Americans.

Local governments will be collecting far less taxes on property meaning that they will have to drastically cut services or raise everyone’s taxes.

Those who have less then 30 percent equity in their house will have to come up with money to sell it and they will have to come up with more money to pay selling costs.

All this means that there are not going to be a whole lot of people moving in the next few years, meaning that they will not be buying the house you are trying to sell either.

In addition, few will be able to get home equity loans because they will not have enough home equity. Anyone who can look at this information and not see a very deep recession in the future is a blind optimist.

So who wants to take the rap as president during this economic downturn?

Lords of Housing: Believing in the $22.5 Trillion Housing Market. » Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

If we then extrapolate this information with the recent Case-Shiller Index decline, we realize that over $2.41 trillion of residential housing value has evaporated into thin air($20.15/.893)=($22.5644) | $22.5644 - $20.15 = $2.41 trillion

Keep in mind that we are not using the peak price of the market.
Estimates range from $23 to $24 trillion. It is becoming rather clear
that when all is said and done, we may be seeing 20 to 30 percent
nationwide declines in home prices. How much more equity will this
destroy? Let us run the scenario further:

Drop	Equity Lost
Current 10.7% drop	$2.41 trillion
20% drop	$4.28 trillion
30% drop	$6.29 trillion

The problem of course is not necessarily with those with no
mortgage, but many who bought at peak prices with very little equity.
Those that went in with no money down, 5, 10, even 20 percent down
stand to be underwater when the market reaches its bottom.

Just the plain facts why it is not racism to fear black men. In spite of what Obama implied in his speech.

American Thinker: Typical White Fact-Based Reasoning

That is, the chance of just any person you see on the street murdering someone this year is about 5 of 100,000 (assuming you see a random sample of people). The same chance of a white person is 3.5 of 100,000. And the same chance for a black person is 19.7 of 100,000. That means a black person is 5.6 times more likely than a white person to be a murderer.It is totally rational for a any person (including Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama’s grandmother) to fear a black person more than a white one. In fact, you should fear them 5.6 times more.

I totally agree Chuck Norris but your not listening to me. Many Americans and I want you to run for President on a third party ticket to put a stop to this insanity.

Guns, God and gays

I was also saddened this past week to read about the comic in the University of Virginia’s pre-Holy Week, school-sanctioned student paper. The Cavalier Daily published a cartoon that pictured a naked man smoking a cigarette in bed with a woman in her underwear who asks, “Come on God, be honest – did you really get a vasectomy? I can’t let Joseph find out about this.” The man, who is now revealed as God, replies, “Well, Mary, you’re f—ed.”How abhorring it is when the freedom of the press is abused to demean the biblical God and the most sacred couple in Christendom, especially right before Easter. If the cartoon depicted Allah or Muhammad, there undoubtedly would have been a national decry of bigotry. Yet it seems in vogue to disgrace Christianity, and so it was brushed under the rug of contempt and barely highlighted by any news agency.

I am one of those individuals that know where that “unfounded” fear of black men that Obama’s white grandmother had actually came from. I grew up in a blue class neighborhood that increasingly was being replaced with blacks.

I had to walk through a black section of town for four years while going to high school and there was not one time that when not walking with a group that I did not fear for my safety. I had rocks thrown at me that certainly could have killed me. I had guns held on me and have had knife attacks and have been robbed over pennies. I still have physical and mental scars from the many encounters while walking through black neighborhoods in broad day light. Whites would did not walk in these areas at night if they valued their life.

Even in the home neighborhood it became more and more dangerous to just walk down the street as the neighborhood turned black.

So will you ignoramuses who talk about “unfounded” white fears of black men please tell me what is “unfounded” about our fears when you blacks attack us in your neighborhoods? If you white Obama supporters believe his insinuation about our unfounded white fears I will drive you to a black area of town even today and you can experience for yourself your “unfounded” fears of black men as you walk back!

One in 16 black men are now in prison and four times as many were either in prison or would be in prison had they ever got caught. There is nothing unfounded about the fear of black men when they are with their buddies on the streets. If you really think so, I invite you to take your white butt on a walk some night in a black area and find out the plain truth for yourself. The truth is that it is not racism to fear blacks where it is truly dangerous, it is common sense. Over the years I have met many good black men but I still would not walk to their inner city homes at night and it has nothing to do with “My” racism.

Obama digs hole deeper

In a speech being hailed by his supporters as historic, Obama explained, “I can no more disown him (Rev. Jeremiah Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”

” would argue that Obama’s characterization of his grandmother fits both of those definitions. It reveals his belief that the “typical white person” harbors unfounded fears of black men. It also reveals his willingness to caricature even his own grandmother – abuse her, if you will – as a racist in the biggest speech of his life, one that was carefully crafted for maximum political advantage.”

That is the sum total of the reason given for Bill Richardson selling out the Clinton’s who first elevated him past barrio chief.  Could that something about Obama be his evil? Or is it just because you want the number 2 position with your 30 pieces of silver?

First a Tense Talk With Clinton, Then Richardson Backs Obama - New York Times

“There’s something special about this guy,” Mr. Richardson said of Mr. Obama. “I’ve been trying to figure it out, but it’s very good.”Mr. Clinton helped elevate Mr. Richardson to the national stage by naming him his energy secretary and ambassador to the United Nations. And Mr. Clinton left no doubt that he viewed Mr. Richardson’s support as important to his wife’s campaign: He even flew to New Mexico to watch the Super Bowl with Mr. Richardson as part of the Clintons’ high-profile courtship of him.

But Mr. Richardson stopped returning Mr. Clinton’s calls days ago, Mr. Clinton’s aides said. And as of Friday, Mr. Richardson said, he had yet to pick up the phone to tell Mr. Clinton of his decision.

The reaction of some of Mr. Clinton’s allies suggests that might have been a wise decision. “An act of betrayal,” said James Carville, an adviser to Mrs. Clinton and a friend of Mr. Clinton.

“Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic,” Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week.

There is no question that there is a minority segment of blacks in this nation who blame whites for everything just like Pastor Wright. I am sure his church attracted all in the area that wanted a pastor expressing their own hate. The real question is why would Americans elect to President someone who identifies with a racist hate Church and a hate pastor. To say this is the black culture is only true if you are part of that minority segment of the black culture. There is a larger black culture that does not hate so why not join with them? Why identify with the radicals unless you identify with them?

Even Obama’s agenda shows hate for the unborn. His Marxist like socialism shows his hate for the American system where people succeed through their effort and hard work and not by government preference programs and quotas.

Frankly, blacks today get preferences over whites in everything. If there is any anger coming from whites today against blacks it is not because of there skin shade. It is because many are handed opportunities that they never worked for or that are unavailable to whites. Other blacks have rejected civil society and they embrace a criminal counterculture that is destroying society. Still other blacks put in leadership positions those who are obviously racists.

Throw grandma under the bus

We treat blacks like children, constantly talking about their temper tantrums right in front of them with airy phrases about black anger. I will not pat blacks on the head and say, “Isn’t that cute?” As a post-racial American, I do not believe “the legacy of slavery” gives black people the right to be permanently ill-mannered.Obama tried to justify Wright’s deranged rants by explaining that “legalized discrimination” is the “reality in which Rev. Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up.” He said that a “lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families.”

That may accurately describe the libretto of “Porgy and Bess,” but it has no connection to reality.

McCain in the only Presidential candidate who gets this issue correct.

McCain: Terrorism threatens all we hold dear | Jerusalem Post

“If Hamas/Hizbullah succeeds here, they are going to succeed everywhere, not only in the Middle East, but everywhere. Israel isn’t the only enemy,” Arizona Sen. McCain said, in the only interview he is giving to the Israeli media during his visit here.”They are dedicated to the extinction of everything that the US, Israel and the West believe and stand for. So America does have an interest in what happens here, far above and beyond our alliance with the State of Israel.”

Americans have been lied to by government for many years about inflation. The inflation rate is much higher then what the government reports. By lying about inflation they erode our standard of living by an average of 3 percent a year and then they tell you how good the economy is and Americans are making more then ever. If that were true how come it now takes two people to work in a family to make end meet when thirty years ago it took one? The buying power of the average wage earner or those who live on pensions or savings has been going down for many years.

The real puzzle to me is how the government gets away with it? Why has the government not been sued for this obvious fraud on the American people?

What’s America’s real inflation rate?

Greenspan’s own solution was to keep interest rates artificially low, as low as the 1 percent interest rates Greenspan in 2003 aspired to hold that low for years – while simultaneously rigging the CPI numbers.The Greenspan years can be characterized as a strategy of lying about inflation to avoid the adverse political consequences of being honest and facing the true cost-of-living music.

By lying about inflation, Greenspan justified 1 percent interest rates, which in 2003 were the lowest rates in 45 years, in a determined plan to keep the economy growing while he was at the helm.

But one result of the Greenspan liquidity party was to fuel real inflation.

So, when you wonder why food and gasoline cost so much when the government says inflation is low, just remember: You are being lied to – something we suspect you figured out long ago, just by going to the supermarket and the gas station.

The government is doing everything in its power to insure that we have an energy crises for decades to come. Lawyers run the government, are they really that incredibly stupid or do they really see advantage for themselves in constant future litigation over every sort of energy proposal? That also includes CO2 litigation.

Get most lawyers out of Washington and we would be well on our way to solving our problems.

‘Why Is Everyone Lying About Energy?’ - Alan Caruba - Mar 17, 08

In terms of our enormous energy needs, Congress and the White House are seriously mismanaging America.Energy is the “master resource.” Without it everything else slows, stalls, and stops. The nation’s economy is entirely dependent on our ability to function in a world where oil, natural gas, and coal are global commodities. They don’t have a nationality. They have a price. And that is set by supply and demand, not the federal government.

The government is literally wasting billions on “alternative forms” of energy and “climate change.” It should be encouraging the building of more refineries, more nuclear fission, coal or gas-fired plants to generate electricity, more pipelines. It should be eliminating the restrictions on access oil, gas, and coal within and these sources from beyond our nation’s borders.

The President, the candidates competing to be the next President, and members of Congress are all lying to Americans about the realities of energy. The situation is likely to get much worse before it ever becomes better.

There are only three possibilities:

Obama did not attend that church enough to know what the church was preaching (hardly a picture of a mature Christian).

Obama agreed with what the church was preaching (hardly a picture of a person with Christian discernment or with mainstream American views).

Or Obama only joined that church because it had the influence to give him political power (Hardly a reason for any true Christian to join a radical racist church).

Lets get real. We know what Obama is. His wife reflects his views. His amoral social positions reflect his views. There are millions of people in this nation of many different shades who blame others for their own moral problems. How many blacks today are in leadership because they use black’s hate of others for their own political ends? I could make a list of them. You know who they are, they are talking head media stars.

Does America really want to have a doubled mouthed smooth talking con man, with his shady past and socialist views running our country? I just explained in a previous post why illegal drug users are guilty of murder. Obama was a drug user. Considering all these things that we know about Obama, are Americans that incredibly naive to make him President because He can chant slogans like “yes we can” or “change”?

Having said that, Hillary has her own issues.

American Thinker: Knowing Obama by the Company He Keeps

Because, as my wise grandmother used to say, “you are influenced by the company you keep.”Barack Obama persistently contends that he has not been influenced by the racist sermons of Jeremiah Wright or Wright’s mentor, James H. Cone.

One must wonder now whether Obama is fooling himself, or us.

Hillary has already marched in a “gay” pride parade when she was First Lady of the United States. I recall she was marching right behind men in thongs. Now she wants to do it as President. Is this the dignity we want in a President?  Watch out though, Obama is trying his best to kiss up to the homosexuals as well. Perhaps he will become the first president to march in thongs. What a touching thought. Brings tears to my eyes.

Senator Clinton: I want to be first U.S. president to march in gay pride parade (OneNewsNow.com)

However, one presidential candidate has made a pledge to do just that – Senator Hillary Clinton (D-New York). She says that Clinton made her pledge in the Washington Blade – a Washington newspaper serving the homosexual community. “…Really now! We’ve seen these gay pride parades in San Francisco and elsewhere,” exclaims Donnelly. “Is this really an appropriate role for the President or the Commander in Chief of our armed forces? I don’t think so…”

A am waiting for the The liberally twisted red letter Bible to come out. It will be all red.

Democratic Scripture twisting

Forget Islamic radicals blowing up bodies when we have leaders and media who think it is hateful and wrong to defend and protect our children from sexual indoctrination, sexual agendas and false history. We blow their minds up already well before their bodies might blow up due to an Islamic-radical attack. At least if some of the anti-God and anti-American thugs can get our kids’ minds twisted in time, our children can fall apart with a well-funded STD. Hillary and Obama will make sure our diseased children are cared for. That is, the kids who have survived through the sea of abortions. I’m certain there must be Scriptures supporting abortion with Obama and Hillary’s Bible bak-masking machine.

A little white lie helps keep blacks enslaved to the Democratic Party of government sponsored poverty.

The truth about Democrats and blacks

Did you know that Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican?I sure didn’t – till I read Ronald Kessler’s arresting column on the Internet just recently. He was liberally quoting Frances Rice, chairman of the National Black Republican Association, in which she was describing the Democrat Party as the “architect of modern day racism.”

This was just the first of many fascinating and surprising accusations from someone who is certainly in a position to know what she’s talking about. She’s a retired Army lieutenant colonel and lawyer, and she avers that it was Republicans who pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congress – and that the GOP still stands for empowering blacks to help them out of poverty, more than the Democrats. In contrast, she says, the liberal party pushes programs that keep her fellow blacks dependent on government handouts and temporary “fixes,” and encourages them to see themselves as victims.

She even charges that in every election cycle, Democrat operatives fan out into the black communities and preach hatred against the Republican Party, to get them to cast protest votes against perceived prejudice. And this activity has succeeded insidiously, convincing several generations of black Americans that the Democrat Party is their only hope.

Joe Farah thinks the ban on light bulbs is really just a government power play. I take it that he think that this is a trial balloon and if these fascists get away with total control over our light bulbs they will soon go for total control over our lives.

Joe is correct about the fascist power play and where it is all heading but he misses one point. Politicians are indeed that stupid! I mean, they believe that light bulbs will help save the world. Not Jesus, the Light of the world, mind you! Light bulbs! Need I say anything more?

So, now you know how many politicians it takes to screw up a light bulb.

War on perfectly good light bulbs

This action makes no sense for so many reasons, it’s tough to list them all. But let me try:

• Like I said, the action exceeds Congress’ authority. Show me where in the
  Constitution it empowers Congress to ban a perfectly safe and useful
  product in use for 100 years?
• There is no manmade, catastrophic global warming – the reason this and other draconian actions are being taken by lawmakers and policy wonks.
• Incandescent bulbs are less expensive than the fluorescent alternatives.
• You can actually buy incandescent made in the U.S. by U.S. companies – not true of fluorescents, virtually all made in China.
• Fluorescents are dangerous and contain trace amounts of mercury, a highly toxic
  substance environmentalists have been complaining about for years.
• Fluorescent bulbs are hideously ugly.
• Fluorescents don’t last as long as manufacturers claim.
• The light fluorescents cast is offensive to many, and studies claim it can be harmful to some.
• Fluorescents don’t come in all the sizes incandescent do.
• Fluorescents can’t be used in all places incandescents can.
• Whatever happened to choice?

Americans like the Europeans are losing control of their government. The people  have become apathetic and think that government will look out for them without the checks and balances designed by the founders of our nation. On the contrary, government without oversight by the people turns toward tyranny.

Following Europe toward tyranny

The government we are moving toward is an administrative government, in which elected representatives become little more than a token to the form of government created by the U.S. Constitution. When any government is empowered to impose rules of behavior without the consent of the governed, freedom is the victim. When government is empowered – without the consent of the governed – to define what freedom may be exercised, the result is a dictatorship, whether by a Hitler, a supreme soviet, or an appointed Inter-Parliamentary Group.Where are the Americans who still believe that the best possible government is a government whose power is limited by the consent of the governed? They are certainly not in a Congress that allows NAFTA, the SPP and the North American Community to continue.

Amen to what this black man says about the Obama’s that nobody is allowed to criticize just because they are black. Yet, you will not hear a peep out of these same people when it does not serve there own black instructs.

Our next Teflon president?

Where is the outrage by blacks who feign insult and cry racism when Barack Obama, the potential next president, pledges his uncompromised support of abortion – and thus tangential support of Planned Parenthood?Planned Parenthood is the progeny of Margaret Sanger, who said there was an “ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” Sanger also wrote, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population” – a job Planned Parenthood is accomplishing to the tune of approximately 1,500 unborn black children a day.

Where is the outrage against a black presidential candidate who has fiercely supported the systematic exterminatio