Tony may have left his heart in San Francisco but the people who live there lost their mind.
The sex perverted city of San Francisco is at it once again. The majority of residents will soon not allow enforcement of laws related to prostitution and sex workers. When looking at what they are actually approving you will see that they are voting for a city where anything goes including abetting pedophiles and human traffickers. There is no end to San Francisco’s sex perversion. Now the innocent will be further preyed upon by inhuman predators. There is nothing that brings judgment from God quicker than the harming of innocent children. How can this city not soon be judged? If you are wise you will get yourself and your family out of this city.
Measure would protect pimps, not prostitutes
the average age of entry into prostitution is 12 to 14. The office of San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris, who opposes the initiative, has encountered prostituted children as young as 9.
Yet the San Francisco ballot measure completely ignores the prostitution of children. The measure simply states, “Law enforcement agencies shall not allocate any resources for the investigation and prosecution of prostitutes for prostitution.” Astonishingly, there’s no exemption that encourages police to enforce the law for minors.
If the measure passes, the city is likely to become an international haven for pimps who peddle girls and boys, and perverts seeking sex with minors.
And where does that leave Bay Area youth?
“They want new and young,” Jasmine, a former teen prostitute from Oakland who now volunteers for the nonprofit Sage Project, which fights sexual exploitation, explained to me.
The other big problem: The measure prohibits city law enforcement from applying for grants to prosecute human traffickers. That’s right, this measure gives a free pass to the human sex-slave trade - in a city that is a central stop for international sex-trade rings.
A proponent of the measure told Fox News that she believes that it will pass with 75 percent of the vote because the city is “sex-positive.”
Violence and pain are the inevitable outcome for those steeped in this dehumanizing way of life. Young women wooed into the life quickly age to the point where they cannot net the high-incomes their pimps demand. They become addicted to drugs. They learn to commit new crimes. Until the day they find they are disposable.
Or as Wilson noted, “We treat animals better.”
So do not tell Jasmine that if San Francisco decriminalizes prostitution, it will do so because the city cares about prostitutes. This measure really is a gift, not so much to so-called sex workers, as to pimps, pedophiles and human traffickers. As Jasmine sees it, if the ballot initiative passes, “That’s basically saying the city does not care.”