The article below is a very thought provoking article. No rational nation should willfully take this risk and put itself in this position. Be it Hitler, Mao or Chavez the socialists often first get in power through a popular election. After that they change the nation to conform to their own image. Do you really think Obama will not attempt to do that? If so you are naive. He will have the Congress in his pocket and he will appoint to the Supreme Court only those that believe in a living Constitution. That means the end of the America that your forefathers set up.

Why is Obama now in this position? Ask Oprah? Ask the CFR. They think they are “spiritually” enlightened gifts to the world that will bring the world to correct single mindedness through socialist team concepts, group think, and peer pressure (facilitated brainwashing). If you do not go along you will be ostracized or even persecuted.

When Obama talks about more government regulation he is not at all kidding, he is dead serious. He will want to control everything and even at the local level he will set up neighborhood groups to establish control. Obama was created by, promoted by and is a puppet of extreme Far Left radical globalists. Their worldview is certainly not the worldview of most America’s.

If you think government does not listen to the people now just wait until Obama, Reed and Pelosi and a liberal Supreme Court control everything from how much energy you can use, to what you can say in public, to guns.

The article quoted below ought to wake the living dead but we all know that they only read the Left controlled press. This further article about the crime of the century should make it abundantly clear that you do not want liberals to gain control over all government. However, I believe they will because Americans simply are not getting it. If that is not enough to get you thinking you might read this article about Obama being a facilitator and not a executive. Just want do you think he will facilitate? He will facilitate group think and he will do it right out of the world socialist playbook. He will use global warming, economic crises, foreign wars and who knows what else to make you fear enough to give up all to government. If you are still not convinced you might read this article Obama’s henchmen and the rise of commufascism. Maybe McCain is not that much better but at least he will be some kind of a check on the Far Left. If Obama is elected the radicals take over America until the next American revolution.

American Thinker: What If Obama Doesn’t Have America’s Best Interests at Heart?

I have known many “players” in my life, notably in big corporations, who might have easily written, as Obama has, that they “serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.” All of them turned out to be the ones who truly did have malicious intent. They were the ones who were survival-of-the-fittest professionals, ready to adapt to any circumstance and say whatever had to be said in order to win the game. They were the ones who built careers on the backs of people of more substance but less savvy, people who were either forced or were willing to lie face-down and be walked on. They were the ones whose artful dishonesty came with eloquence and a smile, concealing designs that were, in the end, hardly conceivable as virtuous. Often — very often — they were completely unqualified to lead. Always they found majorities who loved them.

The reaction to Obama by the people of America is disturbing, to say the least. I have not seen anything quite like it in America. Ronald Reagan, for example, was also very popular, but his name evoked enthusiasm and, at his death, reverence. But never the sort of idolatry inspired by Obama. Even Obama’s detractors do not seem to loathe him, at least not in the way that they have loathed the Clintons or Gore or Kerry. I have heard more than one Republican say, “Well, if I have to put up with him for four or more years, at least he’s tolerable.” Obama’s mass appeal is uncommon and frightening.

So, I am now imagining a very real scenario — similar to what I have seen on a smaller scale in the corporate world — about to be played out on a national, and possibly global, level. Our country seems to be ready to put into the seat of power a man — good-looking, charismatic, silver-tongued, to be sure — who has almost no experience, has never served in an executive capacity, has barely held a real job, and has no record of success other than his remarkable campaign.

This is a man who in less than two years has arisen as a political messiah. He has mesmerized an emergent block of college-age voters (whose chief sources of information, by the way, are comedians). He has inspired “Obama youth” corps and Maoist-style choirs of praise. He has been dubbed “the One” by his Matrix-saturated worshippers. He has captured the hearts and minds of half of America, nearly all of the media, and most of the world itself.

If Obama is just another bumbling Democrat, who, armed with a lot of really bad policies, simply wants to do America proud, well, then, if elected, he will muddle through the next four to eight years trying to implement change, will be hindered by the American political system, will enervate liberals and thus energize conservatives, and, eventually, the tide will turn. Like the aftermath of a very disagreeable season, we will have weathered the storm, will survey the damage, and will send in the rescue teams to rebuild.

But then again: What if Obama doesn’t have America’s best interest at heart? What if his candidacy has to do with the willful and radical recreation of the country, one that embraces Marxist ideals, i.e., socialism in some form or another? What if the “change we can believe in” — the central theme of his campaign — is directed subversion of the Republic in favor of the sort of Utopian, collectivist state that radicals like Bill Ayers have been dreaming of since the Sixties?

Who needs revolution when one can use evolution? If Congress turns decidedly left, Obama will have a good chance to help the Supreme Court do the same. At that point, the Left’s idea of a “living” Constitution, which allows interpretation to supplant the process of amendment, will be used to make us all believers.

Full article

Did you know the $700 billion bail out bill was really about $850 billion after all the pork was added? That is how they changed votes. They bribed each vote with pork. We are seeing today how good the bailout did, as of this writing the stock market is down about 10 percent since the great rescue bill was signed a few days ago. Guess what? Our champions of fiscal responsibility running for President signed the bill with $112 billion of pork added. In the last debate they were arguing about saving some of the $16 billion in earmark spending. However, they just signed a bill that contained $112 Billion in pork in one shot and our dumb president signed it without even reading it. Someone might think that they all need to take some Zanax or were being blackmailed. Who knows, those who hold our dollars like China and the oil rich states may have given them an ultimatum. Pass the bail-out bill or the dollar goes down the toilet. That’s about the only thing that explains the panic.

If McCain or Obama still have the gall to lie in our face about cutting pork everyone should turn off their TV’s or walk out of there rallies. Why enable liars? What good will it be to try to save me a pork chop in the future when you just proved to America that you will vote for a huge pork feast.

Believe me, the bail-outs are not over. The FDIC will now need $200 billion to bail out the failing banks, State governments will need bailing out, Unemployment insurance will need bailing out and many more taxpayer bailouts will come in the future. Tax revenues will also fall and taxes are likely to be cut to stimulate the economy. By the time we get through this crises (if we do) we could easily be $15 trillion in debt. Those nations who are bailing us out now with low interest rate loans are not likely to do so after this crises is past for the world. But we will still have $15 trillion of debt to service at a interest rate given to a nation that spends way beyond its means. Think about what that means to this nation in the future.

The bail-a-holics

The truth is most lawmakers voted to pass the bill but don’t have a clue what is in this 500-plus page legislation, which was birthed in the White House just two weeks ago as an infant of only three pages. It was then voted down at the Capitol a week later in its adolescent-sized 100 pages. And of course, in good bureaucratic fashion, it passed mature criteria when it was more than five times the size and packed with governmental goodies. And the president signed it just an hour after receiving it from Capitol Hill on Friday – I guess that speed reading course paid off.

In the fine print, inserted between the lines of that 500-plus page bill, are loads of fiscal additives and more financial toxic relief. Yes, the rumors are true. H.R. 1424 – Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which has now been signed into law, officially includes more than $112 billion in political hors d’oeuvres and pork barrel additives that have absolutely no direct relation to the Wall Street bailout. Among them are:

* $6 million in tax breaks for wooden arrow manufacturers in Oregon;
* $148 million in tax breaks for wool-producing companies,
* $128 million in tax breaks for the manufacturers of car racing tracks;
* $10 million in tax breaks to small television and film producers;
* $223 million in tax breaks for Alaskan fisherman;
* $33 million for corporations operating in American Samoa;
* $192 million in tax breaks for rum producers in the Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

What the &^%$#@?! And that’s just a drop in the bailout bucket. And We the Taxpayers are just supposed to sit back and take it in the arrears?

All is not lost, yet. We still have a voice in this bailout – it’s in the ballot box in November’s elections. The remedy for our country is clear: Congress doesn’t need another bailout, but a roundhouse kick right out the door. I plead with you to join me and millions of others in a voter revolution – to oust political and congressional corruption and stalemate. If representatives from your state and districts voted to pass this bailout bill and gamble nearly $1 trillion of our children’s and grandchildren’s taxpaying money, in addition to showing the reckless fiscal behavior of stuffing such a bill with perks and pork, you must not re-elect any such wayward incumbent.

Full article

This is one great article about all the different aspects of global warming and it has the very latest information. This one article alone should make you question the sanity or honesty of many well known people promoting carbon legislation.

One demented preacher in the news today said that man caused global warming deniers are like child molesters. I want to reply to him that those who promote this carbon hoax on the world are murders! They are causing legislation and unnecessary burdens that will bring untold misery and death to many of the poor of the world. It will even cause famine and revolutions. But what do they care, many leading this facade think that poor people are useless eaters that the world would be better off without anyway.

If that is not enough carbon legislation will bring in world fascist where everything everyone does in the world will be controlled by carbon bean counters controlled by unelected elitist global governors.

FrontPage Magazine

The scientific consensus today is slowly beginning to shift away from the catastrophism of Gore, Suzuki and the United Nations IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, to suggest that the human contribution to global warming is far less than originally assumed and that a meteorological calamity is highly unlikely. (The IPCC, which certified and entrenched the so-called “scientific consensus,” is essentially a political body with an agenda of its own.) See Inhofe EPW Press Blog, Daily Tech online, and the journal Energy and Environment, whose findings are based on a survey of the ISI (Institute for Scientific Information) Web of Science database covering almost 9000 scientific publications.

Other reports conclude that “solar variability” is the major component in climate change and will run its course regardless of human intervention. As David Douglass writes in the International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society (December 2007), in a peer-reviewed article co-authored with several prominent scientists, “The observed pattern of warming . . . does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.”

The most sophisticated climate models indicate an undeniable discrepancy between surface and tropospheric temperature changes, which points to the sun as the primary agent in the long-term, fluctuating temperature curve. John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, patiently explains that the sun, which contains 99.8% of the mass of the solar system, in its hydrogen-fueled atomic fusion process, “consumes more mass in a second than all the fossil fuel ever burned on Earth,” the terrestrial impact of which reduces the human input to global warming to a level of insignificance. Though Coleman doesn’t cite actual figures, the fact is that the sun pours in excess of a million billion megawatt-hours annually on the earth. But he does quote the highly respected Australian mathematician and former carbon consultant for the Australian government, David Evans, who argues that “carbon emissions don’t cause global warming.” According to Evans, the IPCC models are wrong and the mathematics show that the human signature in the atmosphere is missing (KUSI News online, November 8, 2007).

Czech President Vaclav Klaus, author of the soon-to-be-translated Blue Planet in Green Chains, is on the mark when he warns of the irrationality of the bullish “global warming” industry: “As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism . . . Let us not scare ourselves with catastrophic forecasts, or use them to defend and promote irrational interventions in human lives”

NASA Administrator Michael D. Griffin, who has professed some skepticism about certain aspects of global warming research, especially with regard to theoretical computer models that tend, as he says, to run before they have learned to walk, was startled to realize that “you can’t express any sort of contrary opinion or a comment without it being treated almost as a religious issue” (Newsmax.com, March 17, 2008). The doxastic progression here is: science-politics-religion. To use Irving Kristol’s word, human beings are, whether we like it or not, “theotropic” beings.

Indeed, the metamorphosis of politics into a debased form of religion may be the bedrock definition of that otherwise debatable term, “fascism,” further specified as “ecofascism” by Janet Biehl and Peter Staudermaier in their book of that title.

There is much good information from this Science & Public Policy Institute website and Lord Christopher Monckton. This is the fellow in Britian that sued Al Gore in court, won the lawsuit and forced schools in Britain to also give an opposing view to Al Gore’s global warming propaganda film. We need this to happen in the U.S. because hot air is filling empty heads and the consequences of letting them pass Cap and Trade laws or carbon taxes will bring an economic disaster and achieve no climate result.

What is found on this website is about all anyone needs to know about global warming to know that we should not be going forward with CO2 cap and trade or carbon taxes. After reading the information tell your congressional representatives your opinion because they are taking up this issue next month.

Global Warming Science and Public Policy - The Cost and Futility of Trading Hot Air

For decades environmental activists have insisted that capitalism is not a “sustainable” (sufficient to “save the planet”) economic system. We now hear brazen declarations that democracy is no longer a “sustainable” political process. Al Gore lends a popular, philosophical/theological underpinning to collectivist impulses by casting the root of all environmental evils – real and imagined – in the scientific and industrial/technological revolutions. Put differently, for Gore and the EDF, the planetary environment, not human life, appears the supreme standard of value. Therefore, everything, most importantly Science and Economics, must be pried away from the benefit of man and pressed into total service of the State.

Given just a decade or two of such “sustainable” policies, bolstered by Gore’s religion, the world will be well on its way to a new Dark Ages, and the human misery it breeds.

The American people who owe their long, comfortable and healthy lives to the accomplishments of modern industry, technology, medicine and affordable fossil energy ought to be outraged by activists’ claims and policies. They should come to grasp the terrible costs and futility of the left’s policies; they must understand that life lived as the left envision it for them and their children is baneful; life lived in submission to the hard natural forces of climate and disease, increasingly lived without labor-saving technology, without the fruits of sophisticated agricultural techniques, and without modern medicine, sanitation, electrification and transportation systems is, to borrow a phrase from Thomas Hobbes, “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.”

Economic growth requires energy growth, and restricting energy growth through self-interested international agreements such as Kyoto or domestic policies such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade schemes is a recipe for global poverty and human deaths.

THATCHER’S RULE, “You have to get the big ones right”, applies with the greatest force to those fields of policy where wrong decisions could kill millions. The international community too often gets the big ones wrong, and kills tens of millions, and does not care much.

When the same lobbies that now demand action on climate change did so on DDT 35 years ago, they got the science as wrong then as now. Instead of restricting DDT to interior spraying of dwellings, they had it banned outright. Result: 30-50 million (and counting) needlessly dead of malaria. Dr. Arata Kochi of the WHO, announcing the end of the ban in 2006, said that too often politics predominated: now it was (and is) necessary for the science and the data to prevail.

With climate change, politics regrettably predominates. This time, there is a dangerous complication: politicized science. The surprisingly small group of scientists who started and still stir the “global warming” scare have undesirably close financial links with politicians and corporations. Yet the notion that “global warming” is so severe a threat that it demands major increases in taxation and regulation, coupled with deep, strategic cuts in the Western economies, would only be defensible if all of the following propositions were true –

1. “The scientists, politicians, and news media behind ‘global warming’ are honest”: They are not;
2. “The debate is over and all credible climate scientists are agreed”: It is not; they are not;
3. “Temperature today has risen exceptionally fast and above natural variability”: It has not;
4. “Changes in solar activity do not significantly impact today’s global warming”: They do;
5. “Greenhouse-gas increases are the main reason why it is getting warmer”: They are not;
6. “The fingerprint of anthropogenic greenhouse warming is clearly present”: It is absent;
7. “Computer models are accurate enough to predict the climate reliably”: They cannot be;
8. “Global warming is to blame for present and future climate disasters”: It is not;
9. “Mitigating climate change will be cost-effective”: It will not;
10. “Taking precautions, just in case, would be the responsible course”: It would not be.

Each of these ten conformist propositions, every one of which must be shown true before substantial policy changes can be considered advisable, is demonstrated to be questionable at best, false at worst.

There has been serious, serial scientific dishonesty, misrepresentation, and exaggeration. Increasing numbers of peer-reviewed papers are expressing open doubts about all of the main points of “global warming” theory. Today’s temperature is well within natural climate variability.

Wow! This three part article is a must read for those with a brain left to think for themselves. Jon Ryter gives many arguments against Co2 caused global warming all the way from the history of Greenland to modern science. He also gets into the inevitable future revolution against the Red’s turned into Green’s that Ryter calls “Watermelons”. It occurs when the world finally gets the message that all the suffering brought on the world through this deliberate fraud was needless and really a means for elitists like Al Gore to take control of the world.

I don’t know if it will play out the way Jon wrote but this is a good read.

Jon Christian Ryter — Watermelons and Eco-Idiots, Part 1

The scientific reality of Greenland runs counter to the fables about Greenland generated by ecoalarmists to benefit politicians who want to persuade the gullible of the world that humankind is responsible for what the ecoalarmists believe is carbon dioxide-generated global warming. In their minds, the current warming trends in Greenland is proof positive that catastrophic flooding that —caused by man—will erase the coastal lowlands around the world within the next 100 years.

Watermelon Red

Shortly after former Vice President Al Gore, Jr. received an Oscar for his largely fabricated movie, An Inconvenient Truth, blaming what science knows to be a cyclic event caused by solar eruptions on humankind, he announced that the debate was over. Global warming was settled. While Gore may believe that scientific consensus agrees with his position, in point of fact, it does not.

Before we start looking at the scientific numbers—those who believe global warming is caused by man verses those who know it is a cyclic event caused by solar eruptions—and the physical evidence that disputes the ecoalarmists, it is important for the layman to understand one simple truth about global warming: green is the new red. Yesterday’s socialists are today’s environmentalists. Green is the anti-capitalist, antihuman agenda of the Vietnam Era far left hippies who finally overthrew the Rooseveltian democracy of the 1930s and 40s beginning in 1992 when the politically-correct antiwar hippies Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton came to Washington and their vice president, Al Gore, became the doomsday Prophet of Utopia.

I recommend that all Christians and believers in a Creator support this film and our right to academic freedom, intellectual honesty and open debate by going to see Ben Stein’s “Expelled: No intelligence allowed.

I then recommend that Ben Stein do a sequel documentary called “Still No intelligence allowed” that will take on the man-caused global warming academic tyranny.

Darwin’s Kool-Aid drinkers

With his new feature documentary, “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” (opening in theaters April 18), Ben Stein – actor, economist, presidential speechwriter and all around really smart guy – squares off with some of the world’s most prominent anti-theist elites as he gets to the heart of the question, “Who are we, and how did we get here?”

This is not your father’s documentary. “Expelled” rocks the house both literally and figuratively. It’s gripping, music-packed, comically wry and always entertaining. But its entertainment value is yet surpassed by its educational merit. Throughout the film, Stein boldly shines a light of honest inquiry, revealing time and again that Evolution’s Emperor has no clothes.

This is really an insightful thought provoking article. Glick says Wilders is a liberal but because the world does not want to face the truth about Islam they label him right wing. Liberals ostracize anyone who gives facts that does not fit their faith in faith.

Caroline Glick has figured out that liberals are basically cowards that will deny all facts that disagree with their socialist ideals of what a perfect world should be.

I would take it a bit further and say that the Liberal elite are people who think if we can get enough people to think good thoughts that good things will happen. In life they act out “The Secret” touted by Oprah and others. Like one eminent psychiatrist said liberals are mentally ill. While on one level this is true the real problem is spiritual. Their elitist leaders believe in one collective consciousnesses. They think if they can convince the collective to believe something it will then becomes reality. So they spread lies fully expecting that if that can get enough people to believe them their lies will come true.

For example in the name of a democratic world they will not allow democratic debate on any issue if the debate does fit their collective thinking of a socialist Utopian world outcome.

For me this article really nails why the elitist Left take the positions they do on every issue. They actually fear democratic debate because that would mean they would have to acknowledge an evil in the world that cannot be cured by positive thinking. They actually believe that just thinking nice thoughts will bring them peace, security and democracy. All positions they take conform to their faith in an evolutionary progression of man toward enlightenment and that is why present reality and rational thinking is not a big factor in their lives.

This is a must read.

Caroline B. Glick: Fear of democracy

This week a delegation of Christian and Muslim Dutch religious leaders travelled to Cairo to speak to religious Islamic leaders. Speaking to Radio Netherlands, Bas Plaisier, who heads the Dutch Protestant Church said that the delegation’s mission was to “limit the possible consequences” of Wilders’ film. The consequences he was referring to, of course, are the prospects of violent Muslim rioting and attacks against the Dutch and against Christians worldwide.

Radio Netherlands reported that Plaisier “has been receiving disturbing reports from Dutch nationals all over the world, including ones about fear of repercussions among Christians in Sudan, the Middle East and Indonesia.”

So the real reason the Dutch Protestant Church decries the film not because it thinks Wilders is wrong, but because its leaders believe that Wilders is absolutely right. It’s just that unlike Wilders, who has placed his life in danger to express his views, they are too cowardly to defend themselves, and so, they travel to Cairo to genuflect to religious leaders who daily oversee the preaching of hate and Islamic supremacy in Egyptian mosques. They go on bended knee to coo before those who coerced the institutionalization of Egypt’s religious persecution of its Christian Coptic minority and its silencing of liberal critics of the Mubarak regime and the Muslim Brotherhood.

And that is the rub. By squelching debate - out of loathing for their non-leftist political opponents and out of fear of jihadists and the regimes that promote them — the West as a whole undermines not only its own values and foundational creeds. It also undermines the non-jihadists of the Islamic world, who, if ever empowered, would work to promote a form of Islam that does not respond to challenge with violence but rather with the discourse of reason and mutual respect for differences of opinion.

So we are going to hear climate change lies on the TV all over the nation for at least the next three years. Where is the balanced on this? How are the scientists that oppose Al Gore’s junk science hype going to come up with money to inform the people that they are being lied to and brainwashed? Even if they could come up with the money what large news Media would play it?

I hear people say that the science that is coming out will expose Al Gore and the rest of his loons and stop this multi trillion dollar carbon tax scheme. I simply do not think it will be quite that easy. With this kind of money and control of the media these people will have the money to keep their global governance scheme going in spite of the truth. At that point stopping this lie will be no easier than stopping the lie about evolution.

It does not help that every whore in politics and in Religion has prostituted themselves to these globalists. Pat Robertson over the years has proven that he is a false prophet and that he does not hear from God (contrary to what he tells people and his gullible followers believe). Now this ninny says that we need to save the planet? I have news Pat, we can’t save the planet. Jesus will.

Then there is Newt and all three people running for president. Everyone of them are globalists. So what should we expect from them? They would not be in national politics if they did not have backing from the elite of the globalist CFR.

The Liberals believe that man must save the planet because the only force for change on earth in their ungodly minds come from man. God exists they say but they deny He has any identify or power other than man.

So the question then becomes what do those who are not brainwashed do about this blatant misinformation campaign? Scientific reports are not getting anywhere because the national media will not report them. Debunking Al Gore’s and the UN’s data is not getting anywhere because the media ignores it. Pretty soon this CO2 driven climate change is going to be true no matter if we can even prove that the earth is cooling. They will then just say that CO2 is causing that.

I think the people who are still not brainwashed have about one year to get the message out about this hoax or it will be too late. The lies will become the only truth allowed and anyone who says anything different will be labeled as dangerous. Al Gore already set us up for that label on 60 minutes when he equated us with flat earth people. As this ad campaign goes on they will start attacking the non believers of their religion more and more.

The only solution is to to immediately find some big money to counter these ads and we need money to fund science that debunks their huge global warming paid staff. For that to happen we need some wealthy people and foundations to start putting up money to stop them. If it does not happen in a few years you will be paying extra for everything you buy and much of that money will be going to pay for global government and the control freaks that will do nothing but make new rules for you to live by. Do I actually think that people care enough to stop these lies. No.

Gore launches $300 million campaign - Mike Allen - Politico.com

Former Vice President Al Gore is launching a $300 million, bipartisan campaign to try to push climate change higher on the nation’s political agenda.The three-year campaign by the Alliance for Climate Protection will begin Wednesday with network television advertising that will include “American Idol” and other non-traditional shows that reach a non-news audience.

The debut ad, “Anthem,” is posted here.

Pat Robertson and Al Sharpton just filmed an ad for the We Campaign, sitting on a couch on the beach. In the ad, now being produced, they say that while they may not agree on many things, they do agree that they have to work to save the planet.

A future couple in the “strange bedfellows” or “unlikely alliances” spots will be recorded soon: Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Republican former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

The campaign aims to harness the growing awareness of the climate crisis and turn it into one of the top issues on which voters make decisions.

From what I have been reading the revolution is probably not as far in the future as you might think.

CFP: Two Weeks Away from a Revolution

Americans are being screwed by their own government. It’s being led by a President who insists we are “addicted” to oil and a Congress that will not permit the exploration or extraction of the oil we have, so we have to import most of it.It is a Congress whose leadership such as Rep. Pelosi, Sen. Reid, Sen. Lieberman, and others keep lying about global warming. Sen. Hillary Clinton wants to seize oil company profits and spend it in some fashion, presumably not to find any new oil. Sen. McCain is a global warming believer, too. All of these people are a danger to the future of this nation and there doesn’t appear to be a damn thing we can do about it.

Thanks to them, life for Americans is going to get more expensive.

One wonders when the revolution will begin?

When the people of the world catch on that top scientists were corrupted by power, money, politics and peer pressure to create theories of fantasy like CO2 driven global warming and evolution. It will be the end of the world intelligentsia as we know it. When the truth comes out the politicians will be the first ones to point their fingers at the scientific community saying they said there was a scientific conscious.

If you are a scientist going along to go along, you might pay a much higher price than you might ever dream if global warming hype brings about local economic and social disruptions without cause. The political hucksters will be the first to turn against you peddling new rags to suggestible people who always buy their new line of goods.

American Thinker: The Epicycles of Global Warming

When True Believers begin to harbor doubts, they don’t immediately give up the faith. It’s too scary; too much pride and money has been invested; too many jobs and reputations are on the line; and they need to find a new reason to live. So they always try to add on new wrinkles and qualifications to their crumbling story.Today that’s happening with the global warming cult.

Politicized science is a far bigger disaster than NASA’s Challenger tragedy. Americans
understood the Challenger tragedy as a technical mistake at the leading
edge of space exploration. What we cannot understand or forgive is
corruption of scientific inquiry to push a money agenda.

When this farce is finally exposed, heads must roll. Not for being wrong
about the global warming hoax, because anybody can be wrong — but for
politicizing normal scientific debate. Politicized science kills
science. This is one festering boil that has to be lanced.

The Southern Baptist Convention leadership is now supporting global warming hysteria. They say the threat is too grave to wait for perfect knowledge about how people contribute to the warming trend. Apparently they think Baptists need to provide support to this junk science inducted hysteria that will cost the world trillions of dollars and put everyone under the management of the world’s control freaks. They say, “Baptists have a Biblical duty to stop global warming”???? Are they nuts??

I would like to know what is so grave about the warming? The .7 degree rise over the last 100 years that might have been reversed last year? Is that grave?? Or is the grave threat to the planet the junk science computer model horoscopes that cannot even model known past climate, yet predict future climate? Should Baptists consider junk science to be a grave threat?

Here, I thought sin was the grave threat to the earth and that Jesus is the radical answer? No. the Baptist leadership tells us the grave threat to the planet is CO2 levels!

Which all proves to me that the Southern Baptist Convention leadership has little discernment on world issues, yet spiritual issues. No wonder they are buying into postmodern theology. Who asked them to tell Southern Baptists what they should support on environmental issues anyway? Next, they will be telling us like the Pope that there is significant evidence for evolution so we we should believe that as well, as long as it does not conflict with our own version of biblical truth.

While I am on my soap box let me just say that the papacy of Nashville already says way too much about worldly issues. They often put their womanly world views in every quarterly magazine used in almost every Southern Baptist Church. Listen you Southern Baptist pastors, have you ever tried teaching the Bible on Sundays in your church without Lifeway’s input? That link will give you much more about what I have to say on that issue.

My suggestion to the Southern Baptist leadership is to get back to teaching the truths of the Bible and stop spending your time trying to help the dead bury the dead!

FOXNews.com - Southern Baptist Leaders Issue Surprising Call to Fight Climate Change - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

NEW YORK — In a major shift, a group of Southern Baptist leaders said their denomination has been “too timid” on environmental issues and has a biblical duty to stop global warming.The declaration, signed by the president of the Southern Baptist Convention among others and released Monday, shows a growing urgency about climate change even within groups that once dismissed claims of an overheating planet as a liberal ruse. The conservative denomination has 16.3 million members and is the largest Protestant group in the U.S.

Obama is just the repackaging of tired old socialism in a deceptive new rapper

American Thinker: The Fierce Urgency of Lies

That is his appeal; he is an actor, a performer, a cinematic presence that stirs simple emotions, emotions that have little grounding in truth. His speeches are the inane lyrics to a popular song that endures only because it has a great beat. One must not think to deeply on what Obama says, for it turns to smoke and disappears in the light of day. Ezra Klein is correct, Obama’s speeches do not inform, they pander, they propagandize, they harmonize with the mythology of despair and the chimera of entitlement. As his hagiographies proclaim, he represents a new Camelot, but one that does not hold America quite so precious, a Camelot of globalists, moral relativists and communitarians.

An Obama administration will be one of historical revision, of faltering American values, of ideologues crafting “progressive” policy, of radicals telling citizens how to live, what to drive, what to eat and what to believe. They will tell us that the constitution is a living document and should change to reflect the times. They will tell us that we must pay more and more for the common good. They will take away our choices and make more and more of us dependant. Obama’s will be an administration of concocted class warfare, of racial exceptionalism and of pro-Islamist bias, and in the name of redefined justice and revolutionary inclusiveness, America will lose part of her soul and more of her freedoms. For all his rhetoric of hope, change and “coming together,” we still live in a perilous world. In a time of Islamic terror and nuclear proliferation, an Obama presidency will undermine America as never before.

Dr. Rossiter said that liberals have a mental disorder. Of course Dr. Rossiter is correct but that disorder really is a physical manifestation of their spiritual disorder. Liberals deny any God who has any control over His own creation and that is the root of their disease.

Liberals believe only more highly evolved enlightened people know what is right or wrong for everyone else. That is not logical because from where would they get their enlightenment? The liberals think it is evolutionary but in actually what they perceive as enlightenment is in reality darkness from Satan for the purpose of enslaving all of mankind.

Liberals tend to blindly make satanic people their idols and will not tolerate anyone who will not bow to their counterfeit savior’s programs. That explains the blind followers of Al Gore, Obama, media stars etc. and liberal’s irrational hatred toward those who tell them the truth.

clipped from www.worldnetdaily.com Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by: creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation; augmenting primitive feelings of envy; rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government. “The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says. “When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

The article gives ample proof that CO2 does not drive global warming.  The author suggests that global warming advocates will either go into denial because they cannot take being wrong or they will switch to the threat of global cooling. I do not think that will be the way it will turn out.

There is already plenty of proof that global warming is not man caused and the little warming that there was over the last hundred years is not any threat to mankind. Nevertheless, if you tell lies long and loud enough, and certain people stand to get rich supporting these lies, and politicians stand to gain power over the people through these lies, the lies are not going to be done away with anytime soon.

If science reports that there is no man cause global warming. It simply will not be covered by the major medias and the educational systems. Those in the scientific community who tell the truth will be marginalized or even fired. Even today many scientists know the truth but they also know if they take any position against man caused global warming hype they risk losing their careers.

It is very much like the lie of evolution. No other truth will be accepted by the establishment and those who do try to teach truth are said to be fundamentalists nuts driven by religion that are deranged and dangerous if they actually believe that the Bible contains absolute truth. They call them a danger to society since they will not conform to the satanically inspired consensus of the godless and where they wish to take the world.

Politicians and the global elite will continue to support climate change junk science worldwide because the agenda behind this is not about climate control at all. It is really about wealth transfer, control over all people, group consensus, cosmic consciousness, man’s evolutionary advance and a tax base to fund global government. There is no major difference between what is going on here than what Hitler, Marx, Stalin and Mao envisioned for the people. Western society has been brainwashed to think that fascism is right wing. National socialism (Nazi’s) is Left wing. Social control of all people on earth through government and religion is from the Far Left.

They do not need a lot of time to bring about their fascist like world socialism. They have made huge advances in the last few years all over the world. They will have much of their global governance controls in place worldwide by early next decade.

If there is evidence of global cooling like we seen in China and other places this year they will just blame it on Climate Change caused by global warming. The populations of the earth have already been brainwashed to believe all climate change is caused by the warming of the earth. 

The only way this thing will be exposed and stopped is if people learn to critically think for themselves. Since that concept is not taught or allowed in this postmodern generation people will not catch on in time to stop their agenda of world control. Once the socialist fascist globalist elitist control freaks achieve their goals of total global governance, climate change will be the least of anyone’s concerns, but it will be too late to do anything about it. By the time the truth become evident to the general population the world will be under big brother and global tyranny.

You have been warned!

People who swear by the idea that man can affect climate - may drown in their own blood in a minute. The one factor left out is proof positive that elevated CO2 does not cause Global Warming. The debate is over. A good scientist can’t afford to miss this data.

If one looks at all temperature correlations and CO2 levels, there appears to be absolutely no correlation between the two variables. Granted, CO2 levels are at 370ppm right now–the highest they’ve been since 1850. But if one looks at the two above variables closely, the case can be made that the rising temperatures are actually responsible for increasing CO2 levels.

From the Scripps Institute (Mauna Loa), it can be seen that CO2 levels have increased virtually every year since 1850. But other sources—tree rings, ice cores, etc…, say that CO2 levels at earlier times have been more than 7x that of today.

Once this information settles in with “Global Warming” alarmists, two types will likely emerge. 1) Those that refuse to believe the actual data, and hold fast to their position because they don’t want to be considered wrong. And, 2) Those that will start screaming about concerns over the oncoming Global Cooling impact. That is if the other 17 known facts about natural causes of warming isn’t carefully considered as well.

D’Aleo concludes “Given the recent cooling of the Pacific and Atlantic and rapid decline in solar activity, we might anticipate given these correlations, temperatures to accelerate downward shortly.” Without CO2 driving climate, it is likely global warming alarmists won’t know what to do with themselves.

Full article

Chuck Baldwin — Why Does The Establishment Hate Ron Paul?

Maybe Dr. Paul needs to start a third party movement because by the time of the national election the country might be in bad enough shape that it will get off the ground. It certainly would be a feasible third party by the next national election. In any case, a third party President cannot change the establishment in this country by himself. It would take a movement that would also replace most of the Representatives in the House and the Senate.

Ron Paul is not interested in creating a world empire. Neither is he a
warmonger. He would squash the burgeoning New World Order in its tracks–and the globalists ensconced in Washington and New York City know it. There is only one Presidential candidate who would bring a modern-day revolution to Washington, D.C., and it is not Barack Obama or Mike Huckabee. It is Ron Paul. Obama and Huckabee–along with the rest of the Democrat and Republican contenders–are only more of the same. The same Nanny State, the same unconstitutional laws and regulations, the same advances toward global government, the same attacks against individual liberties, the same arrogance, the same hypocrisy, the same social programs, the same back-breaking taxes, the same jack-booted federal police tactics, the same IRS, the same lobbyists, and the same corrupt Washington politics.

Chuck Baldwin — Who Are These Kooks?: “No matter what ultimately happens to Ron Paul’s candidacy, the fight to return America to its roots of freedom and independence has started. The fire is lit. There is no putting it out. There will be other Ron Pauls, other campaigns, other spokesmen, other fundraising. The people supporting Ron Paul will not be silenced; they will not be ignored; they will not be intimidated. In truth, Ron Paul’s campaign may just be the beginning of the end of the elitist, globalist, stranglehold over America.”

Are there more who want a return to America the way it was, or are there now more who want a America that will give them their government handout? We shall see. I think we will go back to our roots but not before a world war, a major depression or a breakup of the Union. Ron Paul is probably a decade ahead of the coming counterrevolution. We could see a new party because of his effort. That grass roots party might be more important than who is President next term because no matter who is elected, disaster is likely to be the end result for the US in the next decade.

NIE in the sky? - - The Washington Times, America’s Newspaper: “There are several reasons for concern about NIE’s about-face on Iran’s nuclear weapons capability.

The assessment appears to have been triggered primarily by recent humint input. Worrisome is the weight given to what may well be a counter-intelligence effort by Tehran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The humint relied upon is a claim by senior IRGC official Ali Rez Asgari who defected during a February trip to Turkey. Mr. Asgari told a foreign intelligence agency all activity on Iran’s nuclear weapons program stopped four years ago. His claim purportedly was supported by intercepted communications among Iranian officials.”

Against this backdrop of declared Iranian intentions to destroy us, of past questionable U.S. intelligence assessments, of the timing of Mr. Asgari’s defection, of the inexperience and motivations of the analysts, can we afford to put the world at risk by blindly accepting it? Previously, the U.S. was able to bounce back following flawed intelligence assessments. But that will not be the case if we are wrong about Iran.
Therefore, the only assessment we can afford to accept is one obtained via verifiable inspection of a nuclear weapons development program Tehran keeps hidden deep beneath the Earth’s surface, while claiming peaceful intent.

FOXNews.com - Iran Is Making a Greater Push Into Nicaragua - International News News of the World Middle East News Europe News: “Some state department officials are concerned that Iran’s presence in Nicaragua would allow Tehran to stage strikes on American interests by deploying the terrorist group Hezbollah and Revolutionary Guard operatives already in Latin America, the Express reported.”

FOXNews.com - Dissident: Iran’s Top Commanders Are Nuclear Weapons Scientists - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum: “WASHINGTON — Twenty-one commanders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps are the top scientists running Iran’s secret nuclear weapons program, says the man who exposed Iran’s nuclear weapons program in 2002. On top of that, the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate published last week saying Tehran shut down its weaponization program in 2003 failed to mention that the program restarted in mid-2004, said Alireza Jafarzadeh, an Iranian dissident and president of Strategic Policy Consulting. The scientists working on the alleged civilian nuclear centrifuge program are IGRC commanders, said Jafarzadeh, who was providing a list of names to the press on Tuesday. But their intention is not a nuclear energy source for civilians.”

American Thinker: What Caused the NIE Reversal on Iran’s Nuclear Program?
“One revelation published in Saturday’s Washington Post indicated that our intelligence community relied, in part, on the word of Iranian leader Hashemi Rafsanjani — long time power broker in Iran and a man marked by his extremism, corruption, intimate involvement in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards terror network and one of the men who has the most vested interest in furthering the Iranian nuclear program. He is also one of the wealthiest men in Iran with a compelling desire to avoid a sanctions regime that would directly harm his family’s business empire.”

“our intelligence community (knowm for a series of high profile of intelligence failures over the years) now relies on the words of Rafsnajani, who once boasted of the desirability and feasibility of destroying Israel. George Orwell would be amused.”