America is being set up for deception on every front and on both coasts
There is no question by what the Pope said that the Pope wants a global government. He wants the UN to rule the world, of course with his religious guidance. The globalists largely create the international problems and then they deceive you to believe that they are the solution to them.
Once we have binding international rules like the Pope wants you will have a fascist world that will be ready for the one who takes the place of Christ on earth (Antichrist). It won’t be this 81 year old Pope but I would not rule out the next as being the Antichrist or his false prophet.
If you read this article and follow the links you will see that the globalists have plans to give the Pope a role in their planned new world order. Now all the globalists have to do is unite major religions by outlawing fundamentalism and promoting pantheism, Christ consciousness, and Universalism. If you read my other articles today you will see that this deceptive process is well underway by the wolves in sheep’s clothing even in evangelical Christianity. In Islam some moderates have already rewritten the Koran and taken out the objectionable versus. Expect the Bible to be next.
So seeing all this I do not think a world government and a world religion is more than one or two decades away and if there is a world war it could come much sooner. So get ready. We have just about arrived to the time the prophets spoke about. If you need any more proof look at what is happening around Israel, Europe and the far East.
By the way Mr Pope, your blessing the UN flag does not make the UN any less anti-Christian and pagan. Your thinking that blessing a flag does something tells me wonders about your pagan beliefs.
Anytime some doubt arises about the Pope being a wolf in sheep’s clothing he opens his mouth and dispels them. Obviously the Pope really came to the US to talk to the UN. All the ceremony and pageantry is just a display by the world to honor one of their Buddhas. Jesus said the world would hate us not honor us. Last week we had “His Holyness” the Dalai Lama Buddha on the west coast with his deceptions and now we have “His Holyness” the Catholic Buddha on the East coast with his deceptions. This is not a coincidence they have very much the same views. Who will be speaking to the world next? Will it be the Lord Maitreya, The Mahdi, or will it be Oprah and the Queen of Heaven? I hope you get the picture that the world stage is now being set up for its final pagan act.
Pope blesses U.N. flag, calls for “binding international rules”
Pope Benedict XVI spoke to the U.N. General Assembly on Friday, warning nations against undermining the authority of the United Nations by acting unilaterally. The Pope also found time to bless the U.N. flag.
Reuters reports,
“Countries that act unilaterally on the world stage undermine the authority of the United Nations and weaken the broad consensus needed to confront global problems, Pope Benedict said on Friday.
The international community must be “capable of responding to the demands of the human family through binding international rules,” said the 81-year-old pope, who spoke after meeting privately with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.He said the notion of multilateral consensus was “in crisis because it is still subordinated to the decisions of a few, whereas the world’s problems call for interventions in the form of collective action by the international community.”
Date posted: Friday, April 18th, 2008 11:44 pm | Under category: Apostasy, Beast/Antichrist, Big Brother, Global government/Beast government, Islam, Mystery Babylon, New Age/New Spirituality, aberrant/heretical teaching, control freaks, dangers, discernment, false Christs
RSS 2.0 | Comment | Trackback
I do wish you used your Bible. Jesus is on the throne, now, in the flesh, in the kingdom of heaven, which is within you. Do not misunderstand. Jesus is the son of God, Saviour of men, Creator of all things, sent by the Father to suffer and die for the sins of men, representively for the whole human race, the second Adam. We know Him becuase the Holy Spirit testifies of Him to them whome He has regenerated and given eternal life.
I do wish you used your Bible to discern the times instead of men’s ideas and television.
I do use my Bible to discern the times, do you? Tell us then what did you discern?
Jesus is not on David’s throne yet that was on earth in a literal promised kingdom and regeneration on earth.
The kingdom of heaven is not within you it won’t fit, it is a place. The passage you think you know is a mistranslation. It actually says the Kingdom of heaven is within your midst.
I do wish you would comment on the post topic instead of making false accusations and generalizations.
I do not mean to acuse, and apologize that I did - not intentionally.
So then do you, as does the pope (refer to the article). deny that Jesus “is come” (Greek present and imperfect tense referring to a present continuation) in the flesh? (Of course you do not.) Is it not enough the the pope claims the title of God the Father (Holy Father), God the Holy Spirit (Vicar of Christ), and God the Son (Supreme Pontiff) and sits in the temple (Christian Church) showing himself to be God to agree with the Reformers that he is already the antichrist? (All have been since antichrist is usually always plural in terms of men, singular in terms of spirit.)
I do agree with you in this article. I also read a few others and then made my comment.
My Bible does not contain mistranslations. You are using a second definition to fit your dispensational model. Christ lives and rules in Christians.
from Strong’s (Luke 17:21)
within
New Testament Greek Definition:
1787 entos {en-tos’}
from 1722;; prep
AV - within 2; 2
1) within, inside
1a) within you i.e. in the midst of you
1b) within you i.e. your soul
I do not doubt that the Pope is antichrist. However he is not the Beast of Revelation that we commonly call the end time Antichrist figure or the man of sin.
A Temple is not a Christian Church when the Bible refers to a physical Temple on earth it is always talking about the Temple on the Mount in Jerusalem.
Your Bible contains mistranslations all bible versions do and you ought to know that. Perhaps in this case mistranslation was the wrong word to use.
What I said has nothing to do with my dispensational model. It has everything to do with reading the 32 “kingdom of heaven” passages which usually define a literal place not a infilling.
Because I choose 1a and you choose to use 1 does not make you correct. But even if you are correct and Jesus was saying that the Kingdom comes in Spirit to His people it does not nullify the promised restoration of a physical kingdom on earth.
Anyway, this is not the place to argue amillennial verses dispensational theology.
The post is about the Pope and the deception he brings. We can agree on that.
Good comments. The end time theology does, unfortunately, color our view of the pope relative to our interprestation of who fits the son of perdition.
I still believe the pope(s) fir this description because of his (their) eclesiastical and polital positions. I think the great wound was removal of total power by the Protestant Reformation. Howver, as recent events marching toward ecumenical and inter-faith communion indicate, the pope (and the institution) are in the mix - actual in control. The recent visit to our “king” highlights the deceitfulness of the pope and the blindness upon the people. I think the wound has healed, and power (think EU) are being restored.
In your model, you are looking for a literal temple and a less seductive evil ruler. In mine, I see the characteristics of the pope match the subtleness and beauty of the serpent. He does look as a lamb, and he does speak as the dragon. The world is becoming more and more involved with him. I look no further than the pope for the “Big A.”
Yeah but my views are based on known dispensational theology. Apparently yours are based on allegorical interpretations of scripture shaped to fit whatever bazaar eschatology that you dream up. Write a book..Many people are into end time fiction..
That is really nasty, Don.
My theology is that of Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon. I cannot say that I am sorry for their understanding.
Besides I thought this was “not the place to argue amillennial verses dispensational theology.”
Just for the record, I cannot find two dispensationalist that agree on their dispensationalism. They do all, however, get very nasty, just as you did.
I apologise for considering you Christian.
J.
It was not nasty to point out that you are making it up as you go along. I have responsibility to other readers as well. You are obviously using your own modified form of the historical view of Revelation. That view is a dead view even among most amillennal believers. The reason being is that history cannot produce the events in the book of Revelation. The papal system did not and could not possibly fulfill all the prophecies of the Beast/Antichrist.
Moreover, I was not even talking about the amilennal theology of Luther, Calvin and Spurgeon. I was commenting on your bazaar historical interpretation of Revelation events in the Popes visit and calling our President a King.
No theology has perfect agreement. If Biblical interpretation was that cut and dry there would be no theologians and discussions.
I find it really strange for anyone to make a remark like your final one, as if you can judge who is a Christians because of my reply to your strange end time allegory.
You started this conversation with a personal attack on my ability to read the Bible and you end it with a personal attack saying I am not a Christian. You have a problem because theological disagreement provokes personal attacks from you. Any further unfounded accusations about me will simply be deleted.
As you should, because this is your website, you may have the last word.
For the record: I apologized for my attack earlier, and I told you that it was not meant to be an attack. I had read other things that you have posted and confused the subject.
I did not say you were not Christian - you may be. I only apoligized forconsidering that you were one that practiced as a result of your nasty, and now nastier, political reply.
One word of advise: Do not ask for comments if you cannot handle them!
(No doubt, this will also be considered an accusation, and perhaps you will not show it.)
I am nasty and nastier because I do not agree with your views and think that your personal attacks are Juvenile? What nastier political reply is that?
Comments are for responding to the post, many Blog hosts just delete comments they do not like. I have not done that with rare exception..
In all the comments over the last year or so. Yours is the only one that started and ended with a personal attack. Personal attacks are common place on certain public news groups. They will not be common place here.
Who really attacked who?
‘Bye, Don.
I forgot to answer your question.
You are not nasty because you do not agree with me. You are just plain nasty in your reply.
Now: ‘Bye Don!
I certainly had good reason to be nasty after your personal attacks but I really was quite civil.
Silly fellow!