I think the minutes will reflect what was said in the article that is attacked to this post about what they did with this resolution.

You know Joe, The SBC is entitled to make a decision not to deal with this resolution and to not make a recommendation that Baptist Christians should take their kids out of public schools but I also can express my opinion what I think that all means and what I think Baptists ought to do about it. That is what my comment was about.

I want large Baptist churches and large Christian churches in other denominations to start building Christian schools and I want rural ones to help enable parents to home school. Perhaps then the government will get the message and stop the anti Christian indoctrination. But they are not getting any message when Christians do nothing. The first step is to declare that what we find going on in public schools to be unexceptionable and let them know we are determined to do something about it. That is where leadership comes in. If we do not do that I can guarantee that under the next administration it will be the California agenda in every state of the Union.

Your “pain” threshold is very low. I do not mean to be a pain. Your last article was very helpful. Since the Annual Convention has just very recently past, the minutes are not available yet. I found the resolution by proper name to have been submitted by the conservatives of Tennessee. I will await the minutes of the meeting to make judgement..

Read this one

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66430

This is what this was all about and if you look at the dates and the subjects in that article it is not talking about 2004, it is talking about 2008. The follow up article that is the issue of this post was what the national SBC convention did on that resolution this month.

I cannot help it that you cannot find the issue on the SBC website. They killed the resolution in committee so maybe they don’t care to inform anyone about issues they kill in committee.

It has nothing to do with a local California SBC convention.

The SBC takes positions on lessor national social issues and issues of the people who attend Southern Baptist Churches. It cannot tell any Church what to do but it exists for a reason and it can make recommendations as it will on the gay marriage agenda in California.

As the article linked to in this blog said, the reason they did not want to address the “taking your kids out of public school resolution” was because they said they wanted to focus on the California gay marriage agenda. If you need any more information on the resolution that Attorney Bruce Shortt brought up at the 2008 convention I suggest you try to contact Bruce Shortt

I read the 2004 article it is much the same, in 2004 the SBC more or less said they did not want to advise parents what to do on that resolution. It looks like Bruce Short Shortt also introduced the resolution in that year.

Much has changed in the schools for the worse since 2004 and if the Church is not going to address the youth disaster then why in the world are top Christian leaders now planning to have a convention at Thomas Roads Baptist in August to address why young people now have a eight times worse view of Evangelicals then they used too? The people holding the convention think it is because the church has not been humble enough but the real main reason we have lost a whole generation is because they are receiving thousands of hours of anti-Christian propaganda in public schools and in media. They also are been fed worldly amoral valves so what should we expect?.

Look, if the churches are not going to deal with the real issue with the youth they ought to quit the B.S. about reaching the youth because the Church is not going to reach these indoctrinated brainwashed kids especially when the gospel is hardly available to hear anywhere either..

I went to the source: the SBC website. I found nothing. Tell your readers how to find this information on the source site. I cannot find it! Perhaps you have honestly reported what others have reported. This is a Fox News article from 2004: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122885,00.html.
Believe me, I am involved with a Southern Baptist Church, and I have more than one fault to discuss with my leaders. I want to know more. I have to have solid proof, not secondary interpretation. I will not falsely accuse my brothers and sisters of any denomination based upon secondary evidence.

This apparently is a resolution in just the local California convention. Parents of children that think that public schools teach evil should find an alternative. Many SBC folks in Virginia do just that. I do not think the convention, having no authority over any SBC fellowship, is the body which should make such resolutions.

The article that address this issue is dated June 7th 2008 and is quoted on this same blog. The first line of this blog says that I talked about this issue LAST WEEK. So if you cannot look back to posts I made LAST WEEK don’t blame me.

This present post addresses that the resolution to the SBC convention that I spoke of on June 7th was rejected in committee when they met in JUNE 2008! They frankly said in the article I quoted that wanted to focus all their energy on the gay marriage agenda in California. So how in the world could this be an issue of 2004?

I cannot post the entire article on my blog that would be copyright infringement you have to read the whole article to get everything that is said. That is why there is a link to the full article at the top of what I quote.

I had said in my June 7th comment on this blog that I thought the SBC would probably do nothing on the school resolution and they proved me right. Thus, I wrote this follow-up article. I wrote it because Christians need to hold their representatives accountable since the SBC decided not be bothered with what I believe to be the most important U.S. Christian social issue of our time.

I suggest you read the articles that are being addressed before you respond.

My brothers and sisters at the SBC did nothing on this resolution and all Children will still be given thousands of hours of anti Christian indoctrinated in public schools and that sir is fact! If there is a more important issue that the SBC should be addressing I would like to hear it. Even if taking your kids out of public schools was addressed in 2004 by the SBC they obviously recommend nothing, as they did in 2008. It is a far more serious issue today.

This post of course is in regard to the quoted article (the link to the full article is on top of the quoted part).

It is the follow-up to what was brought to my attention and I commented on and quoted on this blog on June 7th. Please read my following post followed by the entire article that .I commented on.

http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/the-fall-of-christianity-in-america.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66430

The biggest protestant denomination in the country does not want to touch the issue of what is being taught in our public schools. When the overseers in the Church know that there is a problem and they do nothing they have become part of the problem. So in effect by not telling parents to take their children out of these schools they will be held accountable. Now if they had told parents to take them out and the parents did not, it would not be on their own heads.

Do you realize that if all Christian parents took their kids out of public schools that this indoctrination would stop. The schools would change in a heartbeat. So it is really just taking a stand on what is taught in public schools and saying loud and clear that we have had enough. But SBC says sorry…. we have more important issues like trying to put a band-aid on one of the symptoms of perversion in this country rather than treating the brainwashing disease that will doom a whole generation to hell!

It is time that Christians leaders started to lead!