<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Positions on the Ezekiel 38-39 war and the Rapture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html</link>
	<description>Don Koenig gives his wordviews on world and Church issues that often relate to Bible prophecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>I do not recall seeing that particular article since I do not spend my time searching to read articles with bad and rehashed theology. There are thousands of articles written against the pre-trib postion and they all bring up the same old tired arguments that have been answered over and over again.

In short the main problem with the post toastie position is that they cannot discern the difference between what is written for Israel and what is written to the Church. They also do not understand that the Bride of Christ is already without spot or wrinkle because she is a new creature washed in the blood of the Lamb. They think the Bride has to be purged of imperfections during the tribulation.  Post toasties think the faithful Church needs to be perfected by fighting the Antichrist and through martyrdom. 

Some new post toastie authors today teach the Beast is Islam because they think that they are already in the tribulation or that we will be in the next couple of years and Islam is the only possibility of a Beast that fits their extremely short time line. Or course it is all nonsense. The Beast/Antichrist is lawless and Islam is anything but lawless. The whole hedonistic Western world is not going to convert to the laws of Islam. 

If you search the &lt;strong&gt;article achieve&lt;/strong&gt; on this website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pre-trib.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; pre-trib.org&lt;/a&gt; you will find most of the arguments that refute any of the rehashed post toastie views. I am not going to rehash the many arguments here. My views are already written in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepropheticyears.com/reasons/rapture.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my own article on the rapture&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not recall seeing that particular article since I do not spend my time searching to read articles with bad and rehashed theology. There are thousands of articles written against the pre-trib postion and they all bring up the same old tired arguments that have been answered over and over again.</p>
<p>In short the main problem with the post toastie position is that they cannot discern the difference between what is written for Israel and what is written to the Church. They also do not understand that the Bride of Christ is already without spot or wrinkle because she is a new creature washed in the blood of the Lamb. They think the Bride has to be purged of imperfections during the tribulation.  Post toasties think the faithful Church needs to be perfected by fighting the Antichrist and through martyrdom. </p>
<p>Some new post toastie authors today teach the Beast is Islam because they think that they are already in the tribulation or that we will be in the next couple of years and Islam is the only possibility of a Beast that fits their extremely short time line. Or course it is all nonsense. The Beast/Antichrist is lawless and Islam is anything but lawless. The whole hedonistic Western world is not going to convert to the laws of Islam. </p>
<p>If you search the <strong>article achieve</strong> on this website <a href="http://www.pre-trib.org/" rel="nofollow"> pre-trib.org</a> you will find most of the arguments that refute any of the rehashed post toastie views. I am not going to rehash the many arguments here. My views are already written in <a href="http://www.thepropheticyears.com/reasons/rapture.htm" rel="nofollow">my own article on the rapture</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepropheticyears.com/wordpress/2009/04/05/positions-on-the-ezekiel-38-39-war-and-the-rapture.html#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>I was just wondering if you are familiar with an article on Google entitled &quot;Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty&quot; and would like your reaction to it.     Carmen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just wondering if you are familiar with an article on Google entitled &#8220;Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty&#8221; and would like your reaction to it.     Carmen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
