Dr. Mahmoud Strangelove, I believe?

They think they will be dancing in the street if they nuked Israel but in reality those that survived the counter strikes would all be cowering in feces filled caves.

American Thinker: Dr. Mahmoud Strangelove, I believe?: “The case for a preemptive nuclear strike by Israel is becoming more and more compelling. Israel has been openly threatened with Holocaust for three decades by the Khomeini cult. Their expressed intentions couldn’t be clearer. If you yell, ‘I’m going to shoot you, cop!’ every day for thirty years, and finally aim a loaded gun, any cop will open fire. Israel has an estimated 200 nuclear weapons, three decades of experience working with them, and nuclear-armed submarines, jet bombers, and cruise missiles. So it has both a preemptive and a second-strike capacity through its submarines. Once that Djinn is out of the bottle, the rational course is to destroy all of Iran’s aggressive capacity as fast as possible, leaving not a wrack behind. Be careful what you wish for, Mahmoud. ”

“It’s high time for the Muslim world to educate itself on the logic of mutual destruction. That goes for the newspaper editors and journalists, the teachers and the opinion leaders. It’s one thing to thirst for revenge, and quite another thing to inflict Armageddon on one’s own family and country.
When it comes to national pride, nukes are not the solution. They are the suicide option.”


Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share

2 thoughts on “Dr. Mahmoud Strangelove, I believe?

  1. What’s nice about getting this same message over and over on my blogs
    from this fraud is that I can just repeat my reply.

    The Quran holds no
    weight since it is not God’s word. Only what the Bible says is really
    relevant.

    The Bible said it was Isaac that Abraham took to be sacrificed. Isaac was Abraham’s only son because the slavegirl and her
    son were disinherited by Abraham and God told Abraham Ishmael would not
    share in the promise that came through Abraham and Sarah.

    Ishmael was
    born of works of the flesh because Abraham took a slave girl and tried
    to fulfill a promise of God by human effort.

    The promise of God could
    only come the way God said it would come through God’s doing. It came
    via a birth from Sarah who was too old to naturally conceive a child.

    It obviously had to be a work of God and this fulfilled the promise.
    Thus,Ishmael represents those who would try to come to God through
    works of the flesh while Isaac represents those born of God by faith. We
    see that being played out today.

    Islam is a religion of fleshly works for God while Christianity is those living by faith in God’s righteousness to fulfill His promises.

    You made a good observation
    about Ishmael being about 17 years old when he was cast out. If you
    must have Hagar carrying him perhaps he was injured in the dispute the
    prior night or was sick.
    Actually no one is sure from the Hebrew text
    that it actually says that.

    It is clear from previous passages that he
    was not a infant. He was circumcised at 13 and this event was at least
    a couple of years after that. It is very common in the scripture to
    call a teen a child.

    Some have come to the conclusion that the child was an infant by assuming they have inside knowledge of the details but
    they are clearly wrong.

  2. On second thought I don’t want Islamic propaganda with a lot of links to Muslim websites on my blog. So from now on these spam posts will just be deleted.

Comments are closed.